- Joined
- May 26, 2018
- Messages
- 366
For what it's worth, 531/2 is also lighter and easier to carry around than some 35 mm SLRs. I love mine.the 531 can sell for 3x or 4x what I paid for this one.
Don't glue or screw anything into or onto the camera. It will always look bad and you will always regret it in a multitude of ways (and not admit it to yourself).
If you absolutely insist on having an RF on the camera, find a flash bracket to screw into the tripod socket. It has a shoe that will fit your RF units. And you can use the case (or not).
If you have an iPhone 12 or newer it will have a LiDAR that you can user with the LiDAR Measuring app. More than enough precise up five meters, after which even a casual guess is good enough @ f3.5.
Otherwise cultivate a keen sense of distance. It's a very nice skill to have. I can nail 1.2 meters down to a T. And other distances down to plus/minus ten centimetres.
That's a film that is ISO250, or so, which is wrongly sold as ISO400. Even the data sheet shows that not only D76, but Microphen can't squeeze 400 ISO out of it. It was my worst "fast" film, ever.Actually, your Foma at EI 800 w/ a MF camera looks a heck of a lot better than the time I tried it in 35mm. That's a film that loves EI 250, at least in D76/F76 developers.
My experience has been that the rangefinder markings aren't very accurate, FWIW. In the past I always used fast film and stopped it way down. Nowadays I use the hyperfocal red dot and avoid subjects that are closer than 25 feet. They were tourist cameras and I've come full circle - I use them like tourist cameras.
For what it's worth, 531/2 is also lighter and easier to carry around than some 35 mm SLRs. I love mine.
Don't glue or screw anything into or onto the camera. It will always look bad and you will always regret it in a multitude of ways (and not admit it to yourself).
You're likely to be pleasantly surprised by the sharpness of the lens, especially if you stop it down and use a tripod. I have three of these little guys - coated Novar, uncoated Tessar and coated Tessar. Wonderful little cameras.
Actually, your Foma at EI 800 w/ a MF camera looks a heck of a lot better than the time I tried it in 35mm. That's a film that loves EI 250, at least in D76/F76 developers.
It’s exactly the small size that makes it ideal for a tripod.I have been playing with it only handhold, I won't carry a tripod with a small thing like that, and yes it's not bad...
yes in fact I decided there's no point to install a shoe somewhere. The Blik RF is very ergonomic, I attached a wrist lanyard to it, can hold and measure with right hand. And anyway it's not like I would need to focus and shoot fast.
I also found the case to be convenient for carrying around, this excludes attached accessory.
If you have an iPhone 12 or never, there is a LiDAR in it. The LiDAR measuring app will let you use it for measuring distance.
The Light Meter app will let you meter as well.
A laser rangefinder like the Leica ones are also nice for use. Especially indoors.
What is really needed is a small spot meter like thing with rangefinder build in, to wear as a necklace.
Doesn’t exist as far as I know.
Nothing wrong with any of those photos! Folders rule.
If you have the phone with you, which you have, bringing something extra is less "minimalist".I am a minimalist: the less electronic the better. A Blik RF is really nice and needs no battery. For metering I use an old Sekonic L-228 with zoom, angle of view 28 to 8, I use it mostly at 8, and measure couple areas, so not spot yet very convenient, and it has a calculator dial. And much smaller than a spotmeter. I also have a Polaris with the 10 degrees additional eye.
I have seen often in Germany old Entfernungsmesser mit Belichtungsmesser, under name Combimeter. They look like the Watameter or Pollux RF but chunkier. They have a 3rd eye, and another wheel with f values, times and din values, on top. But I never was interested to buy one, they must use of course a chunk of selenium (no battery).
These Novar Ikonta seem to have been produced all with 1 to 1/250 or 1/300 shutters, only the Tessar come in faster Compur 1-1/500.
yes, the Novar lens seems capable. Basically that's the point about how worth this Ikonta is. Have in mind I bought this because 1) I was curious about 4,5x6 in such a small size, instead of my Bronica S2 2) it was selling near me for cheap, I could have a look before buying, no postage, no toll.
But Ikon(ta) in my mind meant Tessar or Xenar, I didn't know at all of Novar and there's not much online about it. On auctions sites, the Tessar models sell at 2x to 3x times more than the Novar ones. So probably yet another instance of market speculation out of control around a known name.
I have been searching online about similar folders, most of them have coupled rangefinders, in Germany the Baldaxette and the Weltur, and in Japan with or without RF,Konica, Minolta, Petri. In case I would buy another folder in this size I would decide as per the shutter. These Novar Ikonta seem to have been produced all with 1 to 1/250 or 1/300 shutters, only the Tessar come in faster Compur 1-1/5
The Novar isn't any specific design, but were generally triplet a-stigmatics purchased from 3rd party lens manufacturers throughout the years. The Novars on the 1952 523/16 are of postwar build and much better than the Novars of the 1948 521/16, which I suspect were pre-war leftovers. They do seem every bit as good as the Tessar within a stop either way of f/8, but get a bit mushy in the corners as they open up. At larger apertures the 521 shows a lot of vignetting which isn't present in the 523. Some people say Tessars don't perform well in the corners wide open, but I haven't shot any of mine that way often enough to form an opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?