Suggest a film?

Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 22
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 2
  • 0
  • 21
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 1
  • 2
  • 35
Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 4
  • 0
  • 40

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,826
Messages
2,781,486
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0

GKC

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
222
Location
Fresno, wher
Format
Large Format
I've been out of 35mm for quite a while and recently thought about unleashing my F2 on the world.
I've no film for it though so I thought about asking here,
For B&W I've always liked Tmax 400 and FP-4+, but for color film there seems to be some new emulsions on the market and the one that's got my interest is Ektar 100.
But I'm open to anything, so any recommendations?
This will be for daylight, landscapes, rusty stuff and old buildings.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Kodak Portra 400
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,466
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Ektar is nice if you like saturated color, depending on your taste it could be very nice for those subjects.
If you like things more subtle then Portra may be the way to go.
I like both, but if I had to choose just one, it would probably be Ektar.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,655
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
For color negative I'm a huge Portra fan. I still print an occasional color negative with an enlarger. Portra is amazing for natural color. Nothing wrong with Ektar. The Professional films from Kodak and Fuji are amazing.
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,245
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
If you like the look of 400 B&W and your reflexes are tuned to an ASA 400 film then you might want to stick with a 400 speed color film - and Portra-400 is rather nice.

The old Ektar-25 was pretty spectacular - the color negative version of Tech Pan and Kodachrome 25 (Those were the days, my friend - we thought they'd never end...). Ektar-100 is good in a so-so way - much like TMax-100 - almost, but not quite there when it comes to pushing the performance envelope.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,421
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
For color, I'd choose Portra 400. For B&W, Ilford Delta 100 developed in Clayton F-76+ is a magical combination IMO.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,294
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
About a hundred recommendations for Portra 400 -- doesn't anyone use Superia Xtra 400? IMO, it's the best 400 speed color print film going. Fuji added a fourth color layer back in the 1990s, which makes the film handle phosphor-based light (like fluorescent or LED) better than common 3-layer color films. It's also cheaper than Portra, and generally available over the counter in non-specialist sources like drug stores, Walmart, Costco (as Kirkland Signature), etc. Same C-41 process, so nothing special need be done in handling.
 

ignatiu5

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
334
Location
Philadelphia, USA
Format
Medium Format
You're likely going to have to try two or three to figure out which works best for your vision, but I would suggest that if possible, choosing a film that is available across all your formats might be helpful moving forward.
I like Portra 400 best for what I shoot (I like the way it does skin tones), but for the subjects you've listed, I certainly would give Ektar a go.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,685
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I think you need to shoot both Porta and Ektar and decide which matches your preferences, and while your at it try Kodak pro Image 100 and Kodak Gold 200.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
You're likely going to have to try two or three to figure out which works best for your vision, but I would suggest that if possible, choosing a film that is available across all your formats might be helpful moving forward.
I like Portra 400 best for what I shoot (I like the way it does skin tones), but for the subjects you've listed, I certainly would give Ektar a go.
Portra is boring for landscapes. Regarding landscape, even Ektar may be too saturated for people. You ought to try a few types and see and use what fits your own needs.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,120
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
For color I suggest, Fuji Superia X-Tra 400
It is a fantastic film and is available in 3-packs at WalMart for a very reasonable price.

(skip the Portra. It is wayy too expensive and really, nothing special)
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
As others have said, you could spend $30-$40 and get a roll of several types of films to see what you like. Along w/ the films people have mentioned, Freestyle has a lot of new films, some of them sounding very interesting.

Here's what they have in color films, and I didn't restrict it to 400 ISO because you might want to experiment. What the heck, you can rate any film for any speed that you want. When I shot color, I would shoot a few frames of each roll at different ISO's just to see. Nearly all the 400 films looked a little better at 200. All of them except the old Agfa Optima films, and boy, do I miss that film!

https://www.freestylephoto.biz/category/3-Film/Color-Negative-Film?attr[]=1-3&attr[]=57-330
 

film_man

Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
1,575
Location
London
Format
Multi Format
If you want to ease into it Portra 400.
If you want cheap Kodak ProImage 100.
If you want something different (...and finnicky) Cinestill 50D.
Plus there's all the other stuff which is great too :D
 

Nitroplait

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Messages
808
Location
Europe (EU)
Format
Multi Format
Economy is probably relevant - at least I think it will be when you research pricing.
The current pricing situation where I live, is that Ektar 100 is more than twice the price of Pro Image 100 - which makes the latter a no-brainer. Fujifilm C200 is preferable over ColorPlus and Gold for a more natural look and the price difference is currently negligible, besides I wouldn't mind paying a little extra for C200.
I am in the lucky situation that I don't really like Portra; it makes everything look "purple" to my eye. Lucky because both Fujifilm Superia X-tra is less than half of Portra 400 and the same can be said for Kodak Ultramax. I prefer Fuji over Kodak in this case as well, but any of the two over Portra.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
I would buy a couple of rolls of the different films, shoot them, and pick the one you like best. That way you will know what they all look like. You may choose one and later on down the line have a project in mind that you think one of the other films might be better for. Some random guys on the internet telling you what film they like best isn't all that helpful.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,421
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
About a hundred recommendations for Portra 400 -- doesn't anyone use Superia Xtra 400?

Yep, like that film a lot, too. Got several boxes of it in the fridge right now. But, for the desert landscape out here in the southwest I just LOVE the color rendering of Portra 400. No doubt that it's expensive, though, and will get more expensive as time marches on.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format


The OP asked about color film. The stuff that came out once color was discovered in the late 1930's.
Calvin & Hobbes black & white.PNG

Calvin&Hobbes B&W.PNG
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2018
Messages
982
Location
USA
Format
Traditional
I'd recommend trying daylight balanced Vision3 if you can cope with the processing requirements and RA-4 prints aren't a high priority. In C-41, I generally get better self-processed negatives from Fuji's consumer films (Superia) than Kodak's (ProImage, Gold, Ultramax) but still shoot both and YMMV. Fuji has essentially left the market of professional CN films, so the choices that remain are the saturation of Ektar or the pastel of Portra.

AFAIK Lomo and Cinestill are the only other entities offering color film at the moment. The new batch of Metropolis seems much improved and might be interesting to compare alongside some other stocks.

Throw in a roll of slide film. Provia seems to have been making it's way back into stores in the US as of late.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,685
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I think OP needs to shoot and print on R4 to see first hand how a film renders color, adjusted in post then scan don't tell the story of what the a print might look like when optically printed. I stopped using the shop nearest me as they now print on inkjet.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The OP asked about color film. The stuff that came out once color was discovered in the late 1930's.

I guess I interpreted "But I'm open to anything, so any recommendations?" more liberally than you did.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom