• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Sprint Chemistry: reasons not to use it


I noticed that, the label change must be new as they had both the old and new labels in the school darkroom.
 

If they drip when closed, then I assume they allow at least some air in when the box is on it's back.
 

exactly ... they make good-stuff, not materials specifically made to mask insufficiencies of poor student and otherwise incompetent photographers .
i hate to say this but i think the teacher who claims how bad it is probably is like all the folks who refused buy a speed graphic, or a graflex view camera
because of "entry model-itis " . sprint chemistry is used in schools, so it must be a terrible, entry level system.
both statements couldn't be as far from the truth as could be. speed graphics+graphic view cameras have been used by professionals for more than half a century
and the sprint system can hold its own against pretty much anything out there.

ymmv
 
When I was in high school ages ago, the darkroom was stocked with Kodak, Ilford, and Agfa chemicals. Paper was Kodak FB single weight. Students without their own camera could borrow a Nikon FM2 and Nikkor lens. Film was Kodak Tri-X then later Tmax 400.
For best results avoid these brands