Shocked at how much bulk TMY-2 costs

DeletedAcct1

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2020
Messages
869
Location
World
Format
35mm

Then if the still film compartment for Eastman Kodak accounts for 10% of the total revenues, why inflating the film prices this much?
 

Anon Ymous

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
3,660
Location
Greece
Format
35mm
Then if the still film compartment for Eastman Kodak accounts for 10% of the total revenues, why inflating the film prices this much?

Because they increased the prices and (at least allegedly) film still flew off the shelf. So they increased more to get even better profit. Wether or not this strategy is viable or not is highly debatable.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,654
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
I have an idea for how they can save money: Stop making ektar…
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,473
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Hydroxychloroquine?

Kodak makes printers and supplies for the print industry.
Kodak Alaris is a "data capture" company, selling scanners and entire "data acquisition solutions" to industry.

Film is not something they really need to make or sell, anymore. It won't bankrupt them if they stop.
 

DeletedAcct1

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2020
Messages
869
Location
World
Format
35mm
Film is not something they really need to make or sell, anymore. It won't bankrupt them if they stop.
Then again why milking people with inflated prices for no reason?
 

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
872
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
Kodak prices are weird. Let’s take E100D for example. It’s the same film used in stills cameras, but it is packaged in 400 ft and 1000 ft rolls. A 400 ft roll cost me $566, and I get 80 rolls out of it by rolling it in the dark. $7/roll for a roll, compared to $27 locally, and $21 online (not including taxes/shipping). Sure, rolling it is a bit of work, but for me, it’s worth it for 1/3 the price.

And, I could definitely sell some rolls, I don’t need 80 rolls, lol. Sell it for $12, I’ll get back my initial investment after 50 rolls, and I still have 30 rolls I can use! I can get 30 rolls of slide film by getting paid $35!

And then there are short ends… color film for $1.50/roll? Yes please!

Basically, I don’t worry about the consumer film stuff, I just buy the Cine sticks.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,654
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
I think it's been explained. Part of the reason is their high overhead, cost of materials, etc. If it bothers you so much, then use films from other manufacturers.

Unfortunately this is a false statement. Kodak is a monopoly.
No other manufacturer makes color film.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,654
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format

Exactly, almost if the prices for still shooters are inflated because we are willing to pay them.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,299
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

Cine stock - packaged in a cassette of a different sort:

As best as I can roughly estimate, one 50 foot Super 8 film has about the same amount of film area as 2.25 - 2.5 rolls of 135-36 film.
The film itself is a meaningful portion of the cost. But it is a relatively small portion.

If you are going to put in the manual labour, and take the associated risks relating to all the necessary steps, you can save a bunch of cash on a lot of rolls of film.
And if you are going to sell the fruits of your labour, and your customers accept the same risks, it may very well pay you to do so.

But those two "ifs" are big ones. The vast majority of users - the ones that Eastman Kodak (for cine film) and Kodak Alaris/distributors/retailers sell almost all film to, aren't willing to accept those risks.

Comparing the cost of 1000 foot loads of cine film to factory loads of 135-36 is like comparing the cost of 100 lbs of organic flower, and a bunch of salt and yeast to the cost of a loaf of bread.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,473
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Comparing the cost of 1000 foot loads of cine film to factory loads of 135-36 is like comparing the cost of 100 lbs of organic flower, and a bunch of salt and yeast to the cost of a loaf of bread.

Good for the goose (Ektachrome) but not the ol' b&w ganders (Tmax, Tri-x)?
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,713
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
We once had an ex Kodak engineer with a lot of knowledge of matters Kodak in the technical sense. Now if we could only get a recently retired senior accountant and process engineer on Photrio and on whom we could rely for absolute impartiality having retired, then we can maybe start to get answers that may just may help resolve some of the questions for those of us who harbour any doubts about where the truth lies

Until then ....

pentaxuser
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,299
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Good for the goose (Ektachrome) but not the ol' b&w ganders (Tmax, Tri-x)?

If there was a market with decent volumes and associated cameras that used 1000 foot loads of T-Max and Tri-X still film, you would see it marketed that way.
It would be through the Kodak Alaris distribution network though - not directly from Eastman Kodak.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,248
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Bulk loading for 35mm film makes sense if one shoots enough film and processes it themself. Otherwise the cost of the cassettes must be added to every roll.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,654
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
Bulk loading for 35mm film makes sense if one shoots enough film and processes it themself. Otherwise the cost of the cassettes must be added to every roll.

Тhe cost is not double
 
Last edited:

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
872
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format

Certainly has for me, I am making enough to hopefully get my rolliflex fixed this summer by selling 220 and cutting 4x5 film! Very happy with that.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,299
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Certainly has for me, I am making enough to hopefully get my rolliflex fixed this summer by selling 220 and cutting 4x5 film! Very happy with that.

I applaud your efforts.
I'm assuming though that you can appreciate that you and your customers are unusual, and sufficiently "rare" that neither Eastman Kodak nor Kodak Alaris would be likely to be able to base their business plans on your examples.
 

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
872
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
I applaud your efforts.
I'm assuming though that you can appreciate that you and your customers are unusual, and sufficiently "rare" that neither Eastman Kodak nor Kodak Alaris would be likely to be able to base their business plans on your examples.

Yeah, I realize that. But dispite what folks told me, it has been working out. Even if it’s only viable on a small scale.

Bulk loading for 35mm film makes sense if one shoots enough film and processes it themself. Otherwise the cost of the cassettes must be added to every roll.

I get them by the handful from my lab for free, and I think most labs are happy to give them to you if you ask.

I have 10 old Ilford cassettes that I use for personal rolls, and I love them. Well worth the $30, which I think is a steal from what I’ve seen on The Big Auction site, and certainly better than the new plastic ones.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,654
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
I have 10 old Ilford cassettes that I use for personal rolls, and I love them. Well worth the $30, which I think is a steal from what I’ve seen on The Big Auction site, and certainly better than the new plastic ones.

I buy AP cassettes. I think around $1. Reusable so one time cost.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,248
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Back when I shot slides in the '70's I would buy a 100' roll of Ektachrome and for a long time the labs would return the cartridges and then suddenly they refused because it was too much work. At that point, paying for a new cartridge for each roll made bulk loading unattractive to me.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,713
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm

If you process your own cassettes then after a few months you build up a stock of used-once factory cassettes which can then be used for several times each as reusable cassettes for bulk film, can't they?

pentaxuser
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,473
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
used-once factory cassettes

The reason people tape film to some bit that's sticking out those factory cassettes is that the cassettes are not meant to survive dismantling (the cap gets bent) and the cassette itself is weird - the factory cap doesn't easily fit back on it, even if it's not bent out of shape.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…