Most stuff displayed on folding banquet tables at front yard estate sales usually is.
Ken
Yeah, but the ink will be cheap.
I checked the lin?s you supplied: apparenty fewer than 80 boxes of TMAX 400 in 8x10" size were preordered in that time frame. The total amount people were willing to pay for this was about 6000$. Sorry, but I can't blame Kodak or any of their partners for not shipping a product which is so rarely used, especially in a common format like 8x10. These links also show that minimum order quantities were reached for quite a few films and at quite unusual sizes.Ilford, in its annual special sizes program, will supply any listed item regardless of how few boxes are ordered. Kodak, selling through retailers, will only cut and package non-stock sizes if a minimum quantity is ordered. Using TMAX 400 as an example, Canham has managed to complete only one 8x10 special order nearly 11 months ago, with a second attempt falling short in October
Of course Kodak is to blame I love their products but their management sucks or has the economic knowledge of an amoeba a soon as an item becomes special order or really hard to get people will turn to the easier available product in this case probably Ilford Hp5+, or as old German Austrian saying goes aus den Augen aus den Sinn (approx translation: out of view, out of mind). Since I am not using TMY in 8x10 I have to ask was Tmax only available trough Canham if that is the case than Kodak hasn't really given a thought about 75% of the worlds photographers (living outside the US) and is a 100% responsible for the downturn in it's LF Film sales. If on the other hand TMAX 400 was available worlwide trough worldwide distributors than the blames lies with the photographers and Kodak 50/50. h.v. the digital archiving won't get better in the future because the company producing the stuff don't want it to last longer, that's a fact and the companies openly admit it at least to archivists and the UNESCO.
Dominik
CGW take a look at my first paragraph if I have a monopoly I can do things like special order etc.. but if I am a one of a dozen fishs in a pond I have to be visible and I have to promote myself in order to be in demand. Kodak LF products were neither visible nor available thus lowering the demand for said products. Ilford and other manufacturers are much more proactive than Kodak and are being noticed especially by newcomers. Demand is created trough visibility and promotion and that's a marketing fact.
I don't blame Kodak's for reducing their product line it's the correct decision but they are not innocent in their downfall (see above paragraph) and they still have the big corporation mindset well they aren't anymore.
Dominik
CGW it did occur to me and as I said I agree with their decision to cut the filmsize from their program. But film sales wouldn't have dwindled that fast if Kodak would have been more proactive in promoting their products while in fact they have a CEO who openly states film is dead. I congratulate Kodak on bringing out new motion picture film, but cutting Ektar from their LF program sends the wrong message even if it is the right decision. I lay blame where blame is due on the CEO and the marketing dept. Kodak is and always has been a great company with superb products and stupid CEOs and marketing.
Dominik
Kodak LF products were neither visible nor available thus lowering the demand for said products. Ilford and other manufacturers are much more proactive than Kodak and are being noticed especially by newcomers. Demand is created trough visibility and promotion and that's a marketing fact.
There were about 300 boxes of tmy2 8x10 ordered; not 80, but it's still not much for a year's supply for the industry.
While a lot of commercial setups probably went the digital route during the last 10 years, I see quite a few amateurs taking advantage of the fire sale prices for used LF equipment. I personally know a few hobbyists who use LF cameras, for whom such equipment would have completely out of reach 20 years ago.Ever occur to you that fewer and fewer people are bothering with LF and/or that just possibly Kodak can't economically supply that dwindling demand?
Please don't ignore that Kodak heavily marketed their new Portra line of films and created quite some hype in the analog crowd - even I who swore to never touch color negative film ever again bought dozens of film rolls based on the glowing reviews I read here and elsewhere.Kodak's history is a history of bad advertising and promotion and I am dealing with it by saying it's the right decision to cut products that don't sell.
Canham states here, that at least 218 boxes must be preordered for a Kodak to start a run. They did not, however, and the page here states, that they were 140 boxes short, which means that 78 preorders were placed. That's where my number 80 came from. Your 300 number comes from adding the 218 boxes they ordered in January with the 78 boxes they did not order in October.
Either way: Kodak is still a huge company and I can understand why they didn't bother with 80 boxes of TMY 8x10.
While a lot of commercial setups probably went the digital route during the last 10 years, I see quite a few amateurs taking advantage of the fire sale prices for used LF equipment. I personally know a few hobbyists who use LF cameras, for whom such equipment would have completely out of reach 20 years ago.
Please don't ignore that Kodak heavily marketed their new Portra line of films and created quite some hype in the analog crowd - even I who swore to never touch color negative film ever again bought dozens of film rolls based on the glowing reviews I read here and elsewhere.
Canham states here, that at least 218 boxes must be preordered for a Kodak to start a run. They did not, however, and the page here states, that they were 140 boxes short, which means that 78 preorders were placed. That's where my number 80 came from. Your 300 number comes from adding the 218 boxes they ordered in January with the 78 boxes they did not order in October.
Either way: Kodak is still a huge company and I can understand why they didn't bother with 80 boxes of TMY 8x10.
h.v. the digital archiving won't get better in the future because the company producing the stuff don't want it to last longer, that's a fact and the companies openly admit it at least to archivists and the UNESCO.
Dominik
The ad "campaign" itself was pretty limp but thanks to the huge archipelago of blogs and boards, news and reviews went viral at no cost to Kodak. It's really nice film but Kodak didn't break the bank convincing us.
So basically this is the shipment of the preorders which were completed until January 2011. Instead of the minimum order quantity of 218 boxes 332 were preordered, it looks like a lot of these boxes went straight into the freezer and haven't been used up yet, hence there was not nearly as much demand in October.My 300 number was a little off. It's from an April 23 2011 facebook post by canham with a photo showing 332 boxes of tmy 8x10.
As Mark Barendt already mentioned, (successful) marketing has changed in the last 10 years. I wouldn't know of any marketing campaigns in photographic magazines because I don't read any of them. I did, however, notice the enthusiasm so many spread in all kinds of forum I cared about. Some may call it viral marketing, chances are there also was some astroturfing involved, we'll never know. It worked with me, though. Although Fuji is mostly absent from US and European forums, their introduction of Provia 400X was quite a success story. Again, I wouldn't even know about this great film if it wasn't for enthusiastic reports here on APUG.Please ignore my ignorance about Kodaks US marketing but in Germany and Austria their pro products aren't really promoted all that much especially their LF products.
Since LF cameras can be self made by skilled hobbyists I would even go as far as predicting that LF is going to be the last analog format around should that technology ever dwindle down into obscurity. Few to no people will be able to fix my RZ67, much less my EOS 3 in 30 years, but there will still be lots of people who can fold a bellows, adapt a lens, grind some glass and make a film holder out of wood.Don't know how big the writing on the wall has to be to catch people's attention aside from the order shortfalls about LF's prospects.
So what? The pro transition to D was completed many years ago yet LF film stock is still offered. I would be very surprised if LF film sales showed a strong decline during the last 3 years. And since you bring up E6 *again*: spend half the effort you put into "slide film is dying" postings into the learning of E6 home processing and you'll never look back at E6 labs anymore.Amateur/hobbyist demand isn't close now to what pro demand was for any film material a decade ago. Amateurs could get decent E6 service back then simply because so many pros shot transparency.
h.v. I am talking digital archiving as a whole btw the more powerful a harddrive is the more likely it is to fail. Facebook and Co is not even ten years old and the content of the profiles constantly changes (constantly rewritten). Germany has a huge Archive for it's digital documents and guess what they save it on microfilm. The best long term digital storage devise is the rosetta stone that nobody uses because nobody can afford it, the second best is magnetic tape (max 30 years that's not long term for an archivist) never believe the propaganda from the digital companies. The best affordable storage devise is Film yes good old Film nothing beats it for economy and and long term stability (under the right conditions). Germany and other countries store it in old mines under ideal conditions and expect it to survive the next 200 - 500 years (that's long term). This market is also unfortunately for Kodak pretty much in Agfa's and Fuji's hand.
Dominik
As Mark Barendt already mentioned, (successful) marketing has changed in the last 10 years. I wouldn't know of any marketing campaigns in photographic magazines because I don't read any of them. I did, however, notice the enthusiasm so many spread in all kinds of forum I cared about. Some may call it viral marketing, chances are there also was some astroturfing involved, we'll never know. It worked with me, though. Although Fuji is mostly absent from US and European forums, their introduction of Provia 400X was quite a success story. Again, I wouldn't even know about this great film if it wasn't for enthusiastic reports here on APUG.
Since LF cameras can be self made by skilled hobbyists I would even go as far as predicting that LF is going to be the last analog format around should that technology ever dwindle down into obscurity. Few to no people will be able to fix my RZ67, much less my EOS 3 in 30 years, but there will still be lots of people who can fold a bellows, adapt a lens, grind some glass and make a film holder out of wood.
CGW, you were very upset when I (there was a url link here which no longer exists) your constant "Analog is dying" postings but you really begin to sound like a single tune band by now. Nobody would have considered Cassandra prophetic had she announced the downfall of Troy as long as you have announced the imminent demise of slide film, LF photography, Kodak, and analog photography in general.
So what? The pro transition to D was completed many years ago yet LF film stock is still offered. I would be very surprised if LF film sales showed a strong decline during the last 3 years. And since you bring up E6 *again*: spend half the effort you put into "slide film is dying" postings into the learning of E6 home processing and you'll never look back at E6 labs anymore.
So there will be no slower speed bulk Kodak 35mm B & W film available regularly any more (both T-Max and Plus-X gone).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?