• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

SFX 200 Serious Issue

Brian McNamee

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
5
Location
Ireland
Format
Medium Format
Hi Guys,

Ilford SFX 200.

Fist post for me, thanks for accepting me.
The attached image was shot on a hasselblad H1 and developed in 1D-11 for 10mins as suggested. Rinsed as per normal in tap water..fixed in ilford Fix and washed in photoflo using distilled water.


Any advice on what happened?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20190228_0008.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 579
Issue with backing paper. Film was either expired or poorly stored.
 
There was a very similar post and picture of negs like this very recently. I'll go through my history to try and find it.

In the mean time, hopefully others will chip in with comments...

Terry S
 
Poor storage - likely from refrigeration or freezing & defrosting improperly. Has caused backing paper to stick to the film. Operator error in other words.
 
Lachlan Young said:
Poor storage - likely from refrigeration or freezing & defrosting improperly. Has caused backing paper to stick to the film. Operator error in other words.
Click to expand...

On an Ilford factory visit a few years ago they told us that one of the major issues people had with films was from refrigeration and freezing their films which were then not allowed to warm up slowly. In fact they said if frozen then first put in a refrigerator then later a cool place. So I agree with you.

Ian
 
halfaman said:
A friend of myne and myself had the same issue with some 120 rolls of Ilford FP4+ last year. It is not an isolated issue.
Click to expand...
Just so we can be sure of what you mean when you say you had similar problems, I think it will help if you were to confirm or deny that your friend and you had both frozen the films and then used them without warming them up slowly. If your problem was with fresh film properly stored at room temperature or just in a cool room then that may suggest other causes.

pentaxuser
 
We are seeing more and more of this.. I think the fact that a lot of old film is being purchased from people not storing the film correctlly may be the cause... Maybe not the case with the OP but I see
these types of failures on all the sites or groups I am on.
When film was king and digital was only a gleam in Canons eye this type of failure was not prevalent as film was fresh and abundent.

Just my 2cents - I would be wary of purchasing old film, but if you want to send it to me I will try it out on my own work.
 

What I mean is that I am seeing too many similar cases with Ilford film in recent times, this is the fourth case I am aware of including myne. Films affected are FP4+, HP5+ and now SFX 200.

There are two possibilties:
1.- Four unrelated and experienced persons have suddenly forgotten how to store film
2.- There is something wrong with Ilford or their distribution channel.
 
OK, let the HARMAN haters gave a go at Ilford 120 film now. Kodak can use some companionship. When all film suppliers are put out of business, there's always digital. Sad.
 
As long as the film remains in its original sealed package there is no need for a slow warming up. In other cases there should not be an issue either.
 
AgX said:
As long as the film remains in its original sealed package there is no need for a slow warming up. In other cases there should not be an issue either.
Click to expand...
So taking a film out of a freezer or fridge, then out of its sealed packaging and loading it straight into a camera on, say, a hot July afternoon without letting it acclimatise first is ok in your view, is it? The condensation that would quickly form on the film and inside the film holder when attached to/inserted into the camera wouldn't be an issue then?
 
I bought this stock (10 rolls) off a supplier i have been using for a while. He stores his stock correctly and up to now iv had zero problems, This was never frozen or in fridge.All wrapping was intact and as it should be. Iv shot another roll from same batch with no issues, although i DID use Xtol for it. Both of these shots were 30mins apart one on the left looks considerably less noisy...
 

Attachments

  • test.jpg
    172.5 KB · Views: 281
I had the exact same experience with a roll of Rerapan 400 ASA 127 roll film and went back to Freestyle with the issue. They checked some existing stock they had from the same production run and discovered that it was a problem with the emulsion. they replaced the (3) rolls I purchased from them with fresh from another batch
 
Unfortunately, your supplier is also vulnerable to the same problems, if damage of this sort occurred before the film got to them.
The supply chain isn't nearly as reliable as it once was.
 
AgX said:
As long as the film remains in its original sealed package there is no need for a slow warming up. In other cases there should not be an issue either.
Click to expand...

No that's incorrect, Ilford made that point quite clear. All emulsions contain some residual moisture but backing papers contain more even inside the sealed foil packaging. So if you've frozen that moisture it needs to unfreeze and diffuse slowly, too fast and you get these issues.

Ian
 
My frozen roll film (and sheet film) always goes into the fridge for a few hours, then into my darkroom for a few hours more, before use. Never had an issue with Ilford film, including SFX 200.
 
 
What makes me wonder is that lately we got several cases of mottling.
 
Brian McNamee said:
Both of these shots were 30mins apart one on the left looks considerably less noisy...
Click to expand...
The mottling is present in both shots. It's visible in the sky in the left one, just not as obvious.

And, yes, it needs to warm up slowly, whether it's in the foil or not. And the foil shouldn't be opened until it is warmed up.
 
winger said:
And, yes, it needs to warm up slowly, whether it's in the foil or not. And the foil shouldn't be opened until it is warmed up.
Click to expand...

Condensation takes place by vapour in the warm air condensing on the cold surface of what subject is taken out of the cold/fridge. Thus on the outside of the packaging foil or on the outside of the cassette. Otherwise that warm air would have to get somehow onto the film.

There is no need for warming up slowly as long the critical surfaces are warm when in contact with warm air. If they come in contact all.
 
So just to be clear, how did you and your friend store the film? I am simply trying to help the OP. We have seen explanations from other experienced users that cold storage and lack of time taken to bring the film up to ambient temperature can produce the effect seen by the OP.
I thought I had asked a simple question of you to which an answer on how you stored the film prior to use was going to be equally simple

pentaxuser
 
I have to ask. Can you see this on the film directly with a glass? Any chance this is from scanning?
 
The issue seems to be good results with xtol, bad results with ID11, for rolls from the same batch which Brian did not refrigerate.
 
mshchem said:
I have to ask. Can you see this on the film directly with a glass? Any chance this is from scanning?
Click to expand...
Hi, no iv scanned loads since and before on this machine and no issues. Im scanning a few 35mm frames now that has been developed in the same ID-11 as the problem roll...will post results soon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register