• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

spoon measurement

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,903
Messages
2,831,924
Members
101,014
Latest member
photomaximo
Recent bookmarks
0

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
David, it my tests of using spoon (volume) vs weight, I have found as much as a 20% error in any given instance. In addition, I was looking through silverware information and found that spoon design can introduce quite a bit more error as there is no standard spoon it seems unless you get the generic variety from your local supplier.

PE
 

nworth

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
David, it my tests of using spoon (volume) vs weight, I have found as much as a 20% error in any given instance. In addition, I was looking through silverware information and found that spoon design can introduce quite a bit more error as there is no standard spoon it seems unless you get the generic variety from your local supplier.

PE

Very true. I assume the measurements given are for the standard kitchen measurement spoons. But there will still be significant variation because the chemicals do not always pack the same way and because you do not always fill the spoon the same way. For putting sulfite into fixer, I can use a teaspoon - the amount isn't that critical. But for developers, where I care about what the result will be, careful weighing is essential. Weston used teaspoon measures sometimes for his amidol print developers. If you look at his prints from that period, they are not all that consistent (beautiful, but not that consistent). But then, he was also developing by inspection using old materials (which were not that consistent, either). Today - weigh.
 
OP
OP
David Lyga

David Lyga

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,445
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
David, it my tests of using spoon (volume) vs weight, I have found as much as a 20% error in any given instance. In addition, I was looking through silverware information and found that spoon design can introduce quite a bit more error as there is no standard spoon it seems unless you get the generic variety from your local supplier.

PE

First, Ron, I do not use the 'sloppy' spoon method. I use small, graduated cylinders which are precise in calibration. And, best to say this now: you have to tap the powder down: not like crazy, but a few times with moderation, in order to gain any consistency and to make a level top for the powder.

Theoretically, PE, you are correct and we all admit that. But my method does give more than acceptable results if you do it the way I state. I really doubt, if you do it my way. that you will get a 20% error or even close to that. I have been doing this for years. Spoons introduce unnecessary error and confusion (heaping or level?). Again, the ONLY reason I started this thread with 'spoons' is to reflect and sustain a collective familiarity. - David Lyga
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
David Lyga

David Lyga

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,445
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
Does this help?

Of course this helps. It is what I had originally asked for. Thank you RPC.

But, alas, RPC, we are unable to scroll past 'S'. You have submitted a 'picture', not an Excel worksheet. - David Lyga
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Wayne

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
3,622
Location
USA
Format
Large Format
Of course this helps. It is what I had originally asked for. Thank you RPC.

But, alas, RPC, we are unable to scroll past 'S'. You have submitted a 'picture', not an Excel worksheet. - David Lyga


I just sent you the one from Anchell, though there is only one "T" chemical in it. :laugh:
 

ME Super

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 17, 2011
Messages
1,479
Location
Central Illinois, USA
Format
Multi Format
Spoons introduce unnecessary error and confusion (heaping or level?).

When cooking, this is my standard rule: All spoons are level unless the recipe dictates otherwise. So if a recipe states 1 teaspoon baking soda, I use one level teaspoon of it. This seems pretty reasonable for photography too, if one insists on using spoons instead of weighing the chemicals.

In high school and college chemistry class, we weighed everything unless it was a liquid, in which case it got measured in a graduated cylinder or beaker.
 

RPC

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
1,633
Format
Multi Format
But, alas, RPC, we are unable to scroll past 'S'. You have submitted a 'picture', not an Excel worksheet. - David Lyga

What you see, is all there is in the chart I got from somewhere, but don't remember where. If there was ever more to it, sorry, I don't have it. I've never used it; I weigh everything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
David;

I have gotten NaBr from two sources that varies in crystal habit. One is a fine powder and the other is coarse cubes. There is a HUGE difference in weight when one weighs an exact teaspoon of each. For one thing, it is hard to get a "level" teaspoon of large cubes, but easy to do this with a powder.

This leads us to grinding and cleaning up the residue.

PE
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom