You mix up attachments.The Ultra Spot and Ultra Spot II are true 1° spot meter. The Luna Pro F has a 30° standard angle of view and the spot attachment is 15°/7.5°. The SBC is likely the same.
Another vote for the Pentax Digital spot meter here. But what really matters is that whatever meter you buy should offer the ability to index highlights/ shadows to the IRE (Institute of Radio Engineers) scale - it'll do everything people think zone-system stickers do, but better.
I've had a Spotmeter M for over 10 years and I've had no complaints about it. Using it mostly for LF shooting, the outer display is easy to see and it also has a readout in the finder. Built-in illumination button for the display as well.Does anyone have experience with a Minolta Spotmeter M? Would you reccommend it as a reliable meter for an amateur? Drawbacks? Thanks
You are referring to the variable angle attachment for the Luna Pro and/or Luna Pro SBC. Gossen made a true spot attachment for the SBC model. it is rare and a big bulky device.The Ultra Spot and Ultra Spot II are true 1° spot meter. The Luna Pro F has a 30° standard angle of view and the spot attachment is 15°/7.5°. The SBC is likely the same.
"Tele" attachment vs. "Profi-Spot" attachment.You are referring to the variable angle attachment for the Luna Pro and/or Luna Pro SBC. Gossen made a true spot attachment for the SBC model. it is rare and a big bulky device.
Haven't had the need to adjust it yet. I periodically check the Minolta against other hand-held and in-camera meters that I use more often and know to be accurate.Jim, I noticed the Spotmeter M has a provision to calibrate in the field+- 1EV ... have you noticed any drift that required use of that feature?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?