removed account4
Subscriber
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,833
- Format
- Hybrid
But we all know that’s where companies often spend the least amount of money.
kodak has never been known to shirk their responsibility of quality assurance, but exactly the opposite !
LOL aren't we all ?!Lol but what do I know, after 30 years of darkroom experience I’m still ignorant and inept.
ive got close to 40 years darkroom experience and admittedly i am ignorant in inept when it comes
to photography the more i think i know the less i realize i know,
... having been in online foto fora for a long time its usual the photographers who exhibit hubris that have no clue ..
As Matt King stated above, the backing paper left artifacts on the film and led to very strange effects during development - not just frame numbers. Some can be corrected in Photoshop, but when you have mottling on the entire frame it becomes a real chore. Just forget about printing the negatives in the darkroom.
i had fuji film years back that gave the # on the film
and the only gripes i read about was the letters/words &c not streaks &c
sounds like my kind of film to be honest! i tried to get people
to sell me their damaged goods so i could use it but no one took me
up on my offer .. much fun to use instant collage film, surprised lomo hasn't bought it all
i think they are selling pre-exposed film to double expose with

Last edited: