Soft emulsion from permanganate B&W reversal

Night Drive 2

D
Night Drive 2

  • 1
  • 0
  • 634
Night Drive 1

D
Night Drive 1

  • 1
  • 0
  • 638
Sonatas XII-49 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-49 (Life)

  • 1
  • 1
  • 1K
市

A

  • 1
  • 3
  • 1K
Approaching fall

D
Approaching fall

  • 7
  • 4
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,710
Messages
2,795,503
Members
100,008
Latest member
nostalgia
Recent bookmarks
0

iandvaag

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
484
Location
SK, Canada
Format
Multi Format
I've been reversal processing B&W for quite some time now, using a permanganate bleach. It's widely reported (and I've noticed myself) that permanganate softens the gelatin. I've always used films treated with the modern family of hardeners (Ilford and Kodak), so I've never had much problem. As long as I keep temperatures at a consistent 20 degrees C, and "squeegee" carefully between my fingers, the only emulsion damage I've noticed is caused by the ball bearings when reloading the films onto Paterson reels after the second exposure.

Tonight was different. I decided to process some Rollei IR400 film. Throughout processing, I inspect the film, and noticed no problems until I poured out the rinse water following final development. I noticed little black flecks which I recognized as flakes of emulsion. I quit rinsing, removed the film, and hung to dry before I could cause further damage. Fortunately, it appears as most of the damage to the emulsion occurred between the sprocket holes and did not extend into the image area.

I am concerned that I did not complete washing. In my normal process, I also do a final fix to remove any non-light sensitive AgX that may not have been developable in the final developer. (Not sure if this is really required, I guess that potentially it could print out with enough exposure to light?) I would like to fix, wash and final rinse (photo flo) this film, but I am concerned that I may subject the film to further emulsion damage. After drying, and then re-wetting, will the emulsion still be soft, or does drying harden the film? Should a hardener be used, or wouldn't that help now? I have access to formaldehyde, but currently not chrome alum.

If anyone has any good resources on reversal processing, I'd love to hear. Haist is the best I've found so far, but permanganate bleach only occupies a couple pages of his discussion.
 

Europan

Member
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
641
Location
Äsch, Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
From my experience with commercial hand development I’d suggest a 2% bath for not more than five minutes at 20 °C, constant agitation.
Use an acetic acid stop bath, 30 seconds, before and a 3% clearing bath after the bleach, sodium sulfite.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
712
Location
Washington D
Format
Multi Format
can you use sodium sulfite with a permanganate bleach?

when I tried it the emulsion was totally destroyed and rinsed out right after using the sodium sulfite......the instructions I read at the time ( from Ilford, I think ) said to use sodium bisulfite IIRC

....or is that the purpose of the acetic acid stop? I think I used a water stop
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,770
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
the general rule is metabisulfite for permanganate bleaches, sulfite for dichromate bleaches.

I have no idea why.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
712
Location
Washington D
Format
Multi Format
the general rule is metabisulfite for permanganate bleaches, sulfite for dichromate bleaches.

I have no idea why.

I think I read that sulfite with permanganate creates bubbles within the emulsion that destroy the emulsion

not sure if that's what actually happened...but my emulsion was definitely ruined
 
OP
OP
iandvaag

iandvaag

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
484
Location
SK, Canada
Format
Multi Format
IIRC, the only difference between sulfite and metabisulfite solutions us their pH. The oxidation products of permanganate are soluble in acid, so metabisulfite with its lower ph is used. The oxidation products of dichromate are more soluble in the more alkaline strait sulfite solution. I double check Haist tonight and post again if this is wrong.

Anybody have advice on rewetting a film with emulsion damage? Am I good, or am I asking for trouble? Do I need a hardener, or is it too late for that?
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Potassium permanganate is an oxidizing agent. You do not want to use it with any of the sulfites which are reducing agents.

Whenever there is a problem with reversal it is usually caused by people not following the instructions exactly whether formulas or methods. Stick with Ilford's strength recommendation for the bleach. Do ont exceed their time and temperature recommendations. If you can obtain potassium dichromate this is a better choice but hard to get with today's environmental regulations.

Once again you cannot sort of, maybe, sometimes, mostly, ... follow Ilford's instructions. Reversal is very different than ordinary development. There is essentially no latitude for variations in the method. That being said some films stand up better to reversal than others.
 
Last edited:

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
For the film in question try first using a hardening bath such as 3% chrome alum for five minutes normal agitation. Then followed by normal washing. I hope that none of the images are considered to be irreplaceable.
 
  • iandvaag
  • iandvaag
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Accidental post
  • Deleted member 2924
  • Deleted

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Using a more dilute solution for a longer period of time may actually cause more softening of the emulsion than following Ilford's instructions.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
If the emulsion comes off in bits and pieces, then it could be the type of subbing used between the film base and the emulsion. The flakes are hardened emulsion lifting away from a "destroyed" subbing layer. In this case, there is probably nothing that can be done and indicates that the film in question cannot be processed by this method.

IDK for sure, of course.

