- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,833
- Format
- Hybrid
When I made my photographs I didn't have the intention to please anyone, showing them to anyone, so?sorry to be blunt
its been said over and over and over again
but pretty much 99% of photography is dead
and pretty much everyone who makes photographs,
unless they are some gallery or museum's darling
or have deep pockets or deep connections stuff
is wasting their time and effort because no one really cares ...
and if someone really cares will they do more than pat you on the back?
put up the $$ some people might say, and not just a few bucks, $$ for the time
and effort i put into making the photograph... (meh ! )
does that matter?
what do you do, just stop? or keep doing your thing even though
its gonna be in the dumpster ...
i keep doing it, its one of those things .. i figure ill do for as long as i can ...
but pretty much 99% of photography is dead
and pretty much everyone who makes photographs,
unless they are some gallery or museum's darling
or have deep pockets or deep connections stuff
is wasting their time and effort because no one really cares ...
What do you mean by that? I don't have any printing service. Whenever I shoot film I print them myself.I take it you just got your monthly statement from your printing service and it was disappointing?
" koduck sux, fugi sux" better ?I dont care at all about your post or poll. Sorry to be blunt.
right on !!I like it (wife does too) and that's all that matters! Oh, and its a social thing when regional people get together...coffee, food, shoot, talk, etc. Oh, speaking of that John, lets all meet up again at Olga's cafe sometime!
hssss nah no fairy dust im not against pixelmagic !Huh??
John, snap out of it!
What did you sprinkle on your cereal this morning? Some Wim Wenders fairy dust??
noooo im not a hater of modern / contemporaty photography just a realist ..Probably the same complaint was made by photographic people 100 years ago "99% of photography is dead" when photography was about 50 years old, (Steichen and Stieglitz perhaps?). Now it is 150 years old and still going strong.
Perhaps the OP statement reflects a dislike for much of current photography? Like and dislike are individual and everyone is entitled to their opinion. However I contest the claim that photography is dead, the quantity of photographs has increased, the quality varies a lot, much dross, some beauty, perhaps a little inspiration here and there? It was always that way. But dead? No.
Ya ya it's all about the 1%. The 1% has it all, the rest of us are slugs
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?