What I'm saying is: it seems that the less technology is involved, the more I like my photographs.
When I was shooting digital, my photos were awful. Shooting thousands of frames, I didn't manage to make one memorable picture.
Moving to an advanced analog SLR, my photos suddenly started getting better. I actually liked the results I was getting. I guess the greatest thing about analog is that you cannot evaluate your shots immediately after taking them.
Then, recently, I acquired an all-mechanical Minolta 7s. I threw out the battery and guessposured everything. Not every picture I take is well-exposed, but I am finally making photographs that I would dare to show to other people.
What I'm saying is: it seems that the less technology is involved, the more I like my photographs. I was wondering, am I the only one who has experienced this? It doesn't make sense, and yet it's true. I'm not a purist who despises technology and I love my Canon Eos SLR, but my all-mechanical 7s with fixed lens makes better photos! How is this possible, and does this mean I should revert to neolithic drawings in order to fully express myself artistically?
I fully agree, I have never used digital, but 3 years ago I was using modern, autofocus, programe exposure, all the most up to date,modern cameras,both mf and 35mm, but 3 years ago I was at a car boot sale and bought an old agfa sillite, thought it might look good on the shelf, and then decided to put a film though and wow,then I started collecting working classic cameras, folders,riged body,tlr,fro 1938 to 1960 and I am producing some of the best work I have ever done on these old uns, and would not go back,Richard
My point is that if you're a good photographer, you'll get good results with or without technology. Photography itself is a very technology-dependent art, even with film. The camera draws the photograph, your hand does not. That's something a lot of people here have not come to terms with.
My point is that if you're a good photographer, you'll get good results with or without technology.
The relationship between technology and good images is like relationship between lingerie and good sex.
When I was shooting digital, my photos were awful. Shooting thousands of frames, I didn't manage to make one memorable picture.
The relationship between technology and good images is like relationship between lingerie and good sex.
Picture quality has NOTHING to do with shooting film or digital....
I agree to a point. I can't imagine coating my own class plates or mixing my own emulsions. I do think as technology advances, it takes away what makes us human.
Digital cameras makes me shoot more carelessly.
Photography itself is a very technology-dependent art, even with film. The camera draws the photograph, your hand does not. That's something a lot of people here have not come to terms with.
The mind draws the photograph, not the technology. The camera is simply used to record it, if technically feasible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?