Fotohuis
Allowing Ads
... and a clear statement that this is NO micro film.
.........and with moderate enlargement, better tonality too.What is the attraction to films like this, Adox CMS 20 etc. when they are only available in 35mm?
I could use fast film in my mamiya 7 handheld and probably get better quality.
What is the attraction to films like this, Adox CMS 20 etc. when they are only available in 35mm?
I could use fast film in my mamiya 7 handheld and probably get better quality.
Here is the preliminary data sheet:
Dead Link Removed
I wish Rollei/Maco would ask someone with good english to proofread their docs prior to publishing them
What is the attraction to films like this, Adox CMS 20 etc. when they are only available in 35mm?
I could use fast film in my mamiya 7 handheld and probably get better quality.
Maybe a job offered for them
I have no further information about this film nor had the possibility to test this film. I only know that German photographers have the possibility to subscribe for their Rollei ATP-V1 test set and do the evaluation.
Ich bin Deutsch auch... kann ich denn eir paar filme testen ??? Bitte ???
Have you actually tried CMS 20 developed in their Adotech developer? I ran a direct comparison between this film and 120 HP-5+ (tripod mounted) souped in DD-X and, believe me, even through a relatively low power loupe (4x) you can easily see that the HP-5 ain't no where near as sharp as CMS 20. Not saying you probably couldn't still get a better enlargement--tonality wise, anyway--with the larger film, but CMS 20 will hold its own up to about 8 - 10x enlargement. Of course, YMMV...
Interesting. I have a panoramic adaptor for my mamiya 7 which allows it to take 35mm film (came with it) - I may finally have found a use for it
24x70mm negs on that film with the mamiya 7's lenses should be good.
Maco advised for the processing of the ATP-V1 their own developer `Rollei RLC (former LP [Laborpartner] Docufine LC)´, a developer intended for low contrast processing of document films.
However a german forum showed that this developer is not a good choice, and Maco is open for other suggestions.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
In 120 please.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?