So one has got to go: caltar ii-n 150mm or ebc 135mm fujinon w

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 6
  • 0
  • 84
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 9
  • 1
  • 80
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 3
  • 2
  • 66
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 5
  • 1
  • 68

Forum statistics

Threads
198,945
Messages
2,783,620
Members
99,756
Latest member
Kieran Scannell
Recent bookmarks
0

heespharm

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
527
Format
Medium Format
So I'm trying to thin the heard of large format lenses I own and wann keep just one... Which one do I keep

Caltar ii-n 150mm or fujinon w 135mm mc
 
OP
OP

heespharm

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
527
Format
Medium Format
The one with the largest image circle.

Peter Gomena

image circle is the practically the same... 206mm vs 214mm

fujinon w 135mm in copal 0 with metal ring ebc coated with 52mm filter ring = 206mm

rodenstock non apo sironar N MC 150mm with 49mm filter ring = 214mm ic (not caltar ii N)
 

wiseowl

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Messages
423
Location
S Wales
Format
4x5 Format
So where do you live and what are you asking for them?
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,941
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
It all depends on what you shoot most. If you shoot landscapes and architecture primarily, then a slightly wide angle of the 135 would be preferred. If you shoot a mix of subjects and portraiture, the 150 may be more versitile.
 
OP
OP

heespharm

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
527
Format
Medium Format
Yeah I think I'm gonna stick with the 135... I like the slight wider angle and it looks like the coating on the Fuji is nicer than the non-apo sironar
 

Pupfish

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
307
Location
Monterey Co,
Format
4x5 Format
APO designation

The Sironar N's had no changes to their specs other than name when they went "APO". I have two Caltar IIN versions and they're very fine lenses indeed.
 

pgomena

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2003
Messages
1,391
Location
Portland, Or
As Rick said above. 135 is in the middle of the focal length range for 4x5 cameras. It's a slightly wide normal. You have plenty of room on either side for a shorter or longer addition to your kit when you feel the need. I prefer a 150, but only because I have a 120 and a 210. A 135 would be a bit redundant for me. You may choose to go with a 90 and 180 as additional lenses. It's nice to have choices.

Peter Gomena
 
OP
OP

heespharm

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
527
Format
Medium Format
Well I already have a 90, 180, 210, 250, and 305 oh and a 240 g claron for 8x10 so I don't need both the 135 and 150
 

photobum

Member
Joined
May 18, 2003
Messages
418
Location
Northern Vir
Format
Large Format
With that spread I'd keep the 150 and sell the 135 and the 180. But what I would really do is very careful testing on all the lenes and see what ones are really sharp. Then cul from the sharpnest list. Depending on how that shakes out you might have a standard 90-150-210-305 group or a 135-180-250.
 
OP
OP

heespharm

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
527
Format
Medium Format
Meh thanks for all the help guys I decided to sell my 135 and 180 ... They are in the for sale forum
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom