reakeener1970
Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2015
- Messages
- 52
- Format
- 35mm
Hi!
My first post so hope it is in the right spot.
I am shooting transparency/slide film in both 35mm and Medium format but could use some advice.
What I shoot will sometimes depend on how much gear I can carry with me, but would like to try to skew toward Medium format or 35mm when able.
Obviously bigger negative = better resolution all things being equal.
I (44 years old) have seen plenty of 35mm slide shows in my life, though not for a long time, but precisely zero medium format slide shows. Just wondering what the difference is like to anyone out there who has seen MF slide projections. Is it a big difference between the two as far as crispness of image and detail? I know there are other factors such as distance from viewing screen, projector lens, etc. But if all else equal, in an average room, on a slide projection screen, will a MF (6x6 Hasselblad) slide be noticeably better than a 35mm slide (from either Nikon F2 shooting Nikon primes, or Bessa R3A shooting Jupiter 8)
Just curious.
Also, for bonus points...
Recommended projectors? (More concerned with quality over availability of parts -- can scrounge for scarce parts if necessary)
Projectors that can do both 35mm and MF (I think there is a Rollei that can, any others anyone knows about -- and is that dual-format capable Rollei any good? Or better to get separate 35mm and MF projectors?)
Feel free to comment on any of the above (don't feel you need to do all)
Thanks!!
My first post so hope it is in the right spot.
I am shooting transparency/slide film in both 35mm and Medium format but could use some advice.
What I shoot will sometimes depend on how much gear I can carry with me, but would like to try to skew toward Medium format or 35mm when able.
Obviously bigger negative = better resolution all things being equal.
I (44 years old) have seen plenty of 35mm slide shows in my life, though not for a long time, but precisely zero medium format slide shows. Just wondering what the difference is like to anyone out there who has seen MF slide projections. Is it a big difference between the two as far as crispness of image and detail? I know there are other factors such as distance from viewing screen, projector lens, etc. But if all else equal, in an average room, on a slide projection screen, will a MF (6x6 Hasselblad) slide be noticeably better than a 35mm slide (from either Nikon F2 shooting Nikon primes, or Bessa R3A shooting Jupiter 8)
Just curious.
Also, for bonus points...
Recommended projectors? (More concerned with quality over availability of parts -- can scrounge for scarce parts if necessary)
Projectors that can do both 35mm and MF (I think there is a Rollei that can, any others anyone knows about -- and is that dual-format capable Rollei any good? Or better to get separate 35mm and MF projectors?)
Feel free to comment on any of the above (don't feel you need to do all)
Thanks!!