Silkscreen application of Platinum emulsions?

Leaving Kefalonia

H
Leaving Kefalonia

  • 0
  • 0
  • 42
Lightning Strike

A
Lightning Strike

  • 1
  • 2
  • 56
Scales / jommuhtree

D
Scales / jommuhtree

  • 1
  • 2
  • 40
3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 7
  • 7
  • 187

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,067
Messages
2,785,755
Members
99,793
Latest member
Django44
Recent bookmarks
0

eli griggs

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
3,856
Location
NC
Format
Multi Format
Has anyone here tried applying platinum emulsion by using a silkscreen?

If so what were the results, pros and cons?

Eli
 

Jeremy

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
2,761
Location
Denton, TX
Format
Multi Format
Con: ridiculous waste of emulsion adding up to $$$$$$$.

When coating an 11"x14" screen with emulsion in silkscreening I use ~4 oz. When coating paper for an 11"x14" pt/pd print I use ~1.5mL.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're asking. The only thing I can think that would be similar is the photo-resist emulsion on the screen. If you're talking about applying the pt/pd emulsion through a screen that has already been prepared for printing then you'd waste even more emulsion.

Silkscreening is done the way it is because the constituents for the process are so cheap.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
The only thing I can think that would be similar is the photo-resist emulsion on the screen.

It's basically a potassium bichromate/dichromate emulsion.

We have gallons of it here at work but I have never tried it for photographic use. I must try it out one day.

I have also thought about coating emulsion with a screen. I think one of our fine stainless steel meshes without a stencil would produce quite a thin coat.


Steve.
 
OP
OP
eli griggs

eli griggs

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
3,856
Location
NC
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for the feedback.

I'm asking as I'm curious as to which would waste less emulsion, a paint brush applicator or a fine screen process? As a painter, I see how much material a good brush will pick-up, lay-down and what washes out in the clean-up.

A screen used to coat a number of sheets at one time would seem to be a better choice but real world experience is often different than theory.

While I'm asking questions, does anyone here think an inkjet could be modified to lay-down emulsion?
 

richard ide

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Wellington C
Format
Multi Format
Why not use a fine spray gun or airbrush. There might be a toxicity problem with aerial droplets.
 

rdbkorn

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2007
Messages
31
Format
Medium Format
The bad news - the pt/pd sensitizer doesn't have the viscosity of silkscreen inks, so unlikely to work. However, the good news is that many people use a "puddle pusher" to spread sensitizer onto paper. It's made of a glass tube with "handle" and is similar to a silkscreen squeegee in terms of operation. No screen necessary, the sensitizer is spread directly on the paper with the puddle pusher.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
The bad news - the pt/pd sensitizer doesn't have the viscosity of silkscreen inks, so unlikely to work.

Is it too thin to remain in a flooded screen?


Steve.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom