The cost of color film and processing

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,708
Messages
2,779,630
Members
99,684
Latest member
delahp
Recent bookmarks
0

runswithsizzers

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
1,755
Location
SW Missouri, USA
Format
Multi Format
I get > 12 months out of Fuji mini lab chemistry. Actually a lot more, but let's keep it conservative. Would that suffice? For me it does, sufficiently so to not bother with labs anymore.
Is that 12 months after you mix it up? If so, that's better than what the manufacturers recommend for most of the b&w chemistry I've tried.

And is "Fuji mini lab chemistry" available in a home-use kit with instructions for small tank use?

Is this the chemistry you have been using <Fuji C-41 X-Press Kit>? I looked at the instructions for that kit which suggest the developer should be used within 6 weeks if stored in full glass bottles.

Looks like I've shot about 14 rolls of in the past 12 months, and only 3 of those were C-41. However, I do have a couple more rolls of color C-41 as well as some Ilford XP2 Super I'd like to shoot in the near future. I am guessing that *IF* I was willing to use XP2 Super as my only b&w film, I could probably use enough of a C-41 kit to make it worth while, but there are a few other conventional b&w films I'd like to try first.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,633
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Is that 12 months after you mix it up?

Yes, it keeps better that way than the concentrate, especially the developer. Fix and bleach last very very long in the original packaging.

And is "Fuji mini lab chemistry" available in a home-use kit with instructions for small tank use?

C41 is C41. Develop 3m15 at 100F, the rest is less critical. Mixing as per the manufacturer's datasheet. Fuji's docs are a bit hard to find, although this has improved.

No I don't use the press kit although I'm pretty sure you could get the same lifetime from e.g. the Fuji hunt press kit if you want to buy a smaller volume and accept a higher per-gallon price. Just ensure that you keep the developer in entirely full, glass bottles with a well-fitting and tightly screwed on cap.

But your color volume does sound really low indeed; I'm not sure if it's worthwhile to get chemistry for it. At 3 rolls/year you could even see if there's a better lab elsewhere on the planet and have them do everything e.g. once per year. I don't shoot miles of color either, which is why long-lasting chemistry is vital for me, but I still easily shoot ten times your volume, so it's a different situation.
 

runswithsizzers

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
1,755
Location
SW Missouri, USA
Format
Multi Format
@koraks - Yes, for 3 or 4 rolls per year, sending my C-41 to a distant lab is the most practical. While I don't see my total film volume going much above 15-20 rolls per year, my mix of b&w vs. color could change. And if I decide to go with XP2 Super as my main b&w film, then most of my 15-20 rolls per year would be C-41.

When you say "C41 is C41" does that mean I can expect the Fuji, Rollei, Bellini, Arista, CineStill and Unicolor kits to all have pretty much the same results and shelf life?

I can get a 1 liter kit from Arista that will do 8 rolls for about $25(USD).
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,338
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
What is frustrating for me is not the cost of C-41 processing at my local lab, but the quality. There is a camera shop in my hometown that runs an old mini lab, but the the results are often terrible (underdeveloped). I don't know if they are skipping maintenance or not running proper quality control, or what. Even when they know they have a significant quality problem, they continue to take your money and process your film, poorly. Worse, the lab guy is very defensive which makes any attempt to discuss quality problems almost impossible. His attitude is, "We are the last working lab in the area, so where else are you going to go?"

How do you make your local lab do their job?

I process my own b&w, but I don't shoot enough color to make home C-41 practical, due the shelf life of the chemistry.

I am sorry that your local place does not do their job well. I use Sammy's Camera which is local and they do a very good job, returning the film uncut as requested, with a summary print of all the prints and one or two prints per frame as ordered. Since your local place is not up to snuff, and if there are no other local places, consider sending a roll to Samy's Camera on Fairfax and see if you like their work.

 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,633
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
When you say "C41 is C41" does that mean I can expect the Fuji, Rollei, Bellini, Arista, CineStill and Unicolor kits to all have pretty much the same results and shelf life?

Pretty much the dame results, yes. Shelf life may be another matter; I can't couch for that. I only know Fuji stores well and I hear so does Kodak. I wouldn't be surprised if the others could last long as well under optimal conditions, but I don't know.
 

