yorbard
Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2015
- Messages
- 20
- Format
- 35mm RF
Further to my last post, to John Titor, the monetary amounts I quoted, were printed on the post ;by Tapatalk, incorrectly; they should have read, respectively,
For the first-quoted lens, " less than one hundred pounds sterling, and for the latter lens, less than one hundred and fifty pounds sterling. The ridiculous numerical amounts posted by Tapatalk are to be ignored!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
For the first-quoted lens, " less than one hundred pounds sterling, and for the latter lens, less than one hundred and fifty pounds sterling. The ridiculous numerical amounts posted by Tapatalk are to be ignored!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk