First let me state that I am dreadfully sorry that I made that comment about PE's motives. I know that if we were together in the same room, we would not have had some of the interchanges you have seen here. I am old enough to spend a lot of time talking to myself about dumb things I do. "Gainer, you ass, why did you do that?" I used to have interactions with office mates that made witnesses think we were deadly enemies, and then we would take a break, go out to the Coke machine, flip to see who paid, go back into the fray, and eventually solve the problem.
The stated function of the sulfate in the original recipe was in fact to reduce swelling of the emulsion. The chloride is not as effective in that function, but it serves the additional function of silver halide solvent. I would assume that is why A&T suggested that if sodium chloride is added, the sodium sulfate should be left out. The OP simply wanted to know if sulfate and bisulfate were interchangeable, and there was nothing wrong with PE's reply. My comment was in effect, here is a good reason to try the experiment suggested by A&T because ir might take a week or more to get sodium sulfate, but non iodized salt is commonly available at the grocery store, and at least it's food grade, and canning salt IIRC is maybe even better.
Emulsion swelling is a subject of considerable discussion in Mees & James, as I know PE knows quite well, and there is a list of various salts in order of their ability to promote swelling, but no numerical values attached. Sulfate is least likely to promote swelling and chloride is about halfway up the list. There is also the statement that in an alkaline developer, the thing that keeps the alkali from excessively swelling the emulsion is the salt content, meaning salt in the general way, not specifically sodium chloride.
I am not telling PE anything new, as he illustrated in Post #16 above. It seems strange to me that no one has read A&T's rationale for the original formula or that for the suggested revision. It's in Chapter 9 under the subheading D-23 two-bath developers.