• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Subbing for TX in Diafine

Do Not Come Here

A
Do Not Come Here

  • 9
  • 3
  • 84
Heavy

H
Heavy

  • 13
  • 5
  • 129

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,929
Messages
2,832,173
Members
101,019
Latest member
ferbert72
Recent bookmarks
0

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,421
Location
glens falls, ny USA
Format
Multi Format
With a 100' roll of TX reaching $100, I won't be buying it anytime soon. What would be your favorite substitute for TX in Diafine? HP-5, Kentmere 400, or Foma (Arista EDU)? I used to get a good EI of 1000 with TX; probably won't reach that with other films, but should get close.
 

BetterSense

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,151
Location
North Caroli
Format
35mm
Tri-X and Diafine are synergistic. I have partially switched to HP5, but that's with Rodinal. I would be interested to hear how HP5 does in Diafine compared to Tri-X in Diafine.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,520
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
I feel like HP5 in Diafine behaves very differently from TX. It doesn't develop the characteristic "gritty" grain structure or the aggressively-high-contrast look; instead it seems to produce a long, smooth compressed shoulder, and generally a more "natural" appearance. I used to use HP5 at 800 a lot for nighttime street photography---it seems to match how the eye perceives bright lights in a dark setting.

I've never seen anything look quite like TX in Diafine. Fomapan 400 seems like a reasonable place to start looking, though I'd be surprised if it yielded EI 1000 in practice.

-NT
 

jeztastic

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
102
Format
Medium Format
HP5 has great shadow detail in Microphen at 800 and acceptable at 1600 so I imagine regularly shooting at 1000 will be fine. Don't know anything about diafine. Do a search on flickr, that's what I do before I try a new combination.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Since I gave up bulk loading as too much PITA for the savings even at the old prices I don't much care - I'll keep using Tri-X when the combo suits.

I did try HP5, may have been without the plus, in it years ago. I don't recall details except that it worked well but got a stop less effective speed. Box (the Diafine box, not the film) speed for Tri-X was 1600 and for HP5 IIRC 800 and those were pretty good. Of course modern Tri-X seems to give me less, at least with tungsten light. I can use 1600 fine with daylight, say a heavy overcast day, but under tungsten I need more like EI 1000 so the difference now may be effectively less if HP5+ still responds like it did then. Or perhaps I'm just much pickier now.
 

Xmas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
Double-x is another option especially if you can get recan or short end.
Formapan 400 does not have the dynamic range of Hp5+ or Double-x but it does have nice grain
 

pschauss

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 29, 2002
Messages
244
I shoot Double-X at 650 with Diafine. After Plus-X in Rodinal it's my second favorite film/developer combination. :-(

I have tried Diafine with Fomapan 400, but the best I could get out of it was box speed.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom