• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Street Photography unethical?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,608
Messages
2,857,009
Members
101,923
Latest member
DarrinPod
Recent bookmarks
0
Status
Not open for further replies.
You write nothing but incoherent nonsense.

What part of "99.9% of the people I photograph are unaware of me doing so", are you confused by?

What part of, "if someone is disturbed by my photographing, I stop and move on", is beyond your ability to understand?

Only a paranoid and severely delusional mind can add the above together and come up with that I am disrespectful.

My 35,000+ street photography library demonstrates very clearly how utterly wrong your nonsensical ramblings are. I enjoyed building that library and I would not have done so if I were disturbing people all that time. I would have found a more relaxing hobby if even a modicum of your lunacy were true.

This is your typical drivel. Your modus operandi never wavers.
 
You two have incredible stamina!

Not really. Ratty will certainly outlast me because I tire of conversation lacking in truthful banter and consistency. I'll call it quits long before Ratty ends his rampage and self-contradictory commentary. But Ratty's rage never ends.:wink:
 
I gave you clear statements to disprove. You can't and so it's over.

LOL yeah... you're typical cop-out BS. You can't defend your own actions so you cut/paste the same responses over and over and over and over and... :wink:
 
I repeat, Ratty, posts #89 and #96 and #112. Please defend them.
 
LOL yeah... you're typical cop-out BS. You can't defend your own actions so you cut/paste the same responses over and over and over and over and... :wink:
I have already defended my actions. You haven't put forward a single logical reason against them. Not. A. Single. One.

Just ranting and raving, foaming at the mouth, incoherent drivel supposing rights that no court of law in the US will EVER uphold.

You are 100% FACTUALLY wrong. In every sense of the word, you are wrong.
 
I have already defended my actions. You haven't put forward a single logical reason against them. Not. A. Single. One.

Just ranting and raving, foaming at the mouth, incoherent drivel supposing rights that no court of law in the US will EVER uphold.

You are 100% FACTUALLY wrong. In every sense of the word, you are wrong.

I'm not ranting, Ratty. You are. Again, defend your posts #89 and #96 and #112.
 
It's not "horse power". It's horsepower. And it's not your "thesis". It's your presumption and/or your proposal.
 
Tell it to my iPhone.

Learn to write so you don't need to rely on a device to assist you in written correspondence. Gee whiz, man, I wuz brunged up in south Texas skools. Sherly yoo kin doo bettern mee.
 
It's not "horse power". It's horsepower. And it's not your "thesis". It's your presumption and/or your proposal.
Give him a break. He's typing on an iPhone. That's a feat in itself worth marveling. Me too... But mine puts more errors in than it actually corrects. Nighty night Mike. Tuck yourself in and sleep it off. Ha ha ha.
 
Give him a break. He's typing on an iPhone. That's a feat in itself worth marveling. Me too... But mine puts more errors in than it actually corrects. Nighty night Mike.

LOL... thanks, Brian. I am questioning reason and logic but, more importantly, consistency in one's propositions. That is questioning one's truthfulness and sincerity. If a person cannot be consistent with his/her statements nor avoid immature name-calling in feeble attempts to defend one's position, their reasoning capability is in question as is their intelligence and maturity. I don't care about typographical errors and misspellings. :wink:
 
You may want to re-read this thread in the morning. RattyMouse is more right than wrong. But more than anything, this kind of animosity is completely uncalled for.
 
You may want to re-read this thread in the morning. RattyMouse is more right than wrong. But more than anything, this kind of animosity is completely uncalled for.

I don't think I'm expressing any more animus than Ratty. I understand that Ratty is 'legally' right and that he claims to respect others' rights to be left alone but I'm looking at posts #89, #96 and #112 in which he seems to openly disregard others' needs to be left alone. Given Ratty's animus toward others and inconsistency of opinion in this and other threads, I'm asking him to defend those particular posts in this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom