Sounds interesting, but I do have a question. How many people have time to check all those sites? Maybe I'm just uncommonly busy for some reason...but I barely have enough time to check APUG, and Photo.net - that's only 2 sites! And now you're going to make three more...
I'm just trying to figure out why you want to split it all up? Why dilute your user base and therefore your revenue base from advertisers, etc looking to capture a lot of market share? Look at Photo.net as an example. They cover everything on one site. I am a paying member there, and here. They have a LOT more user base than we do here. I like APUG better in ways, because it fits my style (manual Minolta gear, darkroom, etc), but there's no denying the userbase of Photo.net, and having everything all in one place.
Just coming at you from the other way, not meaning to be contrary to your idea with all the different domains; just making everyone think about it.
Jed
APUG is possibly the only place on the web where it's possible to have a sensible discussion about film-related processes without ignorant people making foolish comparisons or "helpful" suggestions about digital processes. I see no need for APUG to change.
When artists meet and discuss painting they don't argue with each other over watercolour being better than oil or enquire "have you gone acrylic yet?" They discuss their preferences without arguing any superiority. We should do the same.
Steve.
stuff
No need for anyone to think for a second that would ever happen. APUG is here to stay.I accept that Sean or anyone else makes as many web forums about Digital Imaging, Hybrid Media or whatever, but if APUG starts allowing discussions about digital, count me out...
When artists meet and discuss painting they don't argue with each other over watercolour being better than oil or enquire "have you gone acrylic yet?"
Sean,
Why are you thinking we are such a closed and exclusive community???
Yes we are indexed heavily and fairly well known but am I getting us 'out there' in the ways which count..
Are you referring to this thread or the site? If you are referring to the site then it doesn't sound like you've read the entire thread. Nothing on APUG is changing so I'm not sure I follow you.. These types of threads do tend to generate drive by postings. There will probably be a post in the next few hours along the lines of "Oh my god I can't believe APUG is going digital!" :confused:Analog Photography Users Group now wants to jabber about digital? So sad..EC
"Oh my god I can't believe APUG is going digital!" :confused:
I hope you didn't interpret my post as, "us and them," I find that a pointless and tiresome notion too. Your various sites are a great way to broaden the scope of your online activities to cover new and interesting areas.
Exactly...Film users are not luddites, but taking an elitist and defensive stance can lead to the perception that we are.
Are you referring to this thread or the site? If you are referring to the site then it doesn't sound like you've read the entire thread. Nothing on APUG is changing so I'm not sure I follow you.. These types of threads do tend to generate drive by postings. There will probably be a post in the next few hours along the lines of "Oh my god I can't believe APUG is going digital!" :confused:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?