StoneNYC
Allowing Ads
It's got to be the former; I can't even imagine the minimums Kodak would require to do the latter.
Duncan
Eastman 5222 (Double-X) film does not have to be developed in a special developer D-96. Motion picture film is typically developed to a lower Contrast Index or Gamma than still films hence the use of a softer developer. The reason for this is because prints are made on positive stock which is fairly contrasty. For still use you can use any film developer you wish.
I prefer to rate 5222 at an EI of 400 outdoors to get a bit more contrast and have used Rodinal 1+49 @ 21C and HC-110 1+49 8.5 m @21C. Because this film is on a thicker base it dries flat and tends not to curl.
Kodak lists an RMS Granularity of 14 (very file) which makes it finer grained than Tri-X RMS Granularity 17 (fine).
Thanks, perhaps it prints better than it scans, (being finer grain than I've experienced) which would make sense since it's an older emulsion formula to my knowledge.
Anyway can not wait to shoot it!!
In the past Kodak has routinely made unannounced changes in its products. So even though 5222 has been around for a long time (1959) the emulsion has probably changed quite a bit over the years.
From a variety of posts concerning scans many say that unless one is carful and has a good scanner grain can be unduly emphasized. T
Mine will be printed optically (probably scanned for posting on line as well, though). Can't wait to get this stuff!
Wish i could afford more than one box. My wife and middle daughter have to have surgery in the next two weeks so there's not much extra cash kicking around. On top of that, Christmas is around the corner and my oldest daughter is getting married in the Spring. Yeah, I'm pretty much broke right now : ).
I wanted to send an update on the progress of the co-p for Double X 4x5. Currently I have 79 people committed to 188 boxes. I have been in contact with Kodak alaris about the film. The manufacturing division of Eastman Kodak is currently doing a feasibility study for the film. They need to see if the machinery that cuts sheet film is able to work with the Double X film. This is due to the fact that cinematography is not on the same substrate as sheet film. I think this is great. My past experience with special order Kodak films has been that if it is possible, they will do it for me. With the holiday season it could take some extra time before I find out if this manufacturing procedure is possible. Please be patient as we wait. I also want to thank you for your participation in the endeavor. I will send you new information as I receive it.
Threads merged.
Good luck to those who are in, a great film in 35mm that I shoot lots of. Surprised that there wasn't more vitriol about this!
I use 400 ISO Rodinal 1:100 19C stand better grain than 3x by some margin in 5222 reels bit of a waste in 5x4 but without +x...
looks to be a stop slower than 3x shooting cassettes back to back
It's toe and shoulder is nice
I've only got 1000 foot left.
hope your boat comes home
Let me try: I think he shoots Double-X at EI 400. When developed in Rodinal at 1:100 he finds the grain to be finer than what he gets with Tri-X (3x) but it doesn't matter much in 4x5 :crazy:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?