PE
 

Athiril

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
Switch to a dichromate bleach. It is so much more reliable and doesn't damage your film like Permanganate bleaches.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
712
Location
Washington D
Format
Multi Format
Switch to a dichromate bleach. It is so much more reliable and doesn't damage your film like Permanganate bleaches.

re: dichromate & toxicity...doesn't the sulfite bath change the chromate into a less toxic form...going from hexavalent to something else?...forget the details but I was under the impression that after the sulfite bath the potassium dichromate has changed into something less dangerous....is that true...or just another bit of internet disinformation?
 
OP
OP
iandvaag

iandvaag

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
484
Location
SK, Canada
Format
Multi Format
Potassium permanganate is an oxidizing agent. You do not want to use it with any of the sulfites which are reducing agents.

TL;DR – It's not the red/ox chemistry that makes a strait sulfite solution unsuitable, it's the acidity of the solution (and solubility of the oxidation products at the solution's pH).

True, KMnO4 is an oxidizing agent and sulfite is a reducing agent (Cr2O7 is also an oxidizing agent, albeit less powerful than MnO4). However, metabisulfite dissolves to bisulfite in solution, which is essentially a sulfite solution at lower pH ((there was a url link here which no longer exists) for more authoritative voices). So by using either a bisulfite or metabisulfite clearing bath, you are effectively using permanganate (oxidizer) with bisulfite (reducer). This is why the clearing bath is effective.

The reason bisulfite or metabisulfite are used with KMnO4 bleaches (rather than strait sulfite), is to produce an acidic solution. This means that Mn has an oxidation state of (II) and is soluble. If a strait sulfite solution (with no added acid) were used, the Mn would be left in the (IV) oxidation state, leaving insoluble MnO2 in the emulsion.

Note: the reaction does evolve SO2 gas however, so be sure to ventilate well.

Whenever there is a problem with reversal it is usually caused by people not following the instructions exactly whether formulas or methods. Stick with Ilford's strength recommendation for the bleach. Do ont exceed their time and temperature recommendations. If you can obtain potassium dichromate this is a better choice but hard to get with today's environmental regulations.

Once again you cannot sort of, maybe, sometimes, mostly, ... follow Ilford's instructions. Reversal is very different than ordinary development. There is essentially no latitude for variations in the method. That being said some films stand up better to reversal than others.

I really appreciate what you are saying, however it's widely reported by users that Ilford's bleach contains too much KMnO4, thereby softening the emulsion unnecessarily. I can fully bleach the film (by inspection) in about five minutes (Ilford's recommended time) using half of the KMnO4 (1g/L). I don't believe this is weakening the emulsion any more than Ilford's suggested 5min bath at 2g/L. If Ilford gave any supporting evidence/rationale for certain parts of their process, I'd be more inclined to follow it closely, however many people find that some of the practices outlined in their .pdf are not practically useable. I realize what I'm saying here may be contentious – I don't mean to provoke. I know doing anything outside of the specs is asking for trouble, and I accept full responsibility for failed results. None-the-less, I'm sure Ilford wouldn't suggest their canon process for this film, so I think some modifications may be appropriate. I'm asking here on APUG because I want to learn more chemistry and this seems to be one of the last places where people are pushing the envelope to exploit a broad array of truly magical possibilities of chemical photography. There's really something special to this place.

For the film in question try first using a hardening bath such as 3% chrome alum for five minutes normal agitation. Then followed by normal washing. I hope that none of the images are considered to be irreplaceable.

Thanks for this suggestion, I'll see if I can find some chrome alum. Since this was the first time doing this, it was a test roll with images that don't mean much to me.

Use a lower temperature (eg. 18°C).

Good advice.

Use sodium bisulfate as the acidifier of the bleach bath (don't use plain sulfuric acid).

I do use sodium bisulfate (as I can't source sulfuric acid), but I don't understand from a chemisty standpoint why this would make any difference.

Do not squegee. Use a chemical reversal bath (dithionite). Do not fix afterwards.

I agree on not squeegeeing. I imagine chem reversal (probably try Na2S) would help due to not having to load and unload the film on reels. Is there a reason why you suggest against fixing? I'm not sure I really understand the arguments for or against.

If the emulsion comes off in bits and pieces, then it could be the type of subbing used between the film base and the emulsion. The flakes are hardened emulsion lifting away from a "destroyed" subbing layer. In this case, there is probably nothing that can be done and indicates that the film in question cannot be processed by this method. IDK for sure, of course.

Fair enough. Thanks.

Switch to a dichromate bleach. It is so much more reliable and doesn't damage your film like Permanganate bleaches.

I currently can't source it here in Canada. Also, I'm a hack. As a college kid souping film in his bathroom, I'm not sure that I feel safe working with dichromate. I appreciate the suggestion though, dichromate is better in every way: more stable in solution, hardens gelatin, fast acting, and its exhaustion properties (easy to tell when it's no longer good because the exhausted Cr (III) is green).

Chromium is chromium!

