I'm not sure if Kodak Australia ever made film.
An internet search shows up a number of US sellers of the Ilford Pan films. You can get it easily enough.
As I said in my post, this was a sales person in Denver (Colorado) not in Australia. He actually worked at Rochester and visited his Rocky Mountain sales area once a month. Regardless of who you wish to believe, first hand experience using both tells me that the films were quite different.The anti-halation and substrate differences between late version Verichrome Pan and Plus X Professional meant that they printed entirely differently. They would also account for a difference in staining behavior.
A sales rep working for Kodak Australia would not be likely to know better than the manager in charge of film production in Rochester.
Unless of course, Kodak Australia had a film production line for either film at the time. I'm not sure if Kodak Australia ever made film. I believe Canadian Kodak did at one time. I know that Kodak Ltd. (UK) and Kodak Pathe (France) did.
Don't forget we are in UK you are in Canada, the copyright terms may be different.I did a search, and there are only two Kentmere trademarks registered in the UK. Both are owned by Harman Technologies, which has the familiar address in Mobberley.
The first mark was first registered in 1973 and is the 4 K logo with the word Kentmere next to it. This mark applies to Sensitised photographic paper.
The second mark is simply the word Kentmere, first registered in 2008 and applies to Paper, plastic, fabric or film based media used as a printing substrate in ink jet printers.
Anyone would be free to use the word Kentmere in relation to any goods or services that are not covered by the description of use of the two registered marks.
Copyright and Trademark protect different things and are not that same. There are a number of international treaties for Intellectual Property, so the rules around the world are amazingly similar. I have actually worked with UK patents and trademarks, so am familiar with the UK and EU rules.Don't forget we are in UK you are in Canada, the copyright terms may be different.
Verichrome maybe, not necessarily Verichrome Pan. And you can make two (or more emulsions) of different speeds and blend those, and coat as a single layer - or make 3-4 and coat as two layers of various blends etc. If you don't need to coat as discreet layers and can blend/ coat two emulsions as one, you do so (fewer interlayer interactions to negate). It might have been a bit pioneering in the 1930s when multiple layer coatings were a bit of a challenge, but not by the 1950s, let alone today.
Maybe Verichrome Pan formula was changed when they stop production of #828, 127, 620, 116, 122 and other obsolete by then formats and continued with that modified Plus-X? Kodak also made Verichrome (Pan?) in 70mm. Verichrome Pan is still listed, but only in #120, in Kodak Professional products Technical information booklet from 1989.
Thank you Lachlan for explanation! And what is B-38?moved to B-38
It is Building 38 at Kodak Park which contains the remaining coating machines.Thank you Lachlan for explanation! And what is B-38?
PAN 100 and 400 are still available alongside the Kentmere films.
Both of these films have been available in UK for a long time. I don't know how long because I didn't keep a check. They have in all that time been sold via a limited number of companies one of which is called 'Firstcall' and who are still selling them now.They have had stocks I will hazard a guess for something approaching 10-15 years at least. Certainly before Kentmere was absorbed into the Ilford company.Not long ago these films were not even marketed in the UK, now they are available via several online stores, in Europe as well. In my country, they were available since their introduction in the 90s.
My point exactly.Kentmere is a different film.
Good. In my country since their release in the 1990s.Both of these films have been available in UK for a long time.
Sounds exactly like their scheme with the Arista EDU films.Kentmere is Ilford’s “budget” brand meant for the educational market where they sell it for a little less margin in an effort to help students and schools out
Huh? This type of marketing happens everywhere, including the car market, for instance VW/Skoda/Seat. Whether it's helpful or not for the companies I don't know, I suspect that marketing is largely governed by unfalsifiable doctrines anyway, but to some customers having the choice might be beneficial.Frankly, I don't understand the reasoning behind this type of marketing, which is why almost no one does it. Imagine Ford offering a "discount" brand Ford car w/ budget cuts and less good materials and features? They would be stupid to do that, so they don't.
If you are in the market for a new car and the super deluxe models are out of your pocket but a budget version is available at good discount which will do most of what the super deluxe version will do, but for less money then I may be tempted to go for the budget version. Some cars come equipped with all versions of 'bells and whistles' which are all 'add-ons', cost more and you may not need them. The budget version would win for me every time.Sounds exactly like their scheme with the Arista EDU films.
Frankly, I don't understand the reasoning behind this type of marketing, which is why almost no one does it. Imagine Ford offering a "discount" brand Ford car w/ budget cuts and less good materials and features? They would be stupid to do that, so they don't.
The way Ilford is doing it is diluting the brand name, losing a LOT of public exposure to the brand name, and just obviously confusing buyers, as seen in this thread. Just sell the same dang products with the same label to the schools at a discount and avoid all this.
Keep the one and only brand name, and the increased sales of selling ONE premium product instead of two (and one of them being "less-premium" anyway) means you can lower the prices and sell even more. These guys need a lesson in marketing one-o-one.
I don't know if Ford does this, but Chrysler/Stellantis offers truck chassis lines designed for purchase, customization and sale as, for example, tow trucks or campers or repair vans or whatever.Frankly, I don't understand the reasoning behind this type of marketing, which is why almost no one does it. Imagine Ford offering a "discount" brand Ford car w/ budget cuts and less good materials and features? They would be stupid to do that, so they don't.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?