Yeah, stores can be hit or miss too. I bought a Hasselblad 500 C/M from a well-known store in Southern California that was supposed to be in perfect operating condition but had a bad light leak. Easy to fix, but annoying nonetheless (they never did send the replacement roll of film that they offered). I bought a Nikon FT3 from another well known store in Northern California and it had a mechanical fault. They happily refunded my money in full with no hassle. Still, it's annoying/disappointing to get a camera that is advertised as being in working order and it's not.I visited a camera store in San Fran in Cow Hollow.. they had two pristine Rollei 35 SEs. Said both just had a CLA. I checked them over, both had shutters that acted as if on B at 1/15 and under. They acted surprised..
(I've seen this issue on every freakin Rollei 35 that I have checked out. Done looking for one because prices now are sky high so not worth it to me to pay that and then have to get it repaired)
I just received a "mint", "no fog" lens from Japan from one of the newer dealers there. It was very hazy, so therefore not mint. I really don't know how they thought they would get away with that. Maybe it was haze free when they listed it, and it developed it during transit? (joke)
Anyway, back it went.
Terms like "mint" or "nearly mint" or anything with "++++" attached to it are suspect now. I'll stick to the few old-timers that I have bought from before - sometimes the price is a little higher, but they've never mis-represented the condition.
My experience with the Japanese sellers is that the headline is meaningless.
But the body of the description usually contains accurate information.
Correct. Usually. Their rating scale is accurate too, if you understand how its calibrated
Mint= not mint at all
very excellent=very well used, with plenty of evidence of it
excellent = KEH "bargain", ie maybe usable, maybe not.
good= junk
junk= boat anchor
To be fair, you are missing the top ratings on the Japanese ebay scale:
Never used = failed QC at factory, meant to be crushed and thrown into landfill
Open box = see excellent condition, but box looks like new
Like new = returned item due to jammed shutter.
Like new - = no dents, fungus has been removed
Mint ++ = the body looks mint if you don't turn it over, minor fungus only in the viewfinder
Mint + = sorta mint but with minor fungus that would not make any difference, maybe
Mint= not mint at all
very excellent=very well used, with plenty of evidence of it
excellent = KEH "bargain", ie maybe usable, maybe not.
good= junk
junk= boat anchor
... is that seller transparency is often quite hazy and buyer expectations are often too enthusiastic.The issue with 'freshly CLAd' cameras on the popular auction site...
There are probably a variety of reasons for that, but covering the high cost of eBay seller fees is definitely one of them.I'm not sure about the situation in the USA, but here in the UK some eBay sellers post higher than market value prices, going from what you'd pay at a conventional photographic dealer.
I'm not sure about the situation in the USA, but here in the UK some eBay sellers post higher than market value prices, going from what you'd pay at a conventional photographic dealer.
Having tinkered on many cameras.. A "clean and lube" is the easy part. 9/10 times it is just the slow speed escapement that just needs to be cleaned and everything just works.
It is the "adjust" that is difficult without specialized equipment. Without that, even the most experienced technician is worthless. And this is what you are really paying for. The last of the good repair shops have all the original tools and test equipment to put a camera back into factory specs or better. And they will warranty their work for a period of time.
Some of these ebay merchants may be ex technicians, you never know.
These ebay "clas" are probably ok , but I would not pay a premium for them unless they warranty for 6 months. Buying anything used is a gamble.
For some buyers that is the price of convenience. For others, the price of ignorance (not knowing all of the facts and options)I think most of the Mamiya 6's would be selling for $50-100 bucks at auction, but most are asking twice that. And I guess they get it, eventually?
some of the ebay sellers can also be guys like you who have been tinkering and learning over the years and do fix more or less of a camera or lens.
Does this 'more or less' mean I will get a perfectly functioning camera, an invoice and a 6 month warranty (if the CLA is stated, of course)? Because then I might go for it!
If you're buying blind on eBay, you're going to get screwed sooner or later..
not really, if there is a legitimate issue ebay always sides with the buyer. Doesn't matter if the seller said 'no returns' in the ad. If what you get didn't match the description, ebay will be on your side.
Been through this a bunch of times. Never had a problem returning stuff.
Did he say he replaced them with new light seals?I was just looking at a listing with "replaced light seals," complete with photos of the light seals, which were deteriorating and half missing.
Good point! - Maybe he just replaced them with old light seals from another camera!Did he say he replaced them with new light seals?
What's your time worth? How many better opportunities did you miss while playing pass-the-parcel?
Or, you could actually do the research, know what you're buying, know what to look for, and what to avoid, and get it right the first time.
On the plus side, the US Postal Service probably appreciates your business (although I wish they'd dig my latest purchase out of whatever snowbank it's sitting in, and deliver it).
made sure to get a screenshot of the seller's CLA recept before I bought. When I tried the camera out, focus was misaligned and the backplate was putting a noteworthy scratch in the film
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?