Mr Bill
Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2006
- Messages
- 1,483
- Format
- Multi Format
Can anyone comment on roughly how much I would save by replenishing versus using the chemicals one-shot?
Sorry, I can't; there are so many variations on the configuration, and my direct experience is out of date. Plus I don't recommend deviating from the Z manual, which says single-use only from a rotary processor.
But going from Z manual specs, etc., if you used a sink line you would use ~25 mL developer replen per roll. With a larger "continuous" processor, this would be ~9 mL per roll. Whereas currently you are using 2500 mL of developer replenisher(?) per 20 rolls (you initially said per week, but last post says per month). Anyway, 2500 mL/20 rolls = 125 mL/roll. So compared to now, at 125 mL LORR dev replenisher per roll, a sink line could be about 25/125 = 1/5 the chemical cost. And the large continuous processor would only be about 9/125 =~ 1/15 of the cost. (You should double-check my numbers; it seems strange that they are so drastically different.)
Back when I was heavily involved, we ran non-LORR developer and an earlier version of the bleach. In 50 ft/min cine processors we HAD to aerate bleach in the processor (spargers on bottom of tank), then we collected and regenerated the bleach overflow. We ran a 3-stage counter-current flow fixer system in order to help meet silver effluent limitations, which were crazy low - something like 2/10 milligram per liter, about 25 times lower than the US drinking water standard. (If you simply took film out of a single fixer bath and into wash water, that water would be way over the limit.) Anyway, the process configurations can have a large effect on overall chemical costs; there's no simple answer.