It may be noteworthy that Aristophanes and I had a quite civilized exchange which we continued via PM, again, in a civilized and friendly fashion. I am interested in opinions which differ from mine but don't accept them at face value when I think they are incorrect and/or based on wrong assumptions. It would be highly unfair for me towards Aristophanes to further comment on his postings as he is no longer part of APUG. Please note that I was neither part nor factor in Aristophanes' recent decision to leave APUG.Unlike some folks on APUG I was never rubbed the wrong way by people writing from their own experience or who post less than optimistic forecasts about certain photographic processes.
I never saw this spirit in evidence in any of your recent exchanges with Aristophanes and others in threads on Kodak's torment, just full throttle vituperation and bile.
Kodak probably killed their kit because despite all the APUG fury against BLIX it appears that most home amateurs didn't want to put up with 6+ bathes. Eat that, pro labs! You still seem to get the Arista Kit in N. America.BTW, "declining demand" is incontrovertible--sad, granted, but true nonetheless. PlusX sales/use dwarfed B&W off brands in N. America. Demand for b&w materials tanked and what's left is barely visible(recall that Kodak's decision to end B&W paper production likely wasn't the result of spite). Home E6 processing? C'mon. Again, Kodak killed their small batch kit, too. Why?
I did never deny the decline in demand for analog materials during the last decade. What I did try to point out, though, is that some product lines were better at adapting to that decline than others, and that pro labs appear to me as especially unfit to meet the demands and hit the wallets of today's analog shooters, at least here in my home town.