Success! My first good print.

Sunlit veranda

A
Sunlit veranda

  • 1
  • 0
  • 13
Free!

D
Free!

  • 2
  • 0
  • 14
Near my home.jpg

A
Near my home.jpg

  • 7
  • 2
  • 89
Woodland Shoppers

A
Woodland Shoppers

  • 1
  • 0
  • 59
On The Mound

A
On The Mound

  • 1
  • 3
  • 74

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,466
Messages
2,775,675
Members
99,625
Latest member
weselaar
Recent bookmarks
0

dcy

Member
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
292
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
I'd like to thank everyone for helping me along the way, from learning to develop better negatives to trouble-shooting in the darkroom. I am happy to report what I consider to be my first "good" print:

Setting aside questions of photographic talent, or whether the scene is interesting (I like it), I can at least say that I think this print was performed competently, at least on technical merit. I feel confident that the negative was developed correctly, and I managed to make a print that had no dust marks that I could see, no blemishes from contamination, had the highlights where I wanted them, the shadows where I wanted them, and the midtones where I wanted them.

Here's what I changed from yesterday:
  • Reduced the standard development time to 90 s.
  • Made a fresh batch of developer shortly before I started.
  • Added a pair of tongs to the final wash too in order to minimize contact between fingers and the unfinished print.
  • Diligently (obsessively?) washed and dried my glove-clad hands at the end of each print.
Final thoughts:

The shadows are not impressively dark, but I am using a budget RC paper (MultiTone Pearl) that is known to have a low Dmax. What matters to me is that I think the darkest spots on the image are close to the maximum dark that this paper + developer combo can deliver, and I managed to do that while also giving the highlights (sky and the grass at the bottom-left) the density I wanted, and the midtones (train cart) the density that I wanted.

I actually made many identical copies of the final print. I'm going to save them and use them to experiment with selenium and sepia toning, perhaps in a week or two.

2025-06-30_01-15-59.jpg

2025-06-30_01-16-40.jpg
 

cjbecker

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
1,374
Location
IN
Format
Traditional
It’s a good feeling, when it all comes together.

I have given up on trying to use my hands to develop the paper, it gave me way too many issues. Once I switched to using a set of Paterson tongs, printing was much simpler. One tong for the developer and stop. One for the fix and water bath.
 

Alex Benjamin

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
2,414
Location
Montreal
Format
Multi Format
Looks great. Bravo!

Question: what contrast grade did you use?
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,200
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
It’s a good feeling, when it all comes together.

I have given up on trying to use my hands to develop the paper, it gave me way too many issues. Once I switched to using a set of Paterson tongs, printing was much simpler. One tong for the developer and stop. One for the fix and water bath.

Congratulations on the print success. The same, I have a set of 3 stainless steel tongs from the old Zone VI catalog days....
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Member
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
292
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,226
Format
4x5 Format
Looks great!

Try developing a scrap of fully exposed, and a scrap of undeveloped paper for three minutes. Drop another scrap right in the fix.


Three minutes development runs risk of fog with old paper, but is my standard. Unless I see fog, then I will back down to 90 seconds.

I don’t know what got me to three minutes, I might be making things hard on myself, but I sure get rich blacks.
 

Alex Benjamin

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
2,414
Location
Montreal
Format
Multi Format
Thanks! 😁



On my Durst enlarger the setting was 50m which Ilford says is approx. Grade 3 1/2.

I am using Ilford's handy guide to contrast control to map Ilford grades to settings on the enlarger. Here's the table. My Durst C35 is on the second column.
View attachment 401794

Interesting. Since you seem to have shot this either late morning or early afternoon, I would have expected a lower grade from the photo you posted. Doing a little research, though, I did read that this MultiTone Pearl paper is pretty low contrast, which might explain what I saw.

This will be an interesting negative for experimenting different papers, and different contrast grades. There's a lot of tonal variety.

One last question: do you remember which colours were the stop sign and the train wagon behind it?
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,534
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
These look great. To increase your D max on neutral/cold tone papers try using Se toner, for Ilford neutral tone papers I usually start with 1+3 (25% solution) of Kodak Rapid Selenium toner. (Warm tone papers I use 1+9)

With neutral or cold tone papers you will see a fairly quick (60-90 seconds) subtle increase in density without a lot of tone change (at least with Ilford MG IV) fiber base papers tone change is more variable, thankfully the latest RC paper from Ilford seems amazing from what i've seen so no need to rush into FB.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,534
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Also consider using the two filter (yellow and magenta) filtration Ilford lists for much, much less changes to exposure times between different contrast grades. Super easy when using dichroic filter heads.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom