I just popped over an looked at your posts, very nice.
The tones are very attractive and they look plenty sharp. You have a very distinguished model; he fits the lighting and look perfectly.
Just for the sake of argument, I would enlist his aid again and redo the shots. I would use the same lighting but this time do your three development time tests, instead of just the one.
I agree with 5, 7, 9 as a better spread to determine change. And remember to MARK THE NEGATIVES so you know which is which, nip a corner or have a card with a number at the very edge when you take the picture. It's very frustrating to have a half a dozen negatives and no idea what was what, or so I hear, never having actually made that mistake myself!!! At least not that anyone can prove!