Setting up analyser

Junkyard

D
Junkyard

  • 1
  • 2
  • 34
Double exposure.jpg

H
Double exposure.jpg

  • 3
  • 1
  • 171
RIP

D
RIP

  • 0
  • 2
  • 207
Sonatas XII-28 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-28 (Homes)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 184
Street with Construction

H
Street with Construction

  • 1
  • 0
  • 178

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,332
Messages
2,789,837
Members
99,876
Latest member
WillemdeLange
Recent bookmarks
0

digiconvert

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
817
Location
Cannock UK
Format
Multi Format
I have recently aquired a Durst Labometer and an calibrating it for portra 160VC with Kodak Endura as my standard paper. I have posted 3 images below, from left to right ;
- Scan of grey card and colour swatch un daylight used as the calibration shot-seems OK, a little dull but OK.

- A scan of a negative I chose at random to check the calibration. It is light and insipid but without colour casts in the sky.

- A print of the same neg done on the Labometer. It seems a little dark.

My questions are as follows;
Do you think the print of the scanned neg is overly dark or is it just an exposure problem with the metering on the sky ?
Does anyone have any suggestions as to adjustments I should make in my 'standard' ?

Thanks - Colour is fun but I need to learn a lot !


CJB
 

Attachments

  • greycard.jpg
    greycard.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 143
  • scanfish.jpg
    scanfish.jpg
    23 KB · Views: 166
  • printfish.jpg
    printfish.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 144

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
Look at the door. In the last pic it's way too dark. Also looks like a colour cast on that door. You cropped the two prints differently. :confused: Makes it a little tougher to compare.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Messages
10
Location
Czech Republic
Format
4x5 Format
I have recently aquired a Durst Labometer and an calibrating it for portra 160VC with Kodak Endura as my standard paper. I have posted 3 images below, from left to right ;
- Scan of grey card and colour swatch un daylight used as the calibration shot-seems OK, a little dull but OK.

- A scan of a negative I chose at random to check the calibration. It is light and insipid but without colour casts in the sky.

- A print of the same neg done on the Labometer. It seems a little dark.

My questions are as follows;
Do you think the print of the scanned neg is overly dark or is it just an exposure problem with the metering on the sky ?
Does anyone have any suggestions as to adjustments I should make in my 'standard' ?

Thanks - Colour is fun but I need to learn a lot !


CJB
Hallo, do you have reference negative and difusor for your Labometer?
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,039
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
digiconvert was last seen: Dec 1, 2013

Seems a bit late...
:D Isn't this the classic case of needing someone who has successfully calibrated this particular analyser to write a short article on it that can be referred to by any members who obtain such an analyser?

This may not solve everything but at least it forms a platform to which the person can refer should he be unable to do the calibration.

This type of thread falls into the Flying Dutchman category i.e. a thread that is condemned to sail the seven seas for all eternity :D

pentaxuser
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom