Testing a 35mm film camera

Mansion

A
Mansion

  • 1
  • 2
  • 33
Lake

A
Lake

  • 5
  • 1
  • 32
One cloud, four windmills

D
One cloud, four windmills

  • 2
  • 0
  • 19
Priorities #2

D
Priorities #2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 19
Priorities

D
Priorities

  • 0
  • 0
  • 15

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,017
Messages
2,784,696
Members
99,775
Latest member
Abby Baxter
Recent bookmarks
0

Taz777

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Messages
82
Location
London, UK
Format
Digital
I've got a a couple of new (old) 35mm film cameras now. Without any film loaded the basic functions work fine. However, I want to test out that the film advance mechanism and shutter cocking works without wasting a lot of film.

Is the easiest way to run a roll of 35mm film through one camera and then manually rewind it but not all the way into the cartridge, and then reuse the same exposed roll in the other cameras?
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
Hard to tell without knowing cameras. Are they motor operated or manual?
If I'm into real checking of how it works and it is manual advance, rewind, I'll remove the lens and make marks on each frame while shutter is open on B. This will show if film advance is working correct (frames are whole and spaced).
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,769
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Not a good idea; too easy to screw up and make false assumptions because you flashed the film or scratched it in the multiple loadings of various bodies. The more you handle the film prior to processing, the greater the risk of damage or light fogging...

Ask around for someone who bulk loads cassettes and get them to make a few short loads for you to make individual tests of each camera, or just get a few rolls of cheap Kodak Colorplus 200 for your tests.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
I keep a roll of film in a drawer for just that purpose. If you're just checking the ability to transport film through the camera
if\t's fine. Even if it's for spacing it's OK but to check two cameras different color pencils/pens work.
 
OP
OP

Taz777

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Messages
82
Location
London, UK
Format
Digital
I keep a roll of film in a drawer for just that purpose. If you're just checking the ability to transport film through the camera
if\t's fine. Even if it's for spacing it's OK but to check two cameras different color pencils/pens work.

Yes, it's just for testing that the film is transported through the camera correctly. I was wondering whether I can just reuse an exposed film in several cameras just for this test, as you appear to do. I'm not bothered about getting it developed. I just want to test the mechanical side. Both cameras are manual.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,106
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Be careful with re-using films when you aren't sure whether the cameras are functioning properly.
Before testing subsequent cameras, you should carefully inspect the film to make sure that there aren't any torn or damaged sprockets.
 
OP
OP

Taz777

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Messages
82
Location
London, UK
Format
Digital
Be careful with re-using films when you aren't sure whether the cameras are functioning properly.
Before testing subsequent cameras, you should carefully inspect the film to make sure that there aren't any torn or damaged sprockets.

Okay, understood. It might be better to just buy a few rolls of the cheapest film then.
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,769
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,221
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
I've got a a couple of new (old) 35mm film cameras now. Without any film loaded the basic functions work fine. However, I want to test out that the film advance mechanism and shutter cocking works without wasting a lot of film.

Is the easiest way to run a roll of 35mm film through one camera and then manually rewind it but not all the way into the cartridge, and then reuse the same exposed roll in the other cameras?
Yeah, i have a couple rolls of HP5 that i have had for several years. I use them just as you say.
It's not like they get much use. :smile:
It is also a good way to practice rewinding film, Without Running ti all the way back into the can.
Different cameras (might) sound and feel differently. If you make a few mistakes with your test roll, you will not Fog/Ruin any award winning photos. :cool:
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,106
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Okay, understood. It might be better to just buy a few rolls of the cheapest film then.
No - just check for signs of damage - roll it out by hand through its entire length, look carefully and, if it is undamaged, you can roll it back into the cassette, leaving the leader extended. It may be necessary to trim the end of the leader if the first camera crimped it, as some do.
And be SURE to mark that film as a TEST film.
 

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,572
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I bulk roll film so what I do is roll a cassette of 10 exposures of something cheap like Fomapan and make some test exposures, then process and examine the negatives...scan if I think it's worthwhile.

You could keep one roll of film to waste in "new" cameras but all you'll know is that the winding mechanism works. If you don't bulk roll film, maybe find someone local who does and who can give/sell/trade you some short films. Or as someone mentioned Kodak Color Plus can be had as cheap as chips.
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,072
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
On the exposure testing side, I do a couple things. First I shoot a few bright frames at the highest shutter speed. This is to look for “capping”. If the leading curtain runs slower than the trailing curtain, at the highest speeds a portion of the frame will be unexposed. (Obviously, not useful for leaf shutters.) Then I take a series of shots of the exact same subject, starting with a fast shutter and an open aperture, then each subsequent shot I drop the shutter speed on stop and open the aperture one stop, and I go as far as I can (1000/2, 500/2.8, 250/4, 125/5.6, 60/8, 30/11). The reason I do this is to see if the frames all look equally exposed. It’s far from perfect, but it gives me a sense of whether the shutter speeds are relatively consistent.
 
OP
OP

Taz777

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Messages
82
Location
London, UK
Format
Digital
On the exposure testing side, I do a couple things. First I shoot a few bright frames at the highest shutter speed. This is to look for “capping”. If the leading curtain runs slower than the trailing curtain, at the highest speeds a portion of the frame will be unexposed. (Obviously, not useful for leaf shutters.) Then I take a series of shots of the exact same subject, starting with a fast shutter and an open aperture, then each subsequent shot I drop the shutter speed on stop and open the aperture one stop, and I go as far as I can (1000/2, 500/2.8, 250/4, 125/5.6, 60/8, 30/11). The reason I do this is to see if the frames all look equally exposed. It’s far from perfect, but it gives me a sense of whether the shutter speeds are relatively consistent.

Great advice! Many thanks.
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
I use an old roll of Agfa or Kodachrome film, both bought decades ago. Good idea to check all 36 frames. I acquired a Contessa that advances film properly until frame 26 , and then jams and chews up sprockets. Unfortunately, this was a camera I didn’t test film advice before using.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom