No, but my father was a Kodak Canada employee for decades until retiring in the 1980s.You sure sound like a Kodak employee.
I see no evidence that Fujifilm is struggling with any paper issues at all. Kodak should partner with Fuji and get this problem solved.No, but my father was a Kodak Canada employee for decades until retiring in the 1980s.
And I worked a fair while in the retail and photofinishing and studio areas of the industry when I was young.
I still have a lot of personal connections with people in the industry.
Nothing I have seen indicates anything other than the current players are struggling trying to solve this, and that they care deeply about both doing so and about being able to continue making and selling 120 film in the future.
Just posted recently in the b& w forum is a report from someone who has found a paper problem on negatives from a recent roll of TMAX 400 with the "improved" paper. TMAX 400 is not out of the woods yet.if you have the second edition of "making Kodak film" read the section on Backing paper. it is a fiendishly complicated product, and apparently there is something not happy with the T-max 100 that does not affect the other films that use basically the same PRINTED paper.
I thought it was bold of Kodak to launch a "T-Max Party" on social media with one of their key products MIA. They're now reporting that T-Max 100 in 120 will be available mid-year. Hopefully they mean this year.
Source: https://www.facebook.com/kodakprofessional/posts/1534302116588123
Thanks for mentioning "Making KODAK Film" 2nd edition. Film is a very good detector. It is easy to take backing paper for granted until it degrades your photographs.if you have the second edition of "making Kodak film" read the section on Backing paper. it is a fiendishly complicated product, and apparently there is something not happy with the T-max 100 that does not affect the other films that use basically the same PRINTED paper.
What evidence can you cite for that allegation?They tried to cheap out on paper and R&D, and they lost a lot of sales and customers...
Unless you have evidence, posting such an allegation is what can appropriately described as 'pathetic.'...Pathetic, really.
if you have the second edition of "making Kodak film" read the section on Backing paper. it is a fiendishly complicated product, and apparently there is something not happy with the T-max 100 that does not affect the other films that use basically the same PRINTED paper.
What is? The pathetic nature of posting allegations without evidence?It's so blatantly obvious.
What is? The pathetic nature of posting allegations without evidence?
Not how it works. He/she who makes allegations has the burden of providing evidence they're valid.The evidence is all there. I can point them all to you but you would have to pay me for my time...
Excellent, hold up Foma as an exemplar of quality. The APUG archive is replete with complaints about defective Foma product....if Foma can do it, why can't Kodak?...
Corporations don't owe anybody any information about their internal matters. They also need to trade off the trouble a customer 'costs' versus the benefit of keeping that customer. If you exhibited the same attitude in your communications with Kodak that you do in this thread, I wouldn't be surprised that you were told (to put it politely) to stop bothering them. Nor would I consider such a response unjustified....At this point they lost me and a lot of other customers. I got tired of being insulted.
No formal news? No formal infos? No formal explanations? Just a f**k*ff is all I got, really...
The backing paper is sourced and the film products made by Eastman Kodak. Kodak Alaris is but a marketer/distributor of film....It may also be that Kodak Alaris simply doesn't have enough resources to deal with situations like these as effectively as Eastman Kodak would have in the past...
The backing paper is sourced and the film products made by Eastman Kodak. Kodak Alaris is but a marketer/distributor of film.
The backing paper is sourced and the film products made by Eastman Kodak. Kodak Alaris is but a marketer/distributor of film.
You seem to be missing that there are two different 'Kodaks' involved. The "they" in your post only refers to Eastman Kodak. Kodak Alaris, a completely different company, doesn't assemble film products at any stage.But it is the combination of backing paper and Kodak film that constitutes a problem to us customers. They are responsible for assembly at some stage, and whoever provides the backing paper can have issues with raw materials and supply. Whatever happened, it's not being sorted out very effectively, not is it appearing to be efficient.
You seem to be missing that there are two different 'Kodaks' involved. The "they" in your post only refers to Eastman Kodak. Kodak Alaris, a completely different company, doesn't assemble film products at any stage.
Kodak Alaris is responsible to the distributors, retailers and end-user customers.I am missing nothing. I know about Alaris and Eastman. Alaris is responsible.
The problem appears to be subtle, and My guess is that EK has made up test samples and then aged them in an environmental chamber to see if they have licked the problem before they ship another batch that might not work. This process may take several passes before they figure out where the problem is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?