Larryc001

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Messages
122
Location
Western
Format
Multi Format
We are very lucky here in the Fraser Valley. The Chilliwack London Drugs has an in-house lab where they do film processing and have a variety of film and products. Their film is around $8 per roll. Color usually is done in about an hour. The C-41 black and white sometimes takes until the next day. I have been getting 4x6 prints while I am relearning the craft. Once I get back into it I will just get a cd with jpegs. Digital format is a lot easier to edit and use for me.
 

runswithsizzers

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
1,755
Location
SW Missouri, USA
Format
Multi Format
We are very lucky here in the Fraser Valley. The Chilliwack London Drugs has an in-house lab where they do film processing and have a variety of film and products. Their film is around $8 per roll. Color usually is done in about an hour. The C-41 black and white sometimes takes until the next day. I have been getting 4x6 prints while I am relearning the craft. Once I get back into it I will just get a cd with jpegs. Digital format is a lot easier to edit and use for me.
Are you saying they process C-41 color in about an hour but C-41 b&w takes longer? Interesting. Does anyone know of any reason why a lab would process b&w C-41 separately from their color C-41? I thought one of the main reasons for b&w C-41 was so it could be processed "normally" by C-41 color labs.

Also, be sure you get your negatives back with your CD. Even if you can't think of any reason for having the negatives right now, there may come a day when you will want them. Lab scaned JPEGs are not known for being state-of-the-art files; that is, there is a lot of information on the negatives that probably did not get captured in the lab JPEGs. Having the negatives means you can get much of the missing quality later, if you decide you need it.
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,836
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Are you saying they process C-41 color in about an hour but C-41 b&w takes longer? Interesting. Does anyone know of any reason why a lab would process b&w C-41 any differently than color C-41? I thought one of the main reasons for b&w C-41 was so it could be processed "normally" by C-41 color labs.

London Drugs has 79 stores, and a significant number of them still process film on site. Each site is a separate minilab, and that means they have a lot of staff, and their experience and knowledge, while generally good, varies a bit.
The film process is identical, but the scanning and printing probably require different pre-sets in their equipment. Most likely they batch together C-41 black and white, and they may have certain staff do it more than others.
In many cases, those staff also have duties outside the photolab parts of the stores - London Drugs sells a lot of different things outside of its pharmacy business, including TVs and audio and cel phones and computers and groceries and toasters and ......
 

Larryc001

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Messages
122
Location
Western
Format
Multi Format
I did notice that when they print b&w they seem to use the same printer as color, but put a roll of different paper in it. They told me the reason they take various amounts of time is because they need to get a batch of film together and then process it all together. It seems to go pretty fast though.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,836
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
All London Drugs photo printers print inkjet from digital files, but they might be using a particular paper for the black and white prints - I've never thought to ask.
I don't think they separate the C41 films out - colour and black and white - but they do process them in batches.
A friend of mine is in the process of retiring from there after working in their photolabs for decades. He was in fact, in charge of implementing them in a large number of the stores, although in more recent years he was working in one particular store.
London Drugs still has one store that does 35mm E6, and owns a lab in Winnipeg - half way across the country - where they develop normal black and white film.
 

Larryc001

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Messages
122
Location
Western
Format
Multi Format
Yes I had a choice to get the c41 or get regular b&w film. But I didn’t want to wait for it to be processed in winterpeg. But I may go that route once I get going.
 

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
would be great if it was as cheap or available as back in the good old days.. same with everything..

shoot them all! fun as, and that's usually the point.

The good old days weren't really all that good. If you plug today's costs into an inflation calculator and go backward and then compare to the costs then I'd say it's more like costs are finally catching back up after a long cheap period.

I don't like it either, but "it is what it is." I've been mailing out color this entire century, don't know what padded bags the OP even meant. I just put 35mm in the plastic can, 120, heck, I've just sealed it with the tape and sent it like that, dropped them into one of the padded mailers from the office supply section at Wal-Mart, and sent it on its way. Maybe I'm too casual but on the other hand I never had a problem with doing that and think others tend to worry too much and over think these things.
 

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Looking at my Wards Photography Catalog 1952 color film is still cheap, in the 50s and 60s my parents shot one roll of color a year. In my area to shot a roll of 36, process and print totals about $40. I was going to process but could not find C41 or R4 chemistry. The supply chain might have caught up by now, but I'm going to focus on black and white and shoot the digital for color.
Freestyle has both C41 and RA4 as well as RA4 paper. A few things are out of stock if you're stuck on a certain brand, but they do have both C41 and RA4 complete kits in stock. Likewise with paper - some combinations of surface and size are out of stock (no 16x20 in glossy or lustre - 16x20 is showing in stock only in matte) but they have paper. I didn't bother checking anywhere else because they have it.

I haven't lived anywhere I could buy paper and chemicals over the counter - well, EVER. When I lived in TN only one store within 100 miles had a limited selection and it was hard for me to get to when I was in high school. Later in the 90s I COULD, but I had far better selection and better prices just ordering from NY or Freestyle, which is what I did. By the time I moved to the Atlanta area AND got back into photography, none here either at least out in the suburbs and I do not drive into Atlanta proper any time I can avoid it. Besides, the Internet was now around and I could order any time I wanted, which often IS the middle of the night for me, and have Santa's magic UPS or FedEx sleigh drop it right at my door sooner than I could have found time to go get it anyway.
 
Last edited:

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
I think this just needs to be accepted up front. The peak of 35mm film use resulted in a situation where prices were low and availability almost universal. If that was your normal, and it was for me, then anything else will always feel expensive. However, top tier cameras and lenses were still very expensive - yet people bought them. Even back then my amateur budget couldn’t afford the tools and materials aimed at professionals. I remember one shop in town that didn’t want to interact with you if you weren’t prepared to drop a pile of money on the table. Unsurprisingly, they folded as soon as digital arrived.

Today I have a kit I could not have dreamed of in the 1990s, all for pennies on the dollar. Well, not the M3… but otherwise it’s true.

Looking beyond photography, every time I go to Moab I see dozens of toy hauler rigs that make my camera and film budget look like pocket change. One-ton mega-cab pickups with tuned diesel engines to haul giant fifth wheel campers and a second trailer loaded with side-by-sides or whatnot. How much is that racing down the highway at 85mph? $150K? Easily. $250K? Not out of the question. Nothing cheap about that hobby. A set of tires and rims for the truck would cost more than a new film Leica. Fuel costs must be atrocious now. But they still keep doing it.

Totally THIS.
 

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
My late 1960's-early 1970's high school time affects my judgement on this. A 20 exposure roll of Kodacolor-X cost about 1 hour at my minimum wage fast-food job, cheapest processing about 1.5 hours. Kodachrome total was about the same, subsidized by all the home movies going through the labs. E4 (Ektachrome/Dynachrome) was about 20% more. I learned BW lab work because chemistry was available and the school had the equipment.

There was a minilab boom in the 1990's as others have pointed out, cutting prices on both film and processing. Now we're about back at the old ratio of minimum wage to color film roll price, though E6 is hard to find. If you find a youngster with interest, help them out with lab skills.
Good comparison. I know that less urban areas pay less but here in metro Atlanta even fast food starts at north of $10/hr, more like $12 last time I talked to anyone working in that. Given that almost every place I go now has help wanted signs, I expect they may pay a bit more now. A roll of color film could be paid for by an hour of burger flipping. It still can. There was an in between period, as people have pointed out, when prices were quite low compared to both before and after. That time is gone. I wish it wasn't as well, but it is.
 

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Pretty much the dame results, yes. Shelf life may be another matter; I can't couch for that. I only know Fuji stores well and I hear so does Kodak. I wouldn't be surprised if the others could last long as well under optimal conditions, but I don't know.

Separate bleach and fix will last longer than bleach-fix aka "blix." Get a separate bleach if storage life is a concern. But otherwise, I also found back when I did color that it lasts far longer than the literature says.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,338
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
It is much more convenient to take my film to Samy's Camera, a 20 minute drive each way twice, than to develop the film and set up the darkroom to print one or two copies of 12 or 36 photographs on 5"x5" or 4"x6" paper respectively. Even if I have a lot of film from a trip, I would rather get the photographs in a week than develop and make one or two sets of prints that will mostly not be enlarged later on. To me it is just the cost of doing photography.
 

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,516
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
What is frustrating for me is not the cost of C-41 processing at my local lab, but the quality. There is a camera shop in my hometown that runs an old mini lab, but the the results are often terrible (underdeveloped). I don't know if they are skipping maintenance or not running proper quality control, or what. Even when they know they have a significant quality problem, they continue to take your money and process your film, poorly. Worse, the lab guy is very defensive which makes any attempt to discuss quality problems almost impossible. His attitude is, "We are the last working lab in the area, so where else are you going to go?"

How do you make your local lab do their job?

I process my own b&w, but I don't shoot enough color to make home C-41 practical, due the shelf life of the chemistry.

The only way I can think of, to make a lab do their job correctly , is to vote with your feet and wallet.
It's a pity they are so sloppy because it is just as easy to do it correctly as badly. These ones give minilabs a bad name.
The guys defensive attitude is poor customer service so I suppose if they don't care about the customer, how can you expect them to care about your film. Very sad.
 

halfaman

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
1,386
Location
Bilbao
Format
Multi Format
Worse, the lab guy is very defensive which makes any attempt to discuss quality problems almost impossible. His attitude is, "We are the last working lab in the area, so where else are you going to go?"

Bad practices and bad business should not survive. Find another place, there are good labs you can send your film to and they deliver the negatives back plus scans if needed (sometimes downloadable via internet).
 

martinola

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
22
Location
Covina
Format
Multi Format
Bad practices and bad business should not survive. Find another place, there are good labs you can send your film to and they deliver the negatives back plus scans if needed (sometimes downloadable via internet).

Sadly, I have to agree. I have run into the same situation here in Southern California. The commercial C-41 developing that I seem to keep running into is scratching the negatives, but the digital software used for the machine prints hides the defects. The lab has been in total denial about it, despite a couple of damning tests. This has driven me into developing my own. I'd rather support a lab with decent QC, but am tired of having my photos damaged.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
Going to drop off 14 rolls of C41 I just shot (120 & 35) at Paul's Photo in Torrance.
It's not going to be cheap but I do dev only.
No-one is making us do this, so I don't see the point of complaining about it. Shooting film - color and B&W - brings me pleasure and often makes me money so I'll be doing it as long as it is available.

We decide how we spend our money - I think I've mentioned this before but my most modern car is from 2013. I don't go out for coffee. Don't smoke. Hardly ever drink. Don't go to football games. Hardly ever go to the movies etc etc.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
Sadly, I have to agree. I have run into the same situation here in Southern California. The commercial C-41 developing that I seem to keep running into is scratching the negatives, but the digital software used for the machine prints hides the defects. The lab has been in total denial about it, despite a couple of damning tests. This has driven me into developing my own. I'd rather support a lab with decent QC, but am tired of having my photos damaged.

What lab?
 

martinola

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
22
Location
Covina
Format
Multi Format
Huss,
This was some years ago. I had been sending the film out thru a camera store. Supposedly, it was going to a lab that proudly proclaimed that they use "dip and dunk" processing, so scratching was impossible. Their prints masked the fine regular scratching due to their use of ICE. I like bigger scans than they do, and I didn't much like the auto clean function on their scanning. As a result, when I scanned the negatives, I kept running into scratching. Finally I ran a half exposed roll thru the process and came up with the same scratching on the stuff that never touched the camera's gate. For all the world, it looked like a badly maintained roller based processor. I switched to sending my film to directly to another lab in the LA area with much the same results. Possibly the small labs were sending each other sub-contracted work to run multiple lines. The problem is when that is done, there are more opportunities for "stonewalling" a QC attempt. Maybe I'm being over-picky, but I sure got better results back in the '80s and 90's. Anyway, I do my own stuff now and am in charge of my own scratching for less money.
 

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,803
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format
I dunno. Freestyle has a Cinestill C41 kit that will do 8 rolls for $30. I'm doing ECN2 with the QWD kit for not much more than that per roll, but the film is much cheaper.

If you can make Kraft Mac and Cheese from the box, you can process B&W film.

If you can process B&W film you can do color from a kit.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom