Shocked at how much bulk TMY-2 costs

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,244
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
So if you release the tension on the take up reel, the film comes off easily?

Depends on the camera, but generally it's easy. The tension has to be released somehow to rewind the film conventionally.

I've not had a problems loading the film, but I use Peterson tanks. You will still have the factory leader too.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,650
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
I can get 10 rolls of 36-exposure TMY-2 for $90 through Film Supply Club. Savings (for me) is $0.67/roll over individual cassettes.

I get 18 rolls of hp5plus for $90 from unique photo.
$90 for 10 is too expansive.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,650
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
If you buy 1000 feet vision it comes to $4.50 a roll.
 
Last edited:

eli griggs

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
3,825
Location
NC
Format
Multi Format

Stop loading your precious film resources as throw away tounges and back space and start making up your exposures cassettes with used films in those positions, salvaged from your previously exposed films.

Some masking tape and a little time finding out how much of each of the three pieces are needed for particular cameras will hand tailor those 12-13 frame rolls, cut the tails just long enough for the reach to the end of the tail to good frames:where your picture taking ends and likewise, figure out how many wraps onto the leader wrench you need to just reach back enough for the good frames to be taped on and picture taking begins.

Throw in two good frames to the rolls, however many frames you roll so little to no partial exposures will spoil your first and last frame, and you're golden.

Exposures, even of simple dung pills, art too expensive to be wasted starting and stopping a roll of film.

IMO.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,429
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
If you tape a tongue onto a a roll of film for loading into a Leica III, there's a chance that masking tape will peel off as it goes through the film gate and get stuck in the shutter mechanism somewhere. It's particularly bad with a bottom-loader, because you'd have to take the camera apart to get it out. But it could easily end up stuck in any camera's focal plane shutter. It's best to only feed film through a camera.
 

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,476
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
film manufacture as well as film sales are business relics.

how many buggy whips do Walmart sell?

A lot fewer than the Fuji Superia 400 they're selling. That flies off the shelves, at least according to the Wal-Mart regional manager I spoke to in NW Arkansas last year.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,799
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I have two, five-packs of 120 TMY-2 that I've been saving for a special occasion. I'm now saving up my Loonies and Toonies (can't save up pennies as we don't have them in our currency anymore...) for a 50 sheet box of 4x5 TMY-2... It's bloody expensive, but I can't live without this stuff...
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,523
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format

I've been living without it for some time now, but it ain't easy. It is still the best 400 speed B&W film made IMO. If I had a special project I would certainly break down and buy it, but for my leisure shooting I have cheaper choices that work just find in medium and large format. I think it has a clear advantage in 35mm. All that said, I find the pricing a little strange, but maybe there is a true justification.
 

BHuij

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2016
Messages
804
Location
Utah
Format
Multi Format
...I find the pricing a little strange, but maybe there is a true justification.

I'm sure someone will chime in who knows more than me about this, but my understanding is that it's an economy of scale question. Kodak production facilities for film are enormous. They have a similarly enormous overhead or up-front cost to run a batch of new film. When they were selling around 740 million rolls of film per year, this gave them a clear advantage, and their overhead cost was amortized by the huge batch sizes, allowing for a low cost-per-roll. These days, they sell an estimated 15 million rolls of film per year, or just north of 2% of their peak annual volume back in 1999 (source for these numbers). I'd be surprised to find out they make more than one batch of TMY per year. Possibly less. They have to find the right number of rolls of TMY to make so that a) they don't run out too quickly, b) they can price competitively enough that they sell all of it, and c) they still turn a profit on it. That's quite a needle to thread. And if their estimates for how much it will sell at at given price are off, then they either make way too much, and it expires in a warehouse somewhere, or they make not enough, and then it becomes a hot commodity by the people who really really want to shoot TMY (driving prices up). It makes way more sense for them to err on the side of underproducing TMY (or really any film). And if they're going to make conservative volumes of TMY on each run, the cost per roll stays higher, with the potential to inflate even more if it becomes scarce and supply lags behind demand.

Ilford by contrast has always been a much smaller operation. The number of rolls of, say, Delta 400, that they have to make to justify the expense of setting up their production facilities to crank out a batch, is a lot smaller than Kodak. Therefore they can price much lower, and make smaller, more frequent batches - which really helps mitigate problems like "oops we made too much and now it's going to expire before it sells out."

I'm just glad I generally prefer Ilford films to Kodak anyway, makes it a no brainer for me to buy the less expensive option. Delta 100, FP4+, and HP5+ take care of 95% of the B&W work I want to do, in 35mm, 120, and 4x5.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,764
Format
8x10 Format
I wonder how much bulk rolls even factor into the overall sales of this particular film, or any 35mm still film these days? TMY is a premium film, and when you need it, you need it. There isn't any real substitute for what it provides. I shoot it even in 8X10 sheets, though certainly not wastefully! Everything is getting expensive. But I am glad I put a significant stash of both speeds of TMax sheet film in my freezer before the last several rounds of price hikes. I'll have to check in there and see if I have any 35mm left. But I shoot way more 120 TMax than either 35mm or sheets these days. That's kinda the sweet spot between affordability and a decent moderate enlargement.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,799
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Andy, there has to be a rehabilitation clinic near to Coquitlam that can accept you surely?

pentaxuser

Funny you should say that... The place that I photograph a lot at in my videos just happens to be such a place
 

Helge

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Messages
3,938
Location
Denmark
Format
Medium Format
You can use dummy leader that you tape to the film end in the darkroom. With some care you should be able to get 98 percent of a bulk roll.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,650
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
The price of a product is:
what the customer is willing to pay while satisfying the greed of the producer.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,149
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The price of a product is:
what the customer is willing to pay while satisfying the greed of the producer.

I'm wondering if their is a modified version of the Dire Straits song:
"Something for nothing and get your bulk film for free"

I'm blessed/cursed with having had lots of experience in and around business people who struggle to keep prices at a level where customers buy their products and encourage others to do the same.
I've done it some myself as well.
 

BHuij

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2016
Messages
804
Location
Utah
Format
Multi Format

It's an interesting question. I keep HP5+ and Delta 100 on tap and buy them more or less exclusively in 100' rolls. I tend to only shoot FP4+ in larger formats though.

Curious what it is about TMY you like so much better than Delta 400? I don't frequently find myself wanting something that checks the "fine grain" and "fast speed" boxes at the same time, but when I do, I've been happy with the few rolls of Delta 400 I've shot.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,764
Format
8x10 Format
Delta can indeed be bullied into imitating TMX100, but only by forcing it further up past the toe onto the straight line by giving it more exposure, in effect, shooting it at 50 instead of 100, But then you're fully 3 stops slower than TMY400, and gain just a little finer grain, yet less fine than TMX100. There are also real differences in spectral response, with D100 being less sensitive to green than TMax films. And once you get into sheet film use, there are several characteristics which make TMY stand out. Of course, I've shot a lot of Ilford films too, including an 8X10 FP4 shot just yesterday, once the wind briefly settled down (at f/45, one more reason for much faster TMY).

So if you want something especially versatile, it's almost impossible to beat TMY400. I was out in the redwoods, and saw some interesting subjects which were just way too contrasty for my FP4 to handle well, deep down in the shadows. But it's what I had along, trying to use it up first, since it has been thawed out a lot longer. If a less expensive film will work, I'll use it. But in less expensive situations, like shooting 6X7 or 6X9 format, I pretty much standardize on TMX100, or perhaps TMY400 if it's too stormy for tripod work and needs to be handheld. And right now I'm experimenting with the new Acros II in roll film; but it's even more expensive than TMax! (I do have a lot of experience with the earlier version).

35mm is a whole different category for me. I don't print it big, and don't mind a conspicuously grainy look like Delta 3200, for example. It's my alter ego to my big highly-detailed large format prints. But I mainly shoot TMY400 in 35mm too, though recently I've only shot 35mm in color - nice for turning leftover scraps from my big 30 inch roll of color paper into cute little prints.
 
Last edited:

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,650
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format

I think the last 2 years proved that prices are mainly greed + customer’s willing to pay price. Literally everything the USA is overpriced based on fear that will be even more expansive.
I have no problem with Kodak still film business going under as long as they keep their cinema business.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,149
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

Not proven to me.
So many businesses are just barely hanging on, knowing that if they try to pass on all their cost increases, they will lose even more business, and probably won't survive.
And from what I understand, Eastman Kodak's film division is included in that group.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,650
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format

And they go out of business. Capitalism 101. I am talking about companies that take advantage of the situation and price gouge. And Kodak is one of those companies.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…