That is similar but not quite it. I really wish I could remember it.
That sort of sounds like unsharp masking.Orton Effect maybe?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orton_(photography)
May be very similar in theory, I'm going to suggest that the magnitude of defocus is generally larger with the Orton Effect. The Orton effects I've seen in practice were used to create a fuzzier look rather than sharper.That sort of sounds like unsharp masking.
... But this method is a digital manipulation hard to achieve by analog means to say the least...
Orton Effect maybe?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orton_(photography)
Well yeah, a bit of a necessity when stacking slide frames/films for projection.Orton Effect uses two distinct exposures.
One way of achieving multiple planes of focus that I've seen used in tabletop photography for advertising is to layer multiple exposures on one sheet of film by lighting only one plane of focus at a time, refocusing between exposures.
So imagine you've got some space-age audio gizmo in the foreground (the thing you're advertising), an audio rack full of equipment in the middle ground, and a black background lit from behind with pinholes in it to simulate a dark starry sky, and you focus each one for a separate exposure, marking the groundglass to control the composition, using Polaroids to make sure the scale of the different sections doesn't look unnatural.
Wow, that sounds like an interesting take. Like a double exposure?
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |