Sow's Ear

Finders Kiptar

D
Finders Kiptar

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Dry Rack.jpg

A
Dry Rack.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 20
Merriam Crater

A
Merriam Crater

  • 3
  • 0
  • 22
Merriam Crater

A
Merriam Crater

  • 3
  • 0
  • 22

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,486
Messages
2,775,884
Members
99,628
Latest member
DanielCTracht
Recent bookmarks
0

jjstafford

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
731
Location
Minnesota Tr
Format
Multi Format
Vegans might want to skip out now.

The saying is "You can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear", but I'll place a gentleman's bet that Kodak makes it's gelatin from exactly that. Takers?
 

c6h6o3

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2002
Messages
3,215
Format
Large Format
jjstafford said:
Vegans might want to skip out now.

The saying is "You can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear", but I'll place a gentleman's bet that Kodak makes it's gelatin from exactly that. Takers?

At least during my lifetime, Eastman Kodak has been (and I believe still is) the world's largest purchaser of cow bones. They use them to make gelatin.

As to porcine bones, I have no idea. What's your point?
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Can you make a silk purse out of a Wratten #51 filter?
 

bobfowler

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
1,441
Location
New Jersey,
Format
Multi Format
David A. Goldfarb said:
Can you make a silk purse out of a Wratten #51 filter?

No, you need a #47 and a #58.
 

Gay Larson

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
1,209
Location
Oklahoma
Format
Medium Format
If it bothers you, don't eat any jello
 

bobfowler

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
1,441
Location
New Jersey,
Format
Multi Format
Gay Larson said:
If it bothers you, don't eat any jello

"There's always room for Jello" :smile:

hehehe
 

Bighead

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
471
Format
Medium Format
No wonder I get hate mail from PETA once or twice a year.... They've seen how much film I go through.....
 

Claire Senft

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
3,239
Location
Milwaukee, W
Format
35mm
Absolutely. However, I want to eat it in person. One cone for me...one cone for you. I will tell you when.
 

c6h6o3

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2002
Messages
3,215
Format
Large Format
The unannounced change in grade 2 Azo a few years back (longer development times, less contrast) was due to the change in the gelatin formula forced upon Kodak by the change in the quality of the cow bones. Hideous though it is to think about, it's essential to the process of making both film and paper.
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
In two words, beef bones is correct. Pork is also used.
I found a wealth of gelatin information via the WWW.
Seems it also goes very well with ink jet papers. Dan
 

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,413
Format
Multi Format
Bighead said:
No wonder I get hate mail from PETA once or twice a year.... They've seen how much film I go through.....


I'll bet a lot of those folks eat Jello and don't realize where it comes from.
 

fparnold

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
264
Location
Binghamton,
Format
Multi Format
Maybe, but seeing the number of questionable alternatives being pushed, I think they're becoming aware.

More seriously, If they could use nitrocellulose in the old days, isn't there a modern synthetic polymer that could be used instead? Is this a matter of inertia, i.e. they figure they'll be out of film before they'd recoup the costs of reengineering their emulsions to use the alternative, or that the organic functionalities in gelatin are currently too hard to reproduce on that scale for consistent quality?
 
OP
OP

jjstafford

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
731
Location
Minnesota Tr
Format
Multi Format
Claire Senft said:
Absolutely. However, I want to eat it in person. One cone for me...one cone for you. I will tell you when.
It's a deal! Just as soon as I get the car running again. It's been stored for thee years. :smile:
 

fschifano

Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
fparnold said:
More seriously, If they could use nitrocellulose in the old days, isn't there a modern synthetic polymer that could be used instead? Is this a matter of inertia, i.e. they figure they'll be out of film before they'd recoup the costs of reengineering their emulsions to use the alternative, or that the organic functionalities in gelatin are currently too hard to reproduce on that scale for consistent quality?

Nitrocellulose was used for the support in the old days. The gelatin silver suspension (it's not really an emulsion even though we call it that) was coated onto that. Today we use different and more stable plastics for the support, but the gelatin silver light sensitive layer is still with us.
 

magic823

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Messages
456
Location
Boise, ID
Format
Multi Format
Actually gelatine is a pretty amazing protein. There really isn't anything like it for photography. There is a whole chapter about it in Haist's "Modern Photographic Processing".
 

fparnold

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
264
Location
Binghamton,
Format
Multi Format
Ach! Thanks for the correction (never post too late in the day). I had the emulsion and the base confused. I'll have to go read that chapter.

The question, however, does remain; isn't there something other than gelatin that could be made consistently? I suppose with the current fear of cholesterol, having EK corner the world market on Egg White isn't going to be a real option.
 
OP
OP

jjstafford

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
731
Location
Minnesota Tr
Format
Multi Format
fparnold said:
Ach! Thanks for the correction (never post too late in the day). I had the emulsion and the base confused. I'll have to go read that chapter.

The question, however, does remain; isn't there something other than gelatin that could be made consistently? I suppose with the current fear of cholesterol, having EK corner the world market on Egg White isn't going to be a real option.
Is it not a moot point? Kodak is going out of business, and so demand in the USA for the particular gelatin will plummet, the suppliers will probably go under as another obsolete industry.
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
jjstafford said:
Is it not a moot point? Kodak is going out of business,
and so demand in the USA for the particular gelatin will
plummet, the suppliers will probably go under as
another obsolete industry.

I'm sure the market for gelatin will increase. It is a sizing
ingredient. Firms are competing for the sized ink jet paper
market. Perhaps Kodak's gelatin facility will thrive. Dan
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,270
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
And don't forget that the vast bulk of gelatin production is still for food -- it's not just used in gelatin desserts, there's gelatin in lots of candies and other food products.

Gelatin was readily available (as hide glue) when gelatin emulsions were invented. It'll be available (as fingernail strenghtening supplements and desserts, if nothing else) when we have to make our own glass plates.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
I've made my own aspic from scratch and I sometimes make my own beef and chicken stock, so gelatin isn't that hard to come by. I figure anything they could make in the nineteenth century shouldn't be impossible to make in my kitchen.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom