The pedantic amongst us would say it should be Polaroidisation!
Steve.
Steve (Love you bro, but...) 1776 and again in 1814. Americans have earned the right to use the "z" instead of the Queen's "s".
The pedantic amongst us would say it should be Polaroidisation!
Steve.
They are Ken but they look like something made by dissidents in the former East Germany http://www.engadget.com/2014/12/25/kodak-smartphone-bullitt/, they'll have to look a lot more sexy if they're going to actually sell any.Kodak Is Making Android Phones Now Because Sure, Why Not I Guess?
Eric Limer, for Gizmodo online, December 26, 2014
"The companynow little more than a name to be slapped on products from all kinds of no-name manufacturers..."
"If this sound vaguely familiar, it's because Polaroid has gone down this same road to little success, lending its name to a series of entirely unremarkable Android tablets. There's an outside chance these new Kodak devices might be worth a damn, but it's far more likely they'll just be sad reminders of how much those little yellow boxes used to mean to us."
Poor Fluffy the Cat is really starting to smell...
Well done, Tony.
Ken
Perhaps they can license the name for toilet paper too - a brand we can trust![]()
Steve (Love you bro, but...) 1776 and again in 1814. Americans have earned the right to use the "z" instead of the Queen's "s".
Basically if you see a product in a store and it has a brand that you recognize it is probably made by someone else under licence.
Westinghouse is a good example. I did some subcontracted work for part of the old Westinghouse company several years back
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westinghouse_Rail_Systems
...now all subsumed into Siemens.
Everyone remembered the name but recently couldn't think what on earth they did other than vague memories of seeing the name on fridges. Very few people seem to remember the guy who invented the railway air brake nigh on 150 years ago.

So we got in that club:
Polaroid, AgfaPhoto and Kodak
Any more members?
Perhaps they can license the name for toilet paper too - a brand we can trust![]()
Rollei seems to be well along the way.
I can't remember where I bought this but I thought it was cute. It's a TP dispenser. It's not Kodak-branded but it's very reminiscent of the look of old Kodak Gold packaging. Just trying to keep in the spirit of things.![]()
Rick / Steve, thanks guys. Its funny I never used to care that much about trains but more recently have started to appreciate their role in our industrial heritage thanks to visits to the historic railways at Swanage and East Somerset.
Umm... being someone who has historically appreciated Moog auto parts, I hope the quality is at least the same. I've learned to be leery when companies change or license-out their names like this.Hey, why make film when you can make money instead, right? The new mode of business. That would be like having a community darkroom and paying the royalties to name it the Ansel Adams Studios (for example's sake).
We have actually seen restructuring somewhat similar in affect to this in the automotive aftermarket for a few years. We sell parts made by the manufacturing companies that comprise Federal Mogul. Now, some of the names are lower profile names. The name for chassis parts is Moog and most folks in the parts business have recognized that name for years. So Fed Mog simply moved a couple more brands under the Moog name for better brand recognition.
Great movie. Notice the tubes they stood in for deceleration - later adopted as Star Trek's transporters (though the transporter is not unlike the disintegrator-reintegrator of The Fly).I kind of likes the synthesizer on Forbidden Planet, but it wasn't a Moog. They came along 10 years later.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
