Tark's Australian landscapes

[Tark]

Location: Edith Falls, Northern Territory, AU
Olympus E-3, f/10, 1/640sec/ISO-250/23mm
A popular swimming hole, crocodile free,
guaranteed, trust me ...

Below: My rendition in Oils with wife in the pool ...

 

[koraks]

The scenery is lovely, and I have to say I think in particular the painting is wonderful!

 

[Tark]

The scenery is lovely, and I have to say I think in particular the painting is wonderful!

Thanks, Koraks — that means a lot. Edith Falls is a special place for us, and the painting was my way of holding onto the memory. Glad it resonated with you.

 

[Tark]

Me !

 

[koraks]

That's nice, although I'd wager to say that the dodging or photomontage is a little obvious.

 

[Tark]

Then you would lose your money, korak - it is not a photomontage. The image was shot by my wife.

 

[koraks]

Im referring to the unnatural edges around the body and the inconsistent lighting of the figure in relation to the scene. That's either rather crude digital restoration of shadow detail or photomontage. I'd be happy to assume it's not the latter, but that still leaves the former. Now, there's no accounting for taste, but I find it a little...idk, crude. For me, it doesn't work very well this way, sorry.

 

[benderscameracorner]

Title inspired by the permanence of the subject, Eddystone Point, Tasmania. Exif: Olympus, taken 2002, f/2.8, 1/800, iso100

One of my favourite places, we used to camp here (and the nearby Boulder Point) often growing up.
Photo below was taken by my (press photographer) grandfather of his boat beached for an incoming storm. My mother says it is likely from our 1987 trip but may have been earlier.
(image is a scan of an inkjet print, hence the quality... image originally taken with Nikon F3, possibly a Nikkor or Tamron 35mm, likely Delta 400. Original print Pop would have developed himself).

 

[Tark]

What a great photo Bender; that looks like a very serious tinny your grandfather had, and how serendipitous that the broody cloudscape is somewhat similar to that in mine. Do you know in what year that might have been? My wife and I also set up camp there overnight, Oct., 2003.
Olympus compact, f/2.8, 1/60sec, ISO-100

 

[Tark]

Im referring to the unnatural edges around the body and the inconsistent lighting of the figure in relation to the scene. That's either rather crude digital restoration of shadow detail or photomontage. I'd be happy to assume it's not the latter, but that still leaves the former. Now, there's no accounting for taste, but I find it a little...idk, crude. For me, it doesn't work very well this way, sorry.

Fair enough — digital files can throw up odd artefacts. The original is exactly as shot, though, so whatever you’re seeing is just the camera and the light on the day.