Photo 05: Focus was set on the trunk of the olive tree, but this one is quite blurry. Probably due to being shot at around f/4.
Photo 15: Focus was set on the trunk, but the bush in front seems sharper. Shot at around f/5.6 or f/8.
Photo 17: The wall is reasonably sharp, but again, the grass seems to be the focal point!
Is there a real issue here, or is this just the signature look of a Tessar lens?
let's say I meter the light and the perfect setting would be1/75 with f/8, and 1/75 is not available and the closest is 1/60, does it work to "cheat" with the lense and move the cursor a bit above f/8 and not quite f/11 to compensate?
would you be so kind to give me some recommended people for the job?
You could try here: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/repair-shops-in-and-out-of-business.210509
And/or use the forum search function to see what comes up.
In this case, I would personally start by just having a look at the camera myself and trying to fix the problem.
Thanks a lot for all your answers, they are very illuminating So I will proceed with getting it CLA'd. I don't know any good address for this, would you be so kind to give me some recommended people for the job?
Thanks!
Pablo
In this case, I would personally start by just having a look at the camera myself and trying to fix the problem.
I can recommend Alex Varas Cameras very highly. https://alexvarascameras.com/ He is in Bilbao, I think there is no customs between Switzerland and the EU. He has done excellent work for me and the cost is modest.
Personally I would NOT fiddle with the camera myself unless I did not mind destroying it during a learning exercise!
Thank you for the recommendation, Chris, I appreciate it.
Dan Daniel is right about checking the rangefinder first, watch out the screws for the infinity of the rangefinder, they can be hard to move and screws are easily spoiled.
After watching the photos I'm starting to think that someone moved something inside the rangefinder trying to adjust the image to infinity but moved the close focus point instead.
No, the III has an entirely different non-prism rangefinder.I don't think that's the same camera, Ron!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?