Storing Hasselblad Film Backs... without dark slide.. Fact, Fiction, or Urban Legend?

Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 21
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 5
  • 154
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 161
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 2
  • 2
  • 153

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,814
Messages
2,781,199
Members
99,710
Latest member
LibbyPScott
Recent bookmarks
0

Ira Rush

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
177
Location
Proud to be
Format
Medium Format
Hello,

I am almost positive I read somewhere that it is actually recommended that one should not store film back magazines with the dark slide inserted, (obviously unloaded, empty ones) to avoid prolonged compression of the foam pad. This is to lessen the chance that the seal will compress and stop performing its function (keeping a good light tight seal).

I know I saw this somewhere... I can not find this in Wildi or in Freytag...

Fact or fiction?

Thanks in advance
 

Thomas Wilson

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2008
Messages
230
Location
Baltimore, M
Format
Medium Format
I think there is probably a bit of truth in that. It can't hurt, unless you happen to bend or lose the slide in the process. All of my magazines have the Lindal type back with the slide holder slot in them.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,466
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
I dunno, sounds like urban legend. The seal isn't just foam, its primary component is a springy metal or perhaps plastic strip similar to a weather strip. I'm not sure the foam is compressed all that much with the darkslide in place.
There would be a lot of potential for getting dirt or debris in the magazine, or damaging the exposed pressure plate. I think I take the risk of leaving the slide in place.
 

Barry S

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
1,350
Location
DC Metro
Format
Large Format
Honestly, I wouldn't worry about it. I've replaced Hassy light traps and it's cheap and takes 10 minutes if you're slow. The traps also last a long time so unless you're concerned about the traps lasting for 15 years instead of 10, why not keep where they're supposed to be?
 

André E.C.

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
1,518
Location
Finland
Format
Medium Format
Certainly a mix of myth, some truth and outrageous lies, like let's say, religion?:smile::tongue:

Hasselholicism exists.:tongue:

Cheers


André
 

hka

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
397
Format
Multi Format
What about dust that's comes into the filmback when not using the slides?
I change every 5 years the lightseals just to prevent but mostly the stil look fine.
 

PanaDP

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
78
Format
8x10 Format
Changing the light traps is worth the spotting time saved by not having your backs get all dusty inside.
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
It definitely is fact.
Not myth. Nor lies, outrageous or other.

The foam will not take kindly to being compressed all the time. It will deteriorate anyway, but the compression helps.

The "primary component" of the seal is indeed the foam. It is the thing that squeezes along the dark slide, up, to form a light tight seal when the slide is inserted, and extends up along the entire width of the dark slide slot when the slide is out.
The bendy bit of metal-looking plastic foil beneath the foam is merely there so they can skimp on the thickness of the foam: it pushes the foam bit up.

Light traps (the foam bits) will not last 15 years. They will not last 10 years.
To be on the safe side, changing seals at least every two years is advisable.
You could hold out longer, untill you start losing images because of light leaks. But is it worth it?
 
OP
OP

Ira Rush

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
177
Location
Proud to be
Format
Medium Format
Thanks Q.C., was beginning to think I was going crazy....

It definitely is fact.
Not myth. Nor lies, outrageous or other.

Thanks Q.C., was beginning to think I was going crazy....:wink:

I know I read it somewhere... where is the printed source, is it in Wildi or Freytag, searched the book(s) could not find it...

Other posters have a point about dust and dirt, but if it is stored safely that should not be a problem...

now where oh where did I see it????

Thanks in advance
 

lomomagix

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
43
Format
Medium Format
It definitely is fact.
Not myth. Nor lies, outrageous or other.

The foam will not take kindly to being compressed all the time. It will deteriorate anyway, but the compression helps.

Very interesting!

Just to be a little off-topic: is the same true for all the MF SLRs (Mamiya, Bronica, Rollei, etc.)?
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Ira,

I don't know if (and if so, where) it is in a book.
That is: it probably is - almost everything you can imagine can be found in a book somewhere - but i don't know if it is in one of the well known books on Hasselblad.

Dust and dirt is not a problem.
If you store the back on camera, the camera will protect against dust as well as the slide.
If not on camera, the magazine will of course be empty. Pop the insert out large brush, a quick blow, and it's clean. Very easy, and quick.


I do not know the details of how all other cameras seal their dark slide slots and backs (and mirror boxes and ...). But this thing about foam is, of course, true for all things that use (similar) foam.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom