due the shelf life of the chemistry.
I get > 12 months out of Fuji mini lab chemistry. Actually a lot more, but let's keep it conservative. Would that suffice? For me it does, sufficiently so to not bother with labs anymore.
due the shelf life of the chemistry.
Is that 12 months after you mix it up? If so, that's better than what the manufacturers recommend for most of the b&w chemistry I've tried.I get > 12 months out of Fuji mini lab chemistry. Actually a lot more, but let's keep it conservative. Would that suffice? For me it does, sufficiently so to not bother with labs anymore.
Is that 12 months after you mix it up?
And is "Fuji mini lab chemistry" available in a home-use kit with instructions for small tank use?
What is frustrating for me is not the cost of C-41 processing at my local lab, but the quality. There is a camera shop in my hometown that runs an old mini lab, but the the results are often terrible (underdeveloped). I don't know if they are skipping maintenance or not running proper quality control, or what. Even when they know they have a significant quality problem, they continue to take your money and process your film, poorly. Worse, the lab guy is very defensive which makes any attempt to discuss quality problems almost impossible. His attitude is, "We are the last working lab in the area, so where else are you going to go?"
How do you make your local lab do their job?
I process my own b&w, but I don't shoot enough color to make home C-41 practical, due the shelf life of the chemistry.
When you say "C41 is C41" does that mean I can expect the Fuji, Rollei, Bellini, Arista, CineStill and Unicolor kits to all have pretty much the same results and shelf life?
Are you saying they process C-41 color in about an hour but C-41 b&w takes longer? Interesting. Does anyone know of any reason why a lab would process b&w C-41 separately from their color C-41? I thought one of the main reasons for b&w C-41 was so it could be processed "normally" by C-41 color labs.We are very lucky here in the Fraser Valley. The Chilliwack London Drugs has an in-house lab where they do film processing and have a variety of film and products. Their film is around $8 per roll. Color usually is done in about an hour. The C-41 black and white sometimes takes until the next day. I have been getting 4x6 prints while I am relearning the craft. Once I get back into it I will just get a cd with jpegs. Digital format is a lot easier to edit and use for me.
Are you saying they process C-41 color in about an hour but C-41 b&w takes longer? Interesting. Does anyone know of any reason why a lab would process b&w C-41 any differently than color C-41? I thought one of the main reasons for b&w C-41 was so it could be processed "normally" by C-41 color labs.
would be great if it was as cheap or available as back in the good old days.. same with everything..
shoot them all! fun as, and that's usually the point.
Freestyle has both C41 and RA4 as well as RA4 paper. A few things are out of stock if you're stuck on a certain brand, but they do have both C41 and RA4 complete kits in stock. Likewise with paper - some combinations of surface and size are out of stock (no 16x20 in glossy or lustre - 16x20 is showing in stock only in matte) but they have paper. I didn't bother checking anywhere else because they have it.Looking at my Wards Photography Catalog 1952 color film is still cheap, in the 50s and 60s my parents shot one roll of color a year. In my area to shot a roll of 36, process and print totals about $40. I was going to process but could not find C41 or R4 chemistry. The supply chain might have caught up by now, but I'm going to focus on black and white and shoot the digital for color.
I think this just needs to be accepted up front. The peak of 35mm film use resulted in a situation where prices were low and availability almost universal. If that was your normal, and it was for me, then anything else will always feel expensive. However, top tier cameras and lenses were still very expensive - yet people bought them. Even back then my amateur budget couldn’t afford the tools and materials aimed at professionals. I remember one shop in town that didn’t want to interact with you if you weren’t prepared to drop a pile of money on the table. Unsurprisingly, they folded as soon as digital arrived.
Today I have a kit I could not have dreamed of in the 1990s, all for pennies on the dollar. Well, not the M3… but otherwise it’s true.
Looking beyond photography, every time I go to Moab I see dozens of toy hauler rigs that make my camera and film budget look like pocket change. One-ton mega-cab pickups with tuned diesel engines to haul giant fifth wheel campers and a second trailer loaded with side-by-sides or whatnot. How much is that racing down the highway at 85mph? $150K? Easily. $250K? Not out of the question. Nothing cheap about that hobby. A set of tires and rims for the truck would cost more than a new film Leica. Fuel costs must be atrocious now. But they still keep doing it.
Good comparison. I know that less urban areas pay less but here in metro Atlanta even fast food starts at north of $10/hr, more like $12 last time I talked to anyone working in that. Given that almost every place I go now has help wanted signs, I expect they may pay a bit more now. A roll of color film could be paid for by an hour of burger flipping. It still can. There was an in between period, as people have pointed out, when prices were quite low compared to both before and after. That time is gone. I wish it wasn't as well, but it is.My late 1960's-early 1970's high school time affects my judgement on this. A 20 exposure roll of Kodacolor-X cost about 1 hour at my minimum wage fast-food job, cheapest processing about 1.5 hours. Kodachrome total was about the same, subsidized by all the home movies going through the labs. E4 (Ektachrome/Dynachrome) was about 20% more. I learned BW lab work because chemistry was available and the school had the equipment.
There was a minilab boom in the 1990's as others have pointed out, cutting prices on both film and processing. Now we're about back at the old ratio of minimum wage to color film roll price, though E6 is hard to find. If you find a youngster with interest, help them out with lab skills.
Pretty much the dame results, yes. Shelf life may be another matter; I can't couch for that. I only know Fuji stores well and I hear so does Kodak. I wouldn't be surprised if the others could last long as well under optimal conditions, but I don't know.
What is frustrating for me is not the cost of C-41 processing at my local lab, but the quality. There is a camera shop in my hometown that runs an old mini lab, but the the results are often terrible (underdeveloped). I don't know if they are skipping maintenance or not running proper quality control, or what. Even when they know they have a significant quality problem, they continue to take your money and process your film, poorly. Worse, the lab guy is very defensive which makes any attempt to discuss quality problems almost impossible. His attitude is, "We are the last working lab in the area, so where else are you going to go?"
How do you make your local lab do their job?
I process my own b&w, but I don't shoot enough color to make home C-41 practical, due the shelf life of the chemistry.
Worse, the lab guy is very defensive which makes any attempt to discuss quality problems almost impossible. His attitude is, "We are the last working lab in the area, so where else are you going to go?"
Bad practices and bad business should not survive. Find another place, there are good labs you can send your film to and they deliver the negatives back plus scans if needed (sometimes downloadable via internet).
Sadly, I have to agree. I have run into the same situation here in Southern California. The commercial C-41 developing that I seem to keep running into is scratching the negatives, but the digital software used for the machine prints hides the defects. The lab has been in total denial about it, despite a couple of damning tests. This has driven me into developing my own. I'd rather support a lab with decent QC, but am tired of having my photos damaged.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |