Something's precipitating out of my Kodak Rapid Fix

Mr Bill

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
1,452
Format
Multi Format
You could compare the clearing time of this salvaged fixer to fresh/good fixer using a strip of film (paper of course doesn't work as you can't really see it clear)...

Actually there is a way to sorta observe, crudely, the "clearing time" for paper. Like so: get a smallish strip of fresh photo paper, several inches long. Put several reference marks along the long side. Holding one end immerse it into some fixer to the first mark for say, 5 seconds. Then immerse to the next mark for another 5 seconds. Repeat another couple of times, then quickly immerse in water to rinse the fixer off. What you now have are sections fixed for, say, 5+5+5+5 = 20 seconds, then 5+5+5 = 15 seconds, then 10 seconds, then 5 seconds, etc.

After a good rinse put the entire strip into some developer... long enough to get fairly dark. The paper will remain white wherever the fixer completely removed the silver halide (roughly equivalent to "clearing" film). So the first completely white step gives an approximate time for complete fixing/clearing.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,607
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Yes, that's a good way, @Mr Bill! I hadn't thought of that, but it's a great way to actually test this with the paper that'll be used. It's better than to approximate it through film the way I suggested.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,319
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

This is worth its own Resource thread. In the meantime, I'll add a link to the post on my Resource regarding clearing time testing with film, found here: https://www.photrio.com/forum/resou...fixing-procedure-for-black-white-negatives.75
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,577
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
I've done this before, and then used the 2x rule that applies to film. I'm curious now if that doubling is necessary or not for a safety factor. Any thoughts?

Best,

Doremus
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,607
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I've done this before, and then used the 2x rule that applies to film. I'm curious now if that doubling is necessary or not for a safety factor. Any thoughts?

I think the doubling is an arbitrary safety factor, but that the safety factor as such is wise to include. After all, especially when fixing paper, only the first sheet sees fresh fixer. After this, the fixer is used and it'll slow down to some extent as it's used. How big that extent is, is anyone's guess and you might conduct an additional experiment on it, but I think the pragmatic solution is just to take a safety factor and apply that.
 

john_s

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,132
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
I might try that, just for fun. Yield will likely be pretty horrible, but it'll be a fun experiment to see if it can be used to yield a working fixer.

And that's how sodiumselenosulfite can be made, the active ingredient of selenium toner, because selenium reacts like sulfur (same column in the periodic table). Elemental selenium is boiled in sulfite solution. Internet reports of yield vary widely. And you don't do it indoors.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,611
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

it's sulfur and almost imossible to get back into solution but if you filter it through something like a coffee filter it's perfectly usable.
 
OP
OP

Trey

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
91
Location
NYC
Format
35mm

That's a good point and something I thought of after posting, which led me to disposing of the remainder of the open bottle. I'll maybe use the unopened 5gal bottle to get through this weekend and I do have fresh stuff on the way.

It actually is about $400.00AUD worth of fixer to replace, even though I paid way less than that.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,607
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
It actually is about $400.00AUD worth of fixer to replace, even though I paid way less than that.

OK, that's a significant amount, but I'd focus on the actual purchase value more so than a hypothetical retail value. Anyway, now we're in accounting territory, which I've always experienced as similarly flexible to a gymnast at the height of her physical prowess.

Anyway, you might be able to salvage the other bottles that haven't gone as far downhill as this one - and the bottles that aren't affected at all (assuming some of them aren't) would of course be fine to use anyway.

And that's how sodiumselenosulfite can be made
I've been tempted to do that in the past, but I guess I ain't quite dumb enough to go there, LOL!
 

khh

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2020
Messages
73
Location
Oslo, Norway
Format
Multi Format
Oh, is that what that is? I've had used fixer deposit a silvery layer on the walls of clear glass bottles that made them look like mirrors.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…