OP, do you have other images that show the problem? Between overexposure and jumps in distances I am not certain what I am seeing. Depth of field, lens sharpness drop-off, halation leading to softness... And the fuzzy black edges add their own element. Sort of a Rorschach test image to discuss focus issues
Alright, homeboys. I guess I should have elaborated on the issue but in my defense, I was in a hurry because I have a small chubby boychild too look after.
Helge is correct, and even though we disagreed in another thread I extend my gratitude!
So, it’s not an alignment issue because I checked the film plane before shooting. Alignment issues always look like one half of the image is out of focus.
It’s not the lens elements either because I collimated the lens.
Yes, not super easy to parse. It’s expired xpro’d Ektachrome that I overexposed a bit. I was mainly looking for light leaks.
Here’s the negative, for posterity. Not the fuzzy underexposed edges:
Alignment issues always look like one half of the image is out of focus.
I've seen this before and think it's a lens issue. As the camera is new to the OP it may have been serviced beforehand and maybe some dust blown out from between the front and rear elements. If the rear element, the most likely one to be taken out for cleaning, isn't screwed in again all the way this is exactly the effect it gives. Old screw threads can gum up and on a folder putting enough torque into tightening the rear element is always scary unless the threads have been cleaned or the entire shutter removed.
Yes, I have checked focus across the film place. I don’t use ground glass for this because I find it hard to tell what’s in focus even with a loupe. Instead I use the „indoor infinity method“ with an SLR and some hair across the film gate.Really? Mine had a complex out-of-alignment issue that did not present itself as half the image out of focus. Have you checked focus with a piece of ground glass across the film rails? If the focused image is sharp across the entire ground glass, then it's definitely not an alignment issue.
This is my conclusion. I should have made it clear in my initial post that I have ruled out alignment etc etc leaving the pressure plate as the likely culprit.It's not a lens issue, it's not an alignment issue. I think the pressure plate is not holding the film flat. The film and winding mechanism has enough tension to almost hold the film flat, but not enough to prevent the film from curling on the edges.
Negative. Like I said earlier, the lens was collimated by me, nothing scary about it.I've seen this before and think it's a lens issue. As the camera is new to the OP it may have been serviced beforehand and maybe some dust blown out from between the front and rear elements. If the rear element, the most likely one to be taken out for cleaning, isn't screwed in again all the way this is exactly the effect it gives. Old screw threads can gum up and on a folder putting enough torque into tightening the rear element is always scary unless the threads have been cleaned or the entire shutter removed.
How would the lens result in two narrow bands at the edge of the frame?
Yes, I have checked focus across the film place. I don’t use ground glass for this because I find it hard to tell what’s in focus even with a loupe. Instead I use the „indoor infinity method“ with an SLR and some hair across the film gate.
This is my conclusion. I should have made it clear in my initial post that I have ruled out alignment etc etc leaving the pressure plate as the likely culprit.
Negative. Like I said earlier, the lens was collimated by me, nothing scary about it.
So somehow you must have a curved pressure plate, one that holds the film flat in the middle and is bent out towards the edges. Easy to measure, but now tell us how that happens? Maybe the pressure plate spring isn't strong enough so any longitudinally curvature in the film's base layer is over-riding the pressure plate spring, but the middle area of the negative would then be OOF and the edges sharper.
+1Folders use the natural curvature of film as a counter spring to keep flat and not bulge, instead of trying to brute force squeeze and stretch it flat.
i dont see any problems with film flatness, misalignment of the lens, pressure plate etc. in that image.
The image looks perfectly sharp except for the dark edges.
Dan Daniel had it right from the start. This is the bellows intruding into the image.
You can see it easy enough by opening the camera back, setting the camera on bulb, and looking through it.
The Super Ikonta iii is one of the smallest 6x6 folders with a rangefinder, and the bellows is just a bit too narrow.
I have one and love it.
These cameras are called 6x6 but never use the full 6x6 area of the film due to the rails.
Usually 56x56mm is about right but for the Super Ikonta iii you want to crop it down a bit more. 54x54mm should be about right.
Or even 56x54 if you like it a little more rectangular. Just keep that in mind when you are framing, leave a little buffer on the sides.
Advice for folders. Follow this sequence:
Do not advance film after taking picture, then close camera.
- Open camera
- Advance film
- Take picture
what do you do after the second film advance? close the camera? and what is the sequence for the next picture?An alternate approach is
But the key with either methodology is STAY CONSISTENT. I find my self saying, "did I advance the film or not"? Not a good place to be.
- Open camera
- Advance film
- Take picture
- Advance film
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?