Sharpness is a bourgeois concept?

Zakynthos Town

H
Zakynthos Town

  • 0
  • 0
  • 147
Driftwood

A
Driftwood

  • 5
  • 1
  • 208
Trees

D
Trees

  • 2
  • 3
  • 483
Waiting For The Rain

A
Waiting For The Rain

  • 3
  • 0
  • 802
Sonatas XII-53 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-53 (Life)

  • 4
  • 3
  • 1K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,779
Messages
2,796,579
Members
100,033
Latest member
apoman
Recent bookmarks
0

Dali

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
1,865
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
I would not say that sharpness is a bourgeois concept. Looking at this video (I did not watch it entirely though) I would say that sharpness is less part if the photographic experience. After all, why not as long as taking "sharp" pictures is not against the law...
 

Dali

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
1,865
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
HCB was bourgeois himself. Like many with left, socialist declarations without living to it by themselves. We did our part in USSR, while bourgeois like HCB where wealthy from childhood.

Sorry but I don't see the contradiction. :blink:
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,490
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
HCB was bourgeois himself. Like many with left, socialist declarations without living to it by themselves. We did our part in USSR, while bourgeois like HCB where wealthy from childhood.

Sorry but I don't see the contradiction. :blink:

Logic is not a requirement on the internet. :smile:
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,231
Format
8x10 Format
It always amazes me that when most people try to revive some antique look or methodology in order to be new and creative, it just comes out looking like an antique wannabee instead of anything fresh and exciting. A bourgeois mentality is assuming that any of this has to do
with alternative equipment choices to begin with. Just get a Smartphone with a "Pretentious" app built into it, and be done with it.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,638
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

dplaton

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2018
Messages
1
Location
Romania
Format
35mm
nothing wrong with the bourgeois.
I think there is an opposition between artist aesthetic and the common one.
As a pro you must deliver sharp postcard images, in the real world there is not such an artificial sharpness.
I only know the HCB photos that are made with no commercial intention.
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
Firstly, the HCB comment is nonsensical, as it was probably intended.
If you enjoy photography more than digital capture who cares what pictures cell phones can produce. As amateurs were have the freedom to pursue what we like to do, which includes the whole process from loading film to printing and mounting. It’s the whole process that’s enjoyable.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourgeoisie

i think more people than city dwellers like sharp photographs.
i live in a place where you can travel 3 minutes outside of any of the big cities
and you are in the countryside and most people i run into while i wander the back roads
well, they like sharp photographs and they like to know what they are looking at.
and even though we have one of the best art schools in the country in our backyard .
most people don't "get art" whether it is a soft photograph or some sort of conceptual piece
like a clothesline with fresh clothes strung across a polluted river entitled "clean clothes dirty river"
what i think is funny, is that HCB decided for everyone else what was and was not "good"
just like ansel adams ( nothing worse than a fuzzy photograph of a sharp subject or whatever it was )
and people love to do what famous+successful people say, whether they are city dwellers or country folk.
the whole idea that x photography is terrible or lame because of how its made or there has to be
some sort of over arching group to determine what is good and what is not i find to be kind of wacky at best
personally speaking/regarding "photographic art" (whatever that is), i couldn't care less what HCB or ansel adams said, and it is too bad people
are so rigid that they don't allow themselves to wander off the trail a little bit. they might learn about photography and themselves.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
If Lomography pleases the Lomographer, good for him. If the photographer respects the subject, and does not inflict artistic pretensions upon the viewer, good for us.
 

faberryman

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
For most post war lenses, sharpness, in the true sense of the word, is not a bourgeois concept, it is a given, and the maxim is an anachronism. Invoking "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept" is usually just an excuse for posting missed focus images on forums. The is a long one over at RFF where there are all sorts of mediocre images. Looking at those images, the thread title should be "Out of focus is a bourgeois concept" or "Camera shake is a bourgeois concept". HCB would hardly praise most of the examples.
 
Last edited:

Lee Rust

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
513
Location
Rochester NY
Format
Multi Format
Aesthetics aside, we live in a scorekeeping culture where line pairs per millimeter or MTF curves are easily tallied and compared. High numbers are winners, low numbers are losers. For many people, that's all they need to know.
 
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
2,905
Location
Flintstone MD
Format
35mm
I wouldn't say bourgeois. Currently over emphasized is more accurate. Would you use a soft focus lens for macro work? perhaps a long macro for portrait? Horses for courses.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,490
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Karl Marx gave bourgeois a bad name.
 

Kodachromeguy

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2016
Messages
2,073
Location
Olympia, Washington
Format
Multi Format
Aesthetics aside, we live in a scorekeeping culture where line pairs per millimeter or MTF curves are easily tallied and compared. High numbers are winners, low numbers are losers. For many people, that's all they need to know.
Certainly for the "photographers" (I should have used a more rude term) who fester on forums like Dpreview, scorekeeping results are all-important. That is why there is such immediate hatred of any mention of film photography, although I am always baffled why they are the least bit intimidated by inferior, low-dynamic-range, grainy, expensive, clumsy, outdated chemical-imaging film.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,588
Format
35mm RF

Arklatexian

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,777
Location
Shreveport,
Format
Multi Format
Karl Marx gave bourgeois a bad name.
Me bourgeois? Why hell yes I am. For that matter many people, at the time, might have considered old Karl, himself, as bourgeois. By the way, what took the place of religion as the "opiate of the masses"? Sports maybe? Certainly not film based photography. Didn't HCB quit photography and take up painting which is not as "bourgeois" in many people's opinion?......Regards!
 

chip j

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
2,193
Location
NE Ohio
Format
35mm
On what evidence do you base your knowledge of HCB's sexual habits?
It's there in plain view if you read enough about him. Read his bio or pick up a copy his "Early Work" (I don't know if the reference is in there or not, but it's a Great book).
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom