Ian Grant Subscriber Joined Aug 2, 2004 Messages 23,262 Location West Midland Format Multi Format Sep 5, 2009 #26 Six-16 isn't the same width as 120, I made that error arew weeks ago Ian
mhcfires Member Joined May 18, 2008 Messages 593 Location El Cajon, CA Format Multi Format Sep 7, 2009 #27 Ian Grant said: Six-16 isn't the same width as 120, I made that error arew weeks ago Ian Click to expand... Not sure, but I think Six-16 is 70mm wide. 120/620 is 60mm wide.
Ian Grant said: Six-16 isn't the same width as 120, I made that error arew weeks ago Ian Click to expand... Not sure, but I think Six-16 is 70mm wide. 120/620 is 60mm wide.
Nicholas Lindan Advertiser Advertiser Joined Sep 2, 2006 Messages 4,243 Location Cleveland, Ohio Format Multi Format Sep 7, 2009 #28 Given that sometimes knowing what won't work can be useful - a 6x6 Zeiss Nettar (517/16) is 1.75"
kurtdriver Member Joined Apr 17, 2009 Messages 7 Location 49º 15' 27.2 Format Large Format Sep 10, 2009 #29 My Belfoca is less than 1.5 inches, just. US$25 and shoots great pictures in either 6x9 or 6x6 frames with 120 film. And it fits in a shirt pocket.
My Belfoca is less than 1.5 inches, just. US$25 and shoots great pictures in either 6x9 or 6x6 frames with 120 film. And it fits in a shirt pocket.