Sistan

Dog Opposites

A
Dog Opposites

  • 1
  • 1
  • 70
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

A
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

  • 5
  • 3
  • 139
Finn Slough Fishing Net

A
Finn Slough Fishing Net

  • 1
  • 0
  • 88
Dried roses

A
Dried roses

  • 13
  • 7
  • 167
Hot Rod

A
Hot Rod

  • 5
  • 0
  • 105

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,462
Messages
2,759,425
Members
99,510
Latest member
Tiarchi
Recent bookmarks
0

thefizz

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
2,336
Location
Ireland
Format
Medium Format
I wish to know how Sistan compares to toning for archival purposes.

I don't want to change image colour so I was planning on using Sistan instead of toning. I know Selenium can be used in a way that changes the colour very little but Sistan is so easy to use and saves time.

Any thoughts?

Peter
 

John Simmons

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
934
Location
Michigan
Format
Medium Format
Selenium may or may not cause a colorshift depending on the dilution, duration, and paper type. At dilution levels that are thought to give archival permanence (1+9 or less) you still have to tone the entire print to completion to be truely archival (according the Tim Rudman's book...the Photographers Toning Manual). Anyway, sistan is also mentioned in the book and Mr Rudman agreed that in theory it should work... but there has been no published research to document it...even from agfa.
 

mono

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
548
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Sistan has nothing to do with toning, it is just for archival purposes.
 
OP
OP
thefizz

thefizz

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
2,336
Location
Ireland
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for the replys.

Yes I know Sistan is not a toner but I wanted to know how it preformed archivally when compared to toning a print.
 

mono

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
548
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I mostly use both: Selenium and Sistan! Just for "eternity" ;-))
 

Ed Sukach

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
4,517
Location
Ipswich, Mas
Format
Medium Format
thefizz said:
Thanks for the replys.

Yes I know Sistan is not a toner but I wanted to know how it preformed archivally when compared to toning a print.
I use Sistan - a LOT, and I've asked the same question.

The best I've been able to obtain is: "In theory, it SHOULD work - and work well, but we have no objective evidence that it, in fact, does."

Then again - hard, objective information about the longevity increased by ANY form of toning is not easy to find.
 

mono

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
548
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I think it depends on one`s own preferences!?
 

blansky

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2002
Messages
5,952
Location
Wine country, N. Cal.
Format
Medium Format
Sistan is like "faith" or taking vitamins.

You hope it works, you can't see it work, some people will swear it works but in the end, who knows.

Selenium is a chemical process that converts the silver to something a bit more stable so it too should work.

You probably won't get a color shift unless you are using warm tone papers.


Michael
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,021
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
See Ctein's article (mentioned elsewhere) for details.

Basically, Sistan is a solution of sodium thiocyanate. When a photo is soaked in Sistan, the thiocyanate acts like a mild 'toner' in the sense that as it oxidizes in air, it forms a sulfur coating on the silver image and acts to preserve it. The level is so low that you see no toning, but silver sulfide is formed to a tiny extent, and it forms slowly from what I understand of the chemistry.

Your print is protected from air by the silver sulfide coating on the silver image.

PE
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom