I have a Leica 50mm Summicron-R which I love the results from. I am currently using it on my Canon EOS 3 with a Leitax adapter. I was thinking it would be really nice to use the lens on a native body without stop-down metering/aperture control so am looking at an R8/R9. Would you say this is a reasonable thing to do?
I use the EOS 3 with the Summicron and a Voigtlander 40mm so it is not a very big system investment plus I don't really care for AF. I am also not too bothered about a motordrive (I could get one for the R8/R9...) but do want the auto exposure and other automations. The main thing I am concerned about is the viewfinder. The EOS 3 has a nice viewfinder and I have a Ec-S screen which will show DOF to f/1.8. I do not like using a split screen, just a plain matte screen.
So...if I were to get an R8/R9 what would I be giving up and gaining? I I was to get rid of the EOS 3, Voigtlander and Leitax I'd probably get enough for a R8 so the initial investment is not that high. Plus I have a Hasselblad I'm looking to dump.
Or should I just dump everything and get an M body and 50/2?
I use the EOS 3 with the Summicron and a Voigtlander 40mm so it is not a very big system investment plus I don't really care for AF. I am also not too bothered about a motordrive (I could get one for the R8/R9...) but do want the auto exposure and other automations. The main thing I am concerned about is the viewfinder. The EOS 3 has a nice viewfinder and I have a Ec-S screen which will show DOF to f/1.8. I do not like using a split screen, just a plain matte screen.
So...if I were to get an R8/R9 what would I be giving up and gaining? I I was to get rid of the EOS 3, Voigtlander and Leitax I'd probably get enough for a R8 so the initial investment is not that high. Plus I have a Hasselblad I'm looking to dump.
Or should I just dump everything and get an M body and 50/2?