• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Sprint Chemistry: reasons not to use it

OP
OP

StoneNYC

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format

I noticed that, the label change must be new as they had both the old and new labels in the school darkroom.
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,783
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format

If they drip when closed, then I assume they allow at least some air in when the box is on it's back.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid

exactly ... they make good-stuff, not materials specifically made to mask insufficiencies of poor student and otherwise incompetent photographers .
i hate to say this but i think the teacher who claims how bad it is probably is like all the folks who refused buy a speed graphic, or a graflex view camera
because of "entry model-itis " . sprint chemistry is used in schools, so it must be a terrible, entry level system.
both statements couldn't be as far from the truth as could be. speed graphics+graphic view cameras have been used by professionals for more than half a century
and the sprint system can hold its own against pretty much anything out there.

ymmv
 

37th Exposure

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Messages
208
Location
The Land of
Format
35mm
When I was in high school ages ago, the darkroom was stocked with Kodak, Ilford, and Agfa chemicals. Paper was Kodak FB single weight. Students without their own camera could borrow a Nikon FM2 and Nikkor lens. Film was Kodak Tri-X then later Tmax 400.
For best results avoid these brands