I'm not sure I understand. Doesn't bioavailability (i.e. toxicity) depend on oxidation state? Cr (III) is in your multivitamin, Cr (VI) will kill you. A chemical’s speciation can change, so it can go from benign to deadly. Just like a child who eats lead paint chips. As we know, this can be very toxic. But if you give the child enough cola (with phosphoric acid), the lead will precipitate out as pyromorphite, and pass through their GI tract harmlessly.

========================

Things I learned from this thread (thanks to all of you):

1. Emulsion damage was in the sprocket area, so chem fogging (not removing/reloading films onto reels) might help.
2. Careful temperature control, processing at a lower temperature and careful agitation could help reduce the toll taken on the emulsion.
3. Despite my best efforts, the film may not be compatible with my process (KMnO4).

Some questions moving forward:

I fundamentally do not understand hardening of films, and I really want to learn more. At what point in the process should it be carried out? How reversible is the hardening reaction? Does drying a film harden it, or does it become soft again when it is re-wet? Does putting the film in alkaline solutions negate a hardener's effects? (My reversal process has a lot of changes in pH: alkaline FD, acid bleach, mild acid clear, alkaline 2nd dev). Any way of hardening with formaldehyde (I don't have access to chrome alum currently.)

Thanks as always for your responses. We really have a special community here that I treasure greatly.
 
OP
OP
iandvaag

iandvaag

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
484
Location
SK, Canada
Format
Multi Format
Here's an image of the emulsion damage from the end of the roll. The vertical line in the middle is from my small metal film clip. Shockingly, not a single frame has emulsion damage extending into the image area, nor any flecks of emulsion from elsewhere adhered onto the surface of the image. Now that the film has dried, I tried scratching the emulsion with my fingernail near the end of the roll, where it looks like it's peeling in the photo below. I could not dislodge any flakes of emulsion, nor could I scratch it.

june4_16_ir400_reversal_AA041.jpg
 

Athiril

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
There's one method I found with permanganate that doesn't damage the film so much, but it is a pita, and that is to use it in combination with citric acid instead. You have to change the bleach 3-4 times with fresh bleach as citric acid slowly destroys the bleach I've found, and it takes about 30-40 minutes to do it last I tried, changing about every 10 minutes. The weakened bleach doesn't seem to be as harsh.

Maybe you can try a combination of permanagnate, sulfuric acid or bisulphate with a little citric acid to weaken it and see if it still damages the film like this, ymmv.
 

Athiril

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
I have an idea ill see if I can try tomorrow before I go on holiday for a new reversal bleach
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Chromium as Cr(III) is considered as an essential trace mineral. It is involved along with insulin in the metabolism of glucose. Typical supplements are 0.2 mg daily. AFAIK there is no level considered safe for Cr(VI). However Cr(VI) is a powerful oxidizing agent and is soon degraded in the environment. The use of potassium dichromate in reversal bleaches is safe if the usual precautions are taken. Use nitrile gloves and safety goggles or shield. After use destroy any remaining dichromate by the addition of sodium sulfite to the used bleach. This convert the chromium to the Cr(III) valence state. The bleach will turn from orange to green. Practically speaking, in the amounts used by the home enthusiast chromium in the III state is safe to discharge in waste water. However environmental rules are written for the commercial user and usually do not consider occasional use. So be careful not to run afoul of local governments.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
The reason why permanganate must be used in acid solution is to prevent the depositing of black, insoluble manganese dioxide in the emulsion.
 

davedm

Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
122
Format
35mm
I bleach about 5-6 minutes, to completion, by inspection. I use less permanganate than Ilford suggests though; I use 1g/L.

If you are using 1g/l then 6 minutes is borderline on damaging the emulsion. Try developing without inspection (strips if necessary) for 3.5, 4 and 5 minutes. Agitate as vigorously as possible (Even when developing by inspection). IMHO 3.5 to 4 min should suffice to clear the film.
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,084
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
Would 100 g/l Sodium Sulfate (not Sulfite! ) added to the bleach reduce the swell caused by KMnO4 ?
 
  • Deleted member 2924
  • Deleted
  • Deleted member 2924
  • Deleted
  • Deleted member 2924
  • Deleted

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,084
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
The rationale behind using bisulfate is that being in powder form is much more safer to handle. The sulfate anion in solution forms partly sodium sulfate which counteracts the gelatine swelling to an extent, thus reducing damage somewhat.

You need quite a bit of Sulfate ion to achieve an anti-swelling effect, much more than you likely add in the form Sodium Bisulfate in your bleach formula.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Chromium, once in the environment, is a danger. So, even though the chromium in your vitamins are safe, the huge amount in the bleach presents a problem. Even reduced it can be a problem due to relatively large amounts of trace dichromate which may remain in your mixture. I guess I was being cautious with it, even though I have used it for years.

Hardening is both permanent and reversible. Aldehydes and other compounds used in some hardening methods (formalin and glyoxal) are generally permanent but Alum and Chrome Alum can be reversed. Alum more so than Chrome Alum. Hardening works by raising the melting point of raw gelatin (20 deg C) and by decreasing swell. It is done by linking together the chains of natural polymers in gelatin.

PE
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom