Koraks - both color neg film and color neg papers print optically better than ever, even if commercial workflow has gone mostly (not entirely at all) to so-called digital exposure. You can argue all you want about "digital optimized" this or that. Doesn't matter. The overall improvements in CN film itself as well as the necessary paper still puts we color darkroom printers well ahead of where we were 20 years ago. And there you go again, claiming no more paper optimized for dual usage still exists. But their very highest quality print medium still is - Fujiflex; and their most popular humble minilab product still is - Supreme.
And the fact of the matter is, most of the drum and Creo scanners themselves involved have long-term maintenance issues often relying on cannibalizing parts from other scanners of the same model, and reliant on old software. The bulk of photographers aren't shooting color film and having it scanned at all, but are now directly outputting digital shots onto inkjet, or having it done for them, if they're interested in prints at all.
Black and white film workflow, however, is much more reliant on loyal darkroom users, especially once it comes to the ongoing mfg of sheet film. Subtract these people from the equation, and Ilford would be dead in a heartbeat.
Don't say "Fujifilm" doesn't relate to camera film. It's been their official legacy corporate identity ever since their camera film lineup was in its heyday. Once a brand name and logo catches on, it's really stupid to change it, even if the product selection is a lot wider than any one specific category of the past. Nikon still uses their longstanding recognizable name and logo on all kinds of things outside the mentality of small camera photography - all sorts of medical equipment, some of it very expensive, machine vision optics, advanced microscopes, surveying instruments, etc. But it's still wisely the same corporate identity name and logo people readily identify with. Corporations work very hard and spend tons of money to establish those recognizable identities to begin with.
Kodak and Ford have been around as long as each other, yet they're still called Kodak and Ford, despite all the intervening innovations and changes in corporate hierarchy.