Sort of.
This is what he said to me when I inquired after it. The argument boils down to (1) getting rid of the developer, and (2) "my colleagues knew what they were doing so let's assume there is a reason". The extraction argument I believe should be seen in the context of high-volume machine processing, where the dwell time of the film in the stop bath is brief. In a home setup, you can easily extend the stop bath time and follow it with one or two rinses if so desired. I suspect that this ultimately achieves the same stability.
Btw, I also suspect that his wording was somewhat informal and not entirely accurate. CD remaining in the emulsion would oxidize at a later stage and thus pose a threat primarily to the unreacted dye couplers, not so much the already formed image-wise dyes.
Also, please don't take this the wrong way, but as in many, many cases, we end up in a situation where someone offers that "Photo Engineer said X or Y". This always ends up in a bout of "hermeneutics of the gospel of Mowrey" (which I'm certainly co-responsible for) and it only gets us so far. We should be cautious to not read more into his words than their literal meaning. And we should also keep in mind that his knowledge was sometimes (dare I say it...) limited - and he never argued otherwise! For instance, also on the topic of stop bath, I asked about citric acid for color processes and this is what he said:
Sometimes, Ron was just like the rest of us. He passed on what he remembered, informally so, and while is knowledge was encyclopedic, it was not absolute, infinite or infallible.
It's really the same, just without the dye. 1+3 would be roughly equivalent to the Kodak dilution you used before.I also have 5% vinegar on hand, would it be better to use that?
I never tried an indicator stop bath and I'd be somewhat hesitant to mix a colored dye into a color negative processing sequence - even though the indicator dye will likely was out just fine. 1+60 boils down to something like 1.5% acetic acid. Should be OK as long as you use it one shot.
It's really the same, just without the dye. 1+3 would be roughly equivalent to the Kodak dilution you used before.
Maybe your green streaks have a different origin. Can you describe your processing sequence in detail and post some examples, please?
I never tried an indicator stop bath and I'd be somewhat hesitant to mix a colored dye into a color negative processing sequence - even though the indicator dye will likely was out just fine. 1+60 boils down to something like 1.5% acetic acid. Should be OK as long as you use it one shot.
It's really the same, just without the dye. 1+3 would be roughly equivalent to the Kodak dilution you used before.
Maybe your green streaks have a different origin. Can you describe your processing sequence in detail and post some examples, please?
This roll of ECN-2 was expired and pretty rough
My guess is that there is no pre-bath, but that you start directly with the developer, which may have had a higher temperature. The drop in temperature during pouring is a fact, but the first streams that hit the film have not yet cooled. When the film is dry, those first few seconds can have a greater impact than many people realize.
Try fresh film, see how it goes. Although the damage I see so far is not typical for regular age-related fog. It may be simply fogging due to light leaks somewhere in the process. Heck, could be anything at this point; dig up the negatives and have a closer look at those. Scans generally don't tell a very complete story.I mean to say that it was expired and pretty fogged from age.
I wish it was that easyi do the prebath and then a 3min bath in 106F water to get up to temp before the dev goes straight in.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?