fingel said:To me, this would be the ultimate back country vehicle.But, until I have the millions to purchase one, I will have to settle for taking my car and then walking/hiking to where I want to go.
Any pictures?EricR said:My favorite ride is my 71 VW hippy van. Has the pop top and a big happy face on the front.
Actually, Juan, it is more than rumours on the Escape Hybrid... they are coming out soon as a 2005 model - at least here in Canada. As I said, I can't wait to have an Eplorer Sport Trac hybrid, though.juan said:Rumor has it that Ford is planning a hybrid version of the Escape SUV.
juan
jdef said:You're all thinking too small. Think ULF!
RAP Do I really need 4wd said:IMHO, unless you're planning to go off-road (meaning in the woods), or are planning to climb Mount Wahington in a snow storm, you really don't need 4x4. I had a Jeep Cherokee 4x4 for a few years and, really, I never went anywhere where a 2x4 couldn't have taken me- save maybe 1 or 2 times over a 4-year period. If you stay on roads, winter or summer, 2x4 is sufficient no matter what the "trend" is these days where those fancy 4x4s (you know the ones that never even see dirt roads, let alone the deep woods?). You will save much $$$ on purchase, insurance, repairs, and fuel if you go 2x4.
A B2000 or B3000 Mazda is likely a good option in your case. A Ranger would be second but if you can afford it and are planning a long term relationship with your truck, then the Toyota is likely the one to come out first in the reliability and longevity game.
Donald Miller said:My '95 Toyota 4WD has 249,000 miles. The only problem has been brakes and head gaskets (taken care of by Toyota at their expense at 184,000 mi). So to answer the question are they really that good...Yep!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?