Shopping for first TLR, a few questions

OP
OP

Christophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2016
Messages
77
Location
Maple Valley, WA
Format
35mm
Thanks for the replies. I have a line on a freshly rebuilt Minolta Autocord, so I think I'm going to be set. That said, I can easily see myself collecting a few more out of interest once I get my reliable shooter situated. Looking at eBay, camera stores, etc, approximately what percentage of TLRs would you guess are good to go and don't need an overhaul? Are there any tips on what to look for (assuming Internet sales where you can't check them out). It seems to me like a total crap shoot, I'm just wondering at what rate would I expect to not need an immediate CLA.
 

Arklatexian

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,777
Location
Shreveport,
Format
Multi Format

Why don't you check with one of the repair companies that specialize in Rollei products and see if they have any used Rolleiflexes that have been overhauled or at the least CLA'd , for sale. If you go to the right ones, they can and probably will answer the questions about the different models. As to Rollei Ts, I had rather have a good Rolleicord than a "T". We had not very good experience with the "Ts" when they were new and I was a salesman trying to sell them and, more important, trying to keep them sold.........Regards!
 

piu58

Member
Joined
May 29, 2006
Messages
1,531
Location
Leipzig, Germany
Format
Medium Format
I vote for a Cord instead of a "T" too. The crank is not worth some hundred dollars.
I you want to have the better Planar optics, then go for a 3,5F or a 2,8F. If you thin a Tesar is ok., go for a cord. I owned some cord and like the Vb most. It has the bright screen the later Flexes have.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,256
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
These cameras are all elderly. Every old film camera I acquire i figure on a CLA. The two I have purchased that clearly stated they had just had or did not require a CLA to go out and start shooting absolutely DID need work by a competent technician. Just add about $200-250 to whatever you're spending to be sure it is operating the way it should. That's just the way it is.
 
OP
OP

Christophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2016
Messages
77
Location
Maple Valley, WA
Format
35mm
Sounds like "recent CLA" in an ad shouldn't add any value, since it can't really be trusted. I think I'm set now, waiting to finalize on an Autocord, but if I use it enough I might treat myself to a really nice Rollei next year. I'll be sure to just assume it'll need a rebuild regardless of what the ad says.
 

mooseontheloose

Moderator
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
4,110
Location
Kyoto, Japan
Format
Multi Format
I think you'll be happy with the Autocord - it was my first TLR and it's my favourite of all of them. After 10 years of shooting various brands of TLRs I finally got myself a Rolleiflex, and was kind of surprised at how much I didn't like using it. Don't get me wrong - the optics are fantastic - but it's definitely not as user-friendly as the Autocord. YMMV though.
 

Lee Birder

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2016
Messages
22
Location
Portland OR
Format
Medium Format
Rolleiflexes are extremely durable cameras-- I use them exclusively for my backpack trips. Currently I use an MX-EVS, 3.5e2 planar, MX-synch (my great-grandfather's) and a baby rollei. All are fantastic cameras, but I really have to recommend the MX-EVS - I think Rollei really hit its peak here. I prefer its focusing knob and general aesthetic to the 3.5 models, and the selenium meters on the newer cameras are mostly a waste of weight these days. Earlier Automats are of course very similar but the focusing knobs are of the smaller-diameter type. One advantage (in my opinion) of my MX-synch is that its aperture and shutter are uncoupled, making the wheels turn much smoother. That said, I like using EVS on my baby rollei and Primo JR.
I watch a lot of Rollei's on fleabay: I would recommend springing on clean looking MX-EVS that offers returns. You never know until you hold it in your hands and test all the functions, but I have seen MX-EVS' go for $180-280, which leaves plenty of room for a CLA. I paid $425 for mine at a local camera shop including case, hood, and filter set, plus a year warranty.
Good hunting!
 
OP
OP

Christophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2016
Messages
77
Location
Maple Valley, WA
Format
35mm
Thanks for the tips. From reading around, and from personal preference on cosmetics alone, I also seem to prefer the MX-EVS to most of the other Rolleis. Of course I've never even held one, but I love the look of them. A nice one is out of my range right now so I'm just going to keep it in mind for later. I'll get my budget user now and later, probably after new years, I'll look for a cherry Rollei. Or who knows, maybe I'll sell one of my other toys to finance it lol. That's a ways out, I'd rather spend a few hundred extra on film to put through my budget one.
 

piu58

Member
Joined
May 29, 2006
Messages
1,531
Location
Leipzig, Germany
Format
Medium Format
> selenium meters on the newer cameras are mostly a waste of weight these days.

I have a 3,5F an the meter still works. After more than 50 years!
 
OP
OP

Christophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2016
Messages
77
Location
Maple Valley, WA
Format
35mm
> selenium meters on the newer cameras are mostly a waste of weight these days.

I have a 3,5F an the meter still works. After more than 50 years!
Is it accurate? I've always heard they were all inaccurate, even if they did work. I'm just curious.
 

baachitraka

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
3,558
Location
Bremen, Germany.
Format
Multi Format
I may never ask about the accuracy of a light meter. This word, for me do not fit for a light meter.
 

John51

Member
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
797
Format
35mm
A vendor accepting returns is a good idea for any camera purchase but even more so if you've never used a TLR before imo.

In the 70s I went into Scrooge mode to save up for a Mamiya C330. Great camera but I just didn't take to the waist level finder. Sold it after putting less than 10 rolls through it. I was young and preferred the immediacy of SLRs. Now, I find myself thinking about giving TLRs another go as I'm not in such a hurry these days.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
... I really have to recommend the MX-EVS - I think Rollei really hit its peak here.
...

Is the MX-EVS a K4B? Rollei model numbers are so confusing. How does an MX-EVS compare to the D models (K7D)?

> selenium meters on the newer cameras are mostly a waste of weight these days.

I have a 3,5F an the meter still works. After more than 50 years!

As you can see, I've amateurishly covered the meter on my 3.5F to block light from it while it's not in use. The meter does work and is reasonably accurate. I just want to preserve it.

Also, the addition of the meter and its linkage greatly complicates any repair that's needed. I much prefer meterless Rolleis.

 

Lee Birder

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2016
Messages
22
Location
Portland OR
Format
Medium Format
I believe the MX-EVS is often referred to as the "3.5B". I have also seen it labelled as k4b, although I have also seen non-EVS MX-synchs described as k4b's. The MX-EVS is very much like a 3.5 version of the 2.8D. If you are ever looking to sell your 2.8D, I have been looking for one...
 

piu58

Member
Joined
May 29, 2006
Messages
1,531
Location
Leipzig, Germany
Format
Medium Format
> Is it accurate? I've always heard they were all inaccurate, even if they did work. I'm just curious.

When I got the camera, it was 2 stops to slow. This could be covered with adapted ISO setting. But it is easy to calibrate the meter, what I did.

> I've amateurishly covered the meter on my 3.5F to block light from it while it's not in use.

I don't think that is necessery, and I don't believe that light is the reason meters die.
The selenium sheet is covered by cellulose lacquer to protect it. The life span of such a cell depends on the quality of the lacquer.
 

Helinophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
1,088
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format
> selenium meters on the newer cameras are mostly a waste of weight these days.

I have a 3,5F an the meter still works. After more than 50 years!

Strangely, my 2.8F is pretty darn accurate as well.
I tested it against two other meters I have and with the diffuser, the incident-readings are very very close (the needle on my 2.8F goes a small hair further, indicating around 0.5 stop less exposure needed and that's it).

Shot a whole roll of Fuji 160NS and used only the built-in meter, none of the shots were underexposed (shot at EI 100 and kept the needle juuuust on the "good" side of the meter-indicator, giving the film around 0.5 stop more light than indicated).

I need to test it a bit more, but my confidence with that meter is pretty good.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2010
Messages
884
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
> selenium meters on the newer cameras are mostly a waste of weight these days.

I have a 3,5F an the meter still works. After more than 50 years!
The meter on my 3.5f is accurate enough to use with slide film. And I use a Rolleilux meter on my MX-EVS and other Automats that is similarly accurate.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format

That is good to know - thank you.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…