Some Kodak changes...

Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 1
  • 0
  • 9
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 1
  • 1
  • 20
Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 4
  • 0
  • 38

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,824
Messages
2,781,462
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Yes, I thought it was still 2010 :munch:

"According to their latest publically available accounts they had revenue of £22.6m and profit after tax of £1.4m for calendar year 2010 (though made a loss in 2009). So they were profitable in 2010, but there is no data to allow the reader to split revenue between film sales and other lines."

Shrug. I don't think 2011 figures are available yet, certainly not entire year figures since the year isn't over. That's the most recent data, AFAIK.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
I don't know - I can see "if you like Kodak buy it" but there's always the "don't get too used to because it will be gone next week" thought too.

In color I do like and use Kodak and will continue until it's gone. There's just nothing from Fuji that I'm aware of that's like Ektar 100, and nothing quite as good as the new Portras. I would use more E100G and E100VS but the demise of Ilfochrome even before I could get back into it leaves that less appealing than it would be otherwise. Besides, I don't think E100VS is available in sheets anymore anyway meaning for 4x5 I'd be using Velvia when I wanted amped up saturation.

I also recall PE saying that Ektar did not freeze well but maybe that was only the older version.
 

tomalophicon

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
1,568
Location
Canberra, AC
Format
Sub 35mm
I don't really see the issue.
It doesn't take too long in my experience to get used to using another film; I reckon use what you like while you can and accept and adapt to whatever changes occur in the future.
I'm using Kodak and Fuji films, and Ilford and Foma papers and chemicals. I use what I like and see no point siding with a brand based on something other than how you feel about the actual product.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
I think the reasoning is that the shrinking analog market has more players than it can keep afloat and it'd be better to have, say, two doing well than several struggling. But maybe you're right and it's best to let the market sort out the survivors and hope they aren't too bruised and bloodied by then to continue in business. But I admit I don't much trust "the market" - it's ruthlessly efficient but, like fire, is a capricious servant and a cruel master.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
But I admit I don't much trust "the market" - it's ruthlessly efficient but, like fire, is a capricious servant and a cruel master.

Keenly observed and most eloquently phrased...

Ken
 

thuggins

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
1,144
Location
Dallas, TX
Format
Multi Format
Here we have the typical doom and gloom predictions any time any company discontinues a film. We are looking at some fairly obscure products here. Does any really think that a single person who used to shoot 8x10 gave it up in favor of a digital PoS (Is that the right abbreviation?)?

Several years ago I asked my local lab if their E6 volume had dropped off. Their response was, "No, E6 has always been niche with devoted followers. No one who shoots E6 is going to give it up for digital." About a year ago I asked the same question and this time the response was, "Yes, some professionals have gone to the new negative films to get more leeway in the printing."

One way or the other, it is still film.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Ektar 100 and TXP are not obscure by any stretch of the imagination. 8x10 is one of the least used of the standard formats, granted, especially in color where the running costs are so high.
 

tomalophicon

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
1,568
Location
Canberra, AC
Format
Sub 35mm
My dad gave up E6 for digital. Among many others, I'm sure.
3 of the 4 photolabs in my town have closed in the last 5 years. The fourth doesn't do E6.
 

Michael W

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,594
Location
Sydney
Format
Multi Format
I use Kodak & Ilford.
I also use Fuji, Agfa, Ferrania, Foma, Forte, Konica, Lucky, Polaroid, Era & Scotch.
 

canuhead

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
832
Location
Southern Ont
Format
Multi Format
...We need competition in this world of film, and the more manufacturers there are, the better it is.

Exactly. If it boiled down to one player, I honestly would be very concerned that the need to be innovative would be tossed with the bathwater.

I'll be using Kodak's b/w products (and Acros tbh) until the day they kill them all in a scorched earth move and only then will I turn to other products. I don't choose film based on a company's shortsightedness or worry about 'learning' a new film. I never really thought going from Brand X to Brand Y was all that difficult in the grand scheme of things.
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
Yup. Scotch is a 3M brand. Though come to think of it, they might have been called 3M at some time and Scotch at another, or they might have been applied to different products. Though it seems like I saw film called 3M Scotch, but I'm not sure. I never liked Scotch.

Irish whiskey for me.
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,081
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
If you look carefully at the discontinuation notice, you'll notice three things:
  1. Plus X is going away. This may be bad for all those who loved that film, my condolences to them. Likewise I express my condolences to all 2 or 3 remaining bulk loaders who can't get TMAX 100 in 100ft. rolls any more.
  2. A number of roll films are no longer available in single packs but only in 5 packs. In the age of mail ordering and thinned out availability in brick and mortar stores, I prefer 5 packs anyway. I would like 10 or 20 packs even more if they were cheaper per film roll.
  3. A bunch of 8x10 film is special order only from now on. Remember Ilford's once a year "we cut to your size" offer and I can already see what will happen with Kodak's large format offers, as long as either Kodak or some savvy business person starts collecting many small orders and combines them into a special order volume (plus a profit).

So all together, the only real loss seems to be PlusX, everything else will end up only as inconvenience or slightly higher cost. Nothing to cheer about but no reason for panic either.
 

CGW

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
2,896
Format
Medium Format
Nothing to cheer about but no reason for panic either.

Kodak's reps aren't offering much comfort when they gush about sales figures but not volume. Volume matters and that's the worry.
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
American Scotch film from Italy. A little roll of identity crisis inside every box. :wink:
 

kb3lms

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
1,004
Location
Reading, PA
Format
35mm
IMHO, Kodak has a track record of pulling out of markets just before they do well, or do well again. 8mm video is an excellent example. Kodak got in early, didn't see film-like profits and then bailed out. About a year later every video camera maker was selling 8mm video like hotcakes. Verbatim and Sterling Drug would be further examples. There are many more, I am sure.

When people (as in general public) find out five or 10 years from now that they don't have any real pictures on paper and the baby pictures are long gone because of a corrupted memory card, fouled hard drive or the latest incarnation of Windows BS and Facebook has finally gone into the dark corners of the Wayback Machine where it truly belongs, things in the market may very well change. Most people's PCs don't work and they couldn't print a picture if they could actually figure out how to do it - and most can't. A generation of our history is disappearing into the bit-bucket. Kodak ought to market that.

We need an Open Source Color Film project and APUG is just the place for it. :smile:
 

Tim Gray

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
1,882
Location
OH
Format
35mm
I'll be using Kodak's b/w products (and Acros tbh) until the day they kill them all in a scorched earth move and only then will I turn to other products. I don't choose film based on a company's shortsightedness or worry about 'learning' a new film. I never really thought going from Brand X to Brand Y was all that difficult in the grand scheme of things.

Exactly. I love what TMY-2 and TMZ can do, so why would I stop using them while they are still available?

Then again, I started shooting film about 5-6 years ago, with the thinking that I was going to shoot it and enjoy it while it was still here to be enjoyed. And as long as I can continue to do that, it's great. I'll figure out the transition to Ilford, or in a worse case scenario, back to digital for everything, when the time comes.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,530
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
...A bunch of 8x10 film is special order only from now on. Remember Ilford's once a year "we cut to your size" offer and I can already see what will happen with Kodak's large format offers, as long as either Kodak or some savvy business person starts collecting many small orders and combines them into a special order volume (plus a profit)...So...will end up only as inconvenience...
Your conclusion about Kodak 8x10 320TXP simply being less convenient to obtain is incorrect.

Ilford, in its annual special sizes program, will supply any listed item regardless of how few boxes are ordered. Kodak, selling through retailers, will only cut and package non-stock sizes if a minimum quantity is ordered. Using TMAX 400 as an example, Canham has managed to complete only one 8x10 special order nearly 11 months ago, with a second attempt falling short in October

http://www.canhamcameras.com/kodakfilmstatus.html.

This despite his minimum number of boxes being 218, fewer than the B&H minimum of 245 boxes

http://www.canhamcameras.com/kodakfilm.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...MY_8_x_10.html.

Although B&H asks "only" $73.50 per box, compared to Canham's $77.00, it has not to my knowledge sold anyone the minimum quantity since 8x10 TMAX 400 became a special order item. Note that these are 10-sheet boxes.

Regardless of film size, Kodak requires an approximately $18,000 purchase for special orders. Ilford will deliver a single unique-size box of film even if it sells for $50 and only one is ordered. The likelihood of anyone being able to put together an 8x10 320TXP group order in the future is slight. I think this community will need to rely on Ilford for first-tier-quality 8x10 black and white film going forward. FP4 Plus is a fine film and performs similarly to 320TXP in many ways.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
A generation of our history is disappearing into the bit-bucket. Kodak ought to market that.

They can't. Kodak also disappeared into the bit-bucket...

:wink:

Ken
 

h.v.

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
186
Location
Alberta, Can
Format
Multi Format
IMHO, Kodak has a track record of pulling out of markets just before they do well, or do well again. 8mm video is an excellent example. Kodak got in early, didn't see film-like profits and then bailed out. About a year later every video camera maker was selling 8mm video like hotcakes. Verbatim and Sterling Drug would be further examples. There are many more, I am sure.

When people (as in general public) find out five or 10 years from now that they don't have any real pictures on paper and the baby pictures are long gone because of a corrupted memory card, fouled hard drive or the latest incarnation of Windows BS and Facebook has finally gone into the dark corners of the Wayback Machine where it truly belongs, things in the market may very well change. Most people's PCs don't work and they couldn't print a picture if they could actually figure out how to do it - and most can't. A generation of our history is disappearing into the bit-bucket. Kodak ought to market that.

We need an Open Source Color Film project and APUG is just the place for it. :smile:

This isn't 1999. The world is now in a different place. I think most people realize they are no longer getting prints done, and they're doing it by their own choice. Aside from the scrapbooking niche, most people aren't putting together physical photo albums anymore. If people do get prints, it's usually just a few things so that they can have it in a frame and on display. But now with digital picture frames, I predict that will become less popular as well. Most people are perfectly fine sharing photos over Facebook or Flickr photo albums. Besides, archiving your photos on a website, in my opinion, is a safer bet than keeping it on your personal hard drive. I've never heard of someone loosing their Facebook pictures because one of Facebook's drives died. Now with cloud computing, it seems even less likely.

So with that, I wouldn't count on a resurgence in film because people realize they don't have prints. You can always make prints from digital and most film nowadays isn't even printed, it's scanned. Digital archiving is only going to get safer and more secure in the future.
 

PKM-25

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
1,980
Location
Enroute
Format
Multi Format
Film: Just use it, make photographs with it and try to show people good work, get the word out that it still rocks, can be souped in your kitchen sink. Word of mouth and stellar visual examples of why people should use film are what is going to keep it around, not a big marketing campaign from Kodak or Ilford.

When I was a kid, it was the photographs I saw being made on film that made me want to use it, not an ad from the company that made it....
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom